Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.17.22 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.17.22;
Message-ID: <51A74B32.3010705@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 14:50:58 +0200
From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla
References: <CAHxnAmJvBZ1_4S1OF45n3dd5g2iQmFEGiQbsyBTN6PwybsNkrA@mail.gmail.com> <51A379EF.3020803@gmx.de> <CAHxnAm+HZGvy=Ck9nvogsR_uHL=+BYPho6vDKe8WGp-H4xKmEA@mail.gmail.com> <51A6685C.3010505@lojban.org> <CAMKwHj3gpou-t-6wPOLP7TCXdGhVGU2z+H-z4g=yGJK8Yg2gEg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHxnAmJELwg6ke9jDbOqyoR-f=dy4nK+rENyH609tdOdM1D4jQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHxnAmLDc51aG9_aW49KUaVYZgyY4FeDtKUx=9usU8T9BW7jJA@mail.gmail.com> <51A747F3.7060000@gmx.de> <CAMKwHj1WE4VRXtAWEWugEcwL-Mq+RT7poCT_jV9Wng=Yk4UYrA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMKwHj1WE4VRXtAWEWugEcwL-Mq+RT7poCT_jV9Wng=Yk4UYrA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

la .aionys. cu cusku di'e
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:37 AM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de
>     I think it's less strange if you consider the conversion formula to be:
>
>     lo broda brode ~= lo brode pe lo broda
>
>     Now you can plug in any broda you want, one possible candidate being
>     {.tato'ebas.}, so that {lo jufra pe *lo* .tato'ebas.}. That way
>     there is no difference between a cmevla- and a brivla-seltau. There
>     only seems to be one because cmevla are always names, so you don't
>     need the extra step of adding {me la} (because this is already part
>     of the cmevla's definition).
>
> That breaks too many things, i.e., all tanru, because it would force {lo
> crino mlatu} to be {lo mlatu pe lo crino}, and any current usage would
> have to changed to {lo ke crino mlatu} or {lo crino bo mlatu} to
> override it.

I didn't say it would be the only way to interpret tanru, just the one 
relevant to Betseme's point, so it breaks absolutely nothing.

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.