Received: from mail-ee0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]:38007) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Ui2U8-0007LX-Cs for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 06:01:48 -0700 Received: by mail-ee0-f61.google.com with SMTP id t10sf2095eei.26 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 06:01:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=1G0QKnUZ+jzc/dKeuTkITyG7NVP9uJRRRvgHSVpybSk=; b=ev6nIkh3fV3tZFi9bpEzNPyD/7egs++Y2a4UpjuM4yikmIevJm/J3MmtddJW5HW231 SQ9KQSkdGLZg4jI2hgt+QXoLULz3jxZXlpga8OJfp2oRp0nZ2WekMC4iVvFkNGZbE7WJ bR9QBLUE1eT6I7h19wpy0G3peIoEJcWvS1RZBCQRULxDOm8FPaFuOdpp0RDgvCmdJCbU 14Cr/UtoBBYr+zpJ34q+NWT5A9MNQNKS/NrJgEzbEkHcWL2Ckh97Rd4vYDVxebvrbZGB CrgYxnUPqkCWJ632zS64N+nbDXQ0OargNMjdJXFjabV4ArZofS94YzhE9RQO+D7brZSy oLhg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=1G0QKnUZ+jzc/dKeuTkITyG7NVP9uJRRRvgHSVpybSk=; b=IZmqENQGjPyGMgvgYXIpGXACOGWi5VzF7d1Fr6UhaKSbb+lRqve4LK17LWRWNOneY5 xqxnpOMVrgED+Yji1CSayEDPSf4FXgLiWo543wJ5PpUGcthsV22I/q9pfbpVq1Vg2mQ3 c2W3D+tZWlPay54GNFMlqhPHjpX4gT5bcSCri3RmPWLPT8rsugUuyvcJ+P4s/sZX1EZF cml2LA057hXOG0Eou625Uo/jN1xMVehSrG5VFDBk0CzgWBWALr9yG4WCHR8/BZchthZU h2+YACmJknf0XcxayPSmxMtT5TlHtsBts5YjdQmxwyImhXGI7Y7jM4mv3yyfnAugJl+w OjQA== X-Received: by 10.180.10.103 with SMTP id h7mr759820wib.16.1369918893279; Thu, 30 May 2013 06:01:33 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.75.165 with SMTP id d5ls229640wiw.27.gmail; Thu, 30 May 2013 06:01:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.204.183.197 with SMTP id ch5mr787136bkb.3.1369918892193; Thu, 30 May 2013 06:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com (mail-lb0-f173.google.com [209.85.217.173]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i9si3423947bki.2.2013.05.30.06.01.32 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 30 May 2013 06:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.173 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.173; Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id t10so506766lbi.4 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 06:01:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.26.166 with SMTP id m6mr3523548lag.50.1369918891856; Thu, 30 May 2013 06:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.1.166 with HTTP; Thu, 30 May 2013 06:01:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51A74B32.3010705@gmx.de> References: <51A379EF.3020803@gmx.de> <51A6685C.3010505@lojban.org> <51A747F3.7060000@gmx.de> <51A74B32.3010705@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 07:01:31 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.173 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160a6f4eb9a2f04ddef1821 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --089e0160a6f4eb9a2f04ddef1821 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:50 AM, selpa'i wrote: > la .aionys. cu cusku di'e > >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:37 AM, selpa'i > I think it's less strange if you consider the conversion formula to >> be: >> >> lo broda brode ~= lo brode pe lo broda >> >> Now you can plug in any broda you want, one possible candidate being >> {.tato'ebas.}, so that {lo jufra pe *lo* .tato'ebas.}. That way >> there is no difference between a cmevla- and a brivla-seltau. There >> only seems to be one because cmevla are always names, so you don't >> need the extra step of adding {me la} (because this is already part >> of the cmevla's definition). >> >> That breaks too many things, i.e., all tanru, because it would force {lo >> crino mlatu} to be {lo mlatu pe lo crino}, and any current usage would >> have to changed to {lo ke crino mlatu} or {lo crino bo mlatu} to >> override it. >> > > I didn't say it would be the only way to interpret tanru, just the one > relevant to Betseme's point, so it breaks absolutely nothing. And how would you determine when to use that interpretation and when to use the current one? -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --089e0160a6f4eb9a2f04ddef1821 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:50 AM, selpa'i <sela= dwa@gmx.de> wrote:
la .aionys. cu cusku di'e
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:37 AM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de
=A0 =A0 I think it's less strange if you consider the conversion formul= a to be:

=A0 =A0 lo broda brode ~=3D lo brode pe lo broda

=A0 =A0 Now you can plug in any broda you want, one possible candidate bein= g
=A0 =A0 {.tato'ebas.}, so that {lo jufra pe *lo* .tato'ebas.}. That= way
=A0 =A0 there is no difference between a cmevla- and a brivla-seltau. There=
=A0 =A0 only seems to be one because cmevla are always names, so you don= 9;t
=A0 =A0 need the extra step of adding {me la} (because this is already part=
=A0 =A0 of the cmevla's definition).

That breaks too many things, i.e., all tanru, because it would force {lo crino mlatu} to be {lo mlatu pe lo crino}, and any current usage would
have to changed to {lo ke crino mlatu} or {lo crino bo mlatu} to
override it.

I didn't say it would be the only way to interpret tanru, just the one = relevant to Betseme's point, so it breaks absolutely nothing.

And how would you determine when to use that interpretation an= d when to use the current one?

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Lu= ke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--089e0160a6f4eb9a2f04ddef1821--