Received: from mail-bk0-f62.google.com ([209.85.214.62]:43481) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Ui2Hw-0007B6-Ue for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 05:49:25 -0700 Received: by mail-bk0-f62.google.com with SMTP id jg1sf42750bkc.27 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 05:48:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=7+sFKSMcJgwvL1TxTmtCxzOCCJS3c9202EncSdOYDlg=; b=CGY9Uc7ImLDGeFr7tolJnAvRWDlFUE7GGEzGFzh39CB3W9nMJ/17lf6aEvyMW4ahlA v0tkskE4z6qaRHpDPtNWypYsMpL6Y+NZ6cWI3Mx417VxAU1aeOD7qBXMbswqNaNgZNee NVNTH1xZKhLSOVSL65uMbxSsgBK6J4h6oS3Lc06HQ5XxbtgeZCTLeVjzoZD9wOlAyJjc 9Ud29LK6Kl0vgu1LvsWkPoC/3DPV75MIGq8fBSzgEBywzkKxHnrVBla4YEdWU0sheA4v wBkTixisSkR87oCsyB5UE0Qi6EkSYQ4a6PtvcEleuRogP3TWt0V4SnngFhHkX9wnlOIn k9yg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=7+sFKSMcJgwvL1TxTmtCxzOCCJS3c9202EncSdOYDlg=; b=OlluPVO9aNWFIkorpI/s5+0M0sVVHJwLYyIhdoYiFhkdI+1np4LGk0vZ/ZlvLfDjJx z6mNb3BpmVNeLai/QxBFvJqd64/KBMWN3deBJ3V1PvHFed4YEbKFVrTk0gArlVRksR++ l7zSSg8FX5f5EEZ59X+wD5JBqBuI3NLUQkunOZWw99pDJlPd9o2+W42U6fs8KOGvjHv5 eo/h84C7mTL45YiAkjCIbTnYXPwgQz44cKYkozW+5jegK7bu7hqtrZXtOzCNfwWtv/oN zr8fBM9YvT/ZPn5BrJQu+jKLlZ1s/ia3SLjhR5hON1ArOaMuvCFlKhMnKYe9a11mpPyz i/cw== X-Received: by 10.180.189.135 with SMTP id gi7mr755619wic.3.1369918137804; Thu, 30 May 2013 05:48:57 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.87.36 with SMTP id u4ls236874wiz.19.gmail; Thu, 30 May 2013 05:48:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.204.241.8 with SMTP id lc8mr778041bkb.1.1369918137257; Thu, 30 May 2013 05:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com (mail-lb0-f175.google.com [209.85.217.175]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i9si3420836bki.2.2013.05.30.05.48.57 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 30 May 2013 05:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.175; Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id v10so488153lbd.6 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 05:48:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.19.39 with SMTP id b7mr3517379lae.38.1369918137063; Thu, 30 May 2013 05:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.1.166 with HTTP; Thu, 30 May 2013 05:48:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51A747F3.7060000@gmx.de> References: <51A379EF.3020803@gmx.de> <51A6685C.3010505@lojban.org> <51A747F3.7060000@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 06:48:56 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01493df4ee5e6104ddeeeb79 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --089e01493df4ee5e6104ddeeeb79 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:37 AM, selpa'i wrote: > la .betsemes. cu cusku di'e > >> Under the merge; >> >> {lo tatoebas jufra} may be written as {lo jufra pe la tatoebas}. >> {lo karce pe la betsemes} could be written {lo betsemes karce} >> >> But what about {lo karce pe la selpa'i}? >> {lo selpa'i karce}? This would mean something totally different, >> "beloved car", not Selpa'i's car. >> >> Of course, all of them may be rewritten as >> lo la tatoebas ku jufra >> lo la betsemes ku karce >> lo la selpa'i ku karce >> > > I think it's less strange if you consider the conversion formula to be: > > lo broda brode ~= lo brode pe lo broda > > Now you can plug in any broda you want, one possible candidate being > {.tato'ebas.}, so that {lo jufra pe *lo* .tato'ebas.}. That way there is no > difference between a cmevla- and a brivla-seltau. There only seems to be > one because cmevla are always names, so you don't need the extra step of > adding {me la} (because this is already part of the cmevla's definition). That breaks too many things, i.e., all tanru, because it would force {lo crino mlatu} to be {lo mlatu pe lo crino}, and any current usage would have to changed to {lo ke crino mlatu} or {lo crino bo mlatu} to override it. -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --089e01493df4ee5e6104ddeeeb79 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:37 AM, selpa'i <sela= dwa@gmx.de> wrote:
la .betsemes. cu cusku di'e
Under the merge;

{lo tatoebas jufra} may be written as {lo jufra pe la tatoebas}.
{lo karce pe la betsemes} could be written {lo betsemes karce}

But what about {lo karce pe la selpa'i}?
{lo selpa'i karce}? This would mean something totally different,
"beloved car", not Selpa'i's car.

Of course, all of them may be rewritten as
lo la tatoebas ku jufra
lo la betsemes ku karce
lo la selpa'i ku karce

I think it's less strange if you consider the conversion formula to be:=

lo broda brode ~=3D lo brode pe lo broda

Now you can plug in any broda you want, one possible candidate being {.tato= 'ebas.}, so that {lo jufra pe *lo* .tato'ebas.}. That way there is = no difference between a cmevla- and a brivla-seltau. There only seems to be= one because cmevla are always names, so you don't need the extra step = of adding {me la} (because this is already part of the cmevla's definit= ion).
=A0
That breaks too many things, i.e., all tanru, because i= t would force {lo crino mlatu} to be {lo mlatu pe lo crino}, and any curren= t usage would have to changed to {lo ke crino mlatu} or {lo crino bo mlatu}= to override it.


--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'uca= i ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come t= o the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--089e01493df4ee5e6104ddeeeb79--