Received: from mail-pd0-f188.google.com ([209.85.192.188]:38796) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UiIQA-0006bz-MP for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 23:02:40 -0700 Received: by mail-pd0-f188.google.com with SMTP id y11sf312786pdj.25 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 23:02:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=zBS7t2afMiTFUeHvw6ChUHPIhOW+cmHpzkgyJNSR0a4=; b=gKTo9ug5gTKtQvFThMVpKdb1YGOpfWTlFzIv/mZn5UQ9VyramoHUuNef/w4Indjqup l6jrU2F+gyZjF5qEU2oocs/ieEIEuAcOTyFi7aW8dKHvyCOJ99HK+3iiwHnsTlNUizyM /wv8acVnxu2bKpTcK3/wRThDaSXELmNwDTgdmAzKQtlN9QZpVfL6kZKEkV6LL0XBC2Em xERr9b+GeSIpTTvIthet6ZksX28ZcRT33DN6Wps7p/rMdheK05dmZ6jsnerM9U6a/Zil D4mN182ffA2SH8rKQjGK69i5Wl7UE2u0e98SekEJtIJtskTjlqXGTZkZ9ptwwi922Pjj rb4g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=zBS7t2afMiTFUeHvw6ChUHPIhOW+cmHpzkgyJNSR0a4=; b=nOjGuLYqr/eR2sZfPV4wXmjgMON61tA1RMFZoxaSVfswrrkgLPzA54Oipvqm+PqguA sXkbUbBabcauvvWwpsfZwJ3VHd7Pw44Pso7FLjk4C/zje5nKIsAckK46LXdcrKhV/Bwe WxpKc6mfZ8cnumG0eNVsNtpsghzisPA3GGHb69siLDdhS9KQn72AgbNgKNRxInsUkuKw 8rNHQkAT8bxQf9IF4KH53G96sU6IrwOd1DTCy104b9BwS7/psE4y8KXaZjzkvs9BdmEM gGYQMp+RjYH9GNwffAd+ec7KFgSSPVJisqHG0+jgAcJFp1dD6Wdman8t74b9bC+fHvvB MEag== X-Received: by 10.49.40.168 with SMTP id y8mr904839qek.9.1369980152282; Thu, 30 May 2013 23:02:32 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.12.7 with SMTP id u7ls776964qeb.54.gmail; Thu, 30 May 2013 23:02:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.104.8 with SMTP id ga8mr367855qeb.18.1369980151737; Thu, 30 May 2013 23:02:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 23:02:31 -0700 (PDT) From: la arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <7384e755-7269-4109-9992-006eaad68497@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <20130530215438.GU3114@samsa.fritz.box> References: <51A379EF.3020803@gmx.de> <51A6685C.3010505@lojban.org> <20130530211535.GT3114@samsa.fritz.box> <51A7C4B8.7010900@gmx.de> <20130530215438.GU3114@samsa.fritz.box> Subject: Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_478_19782396.1369980151351" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_478_19782396.1369980151351 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday, May 31, 2013 1:54:38 AM UTC+4, v4hn wrote: > > This pretty much sounds like you don't want=20 > > {lo selpa'i karce} to possibly mean {lo karce pe la selpa'i}.=20 > I don't want that to be expandable that way either. Otherwise I like the=20 merge. =20 > > > v4hn=20 > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:29:28PM +0200, selpa'i wrote:=20 > > la .van. cu cusku di'e=20 > > >Actually since someone first told me that brivla are allowed=20 > > >cmene I always disliked even that quite a lot. It's too easy to confus= e=20 > > >these "names" with the bridi meaning.=20 > >=20 > > Then how do people not get confused about someone being called Amado=20 > > or Aim=E9? And even if they do, I'm confident that you can tell apart= =20 > > {la} from {lo}, which are even clearer.=20 > >=20 > > >Nothing against you selpa'i,=20 > > >but you're definitely not my beloved and if e.g. {coi selpa'i} leaves= =20 > > >this open, I'm pretty pissed.=20 > >=20 > > On IRC at least, {coi broda} is considered the same as {coi le=20 > > broda}, not {coi la broda}.=20 > >=20 > > To me, {coi selpa'i} greets someone beloved, not someone named=20 > > "selpa'i". If you want to greet me, say {coi la selpa'i} or I won't=20 > > assume you mean me.=20 > >=20 > > >Also in NatLangs not having this distinction=20 > > >can introduce formal ambiguities for colloquial speech (german: "Der= =20 > Mueller=20 > > >ist zuverlaessig" - {la OR lo mlopre cu se lacri}).=20 > >=20 > > But not in Lojban. We have la and lo to disambiguate.=20 > >=20 > > >I strongly agree with la lojbab on that one:=20 > > >brivla are nicknames, NOT proper names.=20 > >=20 > > I don't see why that should be so. Seems quite arbitrary.=20 > >=20 > > >If you wish to make them names, use cmene that look similar=20 > > >or end in non-final rafsi.=20 > >=20 > > My name is "selpa'i" and nothing else. I do not identify with any=20 > > other string of letters. My name is not {.selpa'is.} and also not=20 > > {.selpam.}, those are entirely different names.=20 > >=20 > > mu'o mi'e la selpa'i=20 > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_478_19782396.1369980151351 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Friday, May 31, 2013 1:54:38 AM UTC+4, v4hn wrote:
This pretty much sounds like you don't want

{lo selpa'i karce} to possibly mean {lo karce pe la selpa'i}.

I don't want that to be expandable tha= t way either. Otherwise I like the merge.
 


v4hn

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:29:28PM +0200, selpa'i wrote:
> la .van. cu cusku di'e
> >Actually since someone first told me that brivla are allowed
> >cmene I always disliked even that quite a lot. It's too easy t= o confuse
> >these "names" with the bridi meaning.
>=20
> Then how do people not get confused about someone being called Ama= do
> or Aim=E9? And even if they do, I'm confident that you can tell ap= art
> {la} from {lo}, which are even clearer.
>=20
> >Nothing against you selpa'i,
> >but you're definitely not my beloved and if e.g. {coi selpa'i}= leaves
> >this open, I'm pretty pissed.
>=20
> On IRC at least, {coi broda} is considered the same as {coi le
> broda}, not {coi la broda}.
>=20
> To me, {coi selpa'i} greets someone beloved, not someone named
> "selpa'i". If you want to greet me, say {coi la selpa'i} or I won'= t
> assume you mean me.
>=20
> >Also in NatLangs not having this distinction
> >can introduce formal ambiguities for colloquial speech (german= : "Der Mueller
> >ist zuverlaessig" - {la OR lo mlopre cu se lacri}).
>=20
> But not in Lojban. We have la and lo to disambiguate.
>=20
> >I strongly agree with la lojbab on that one:
> >brivla are nicknames, NOT proper names.
>=20
> I don't see why that should be so. Seems quite arbitrary.
>=20
> >If you wish to make them names, use cmene that look similar
> >or end in non-final rafsi.
>=20
> My name is "selpa'i" and nothing else. I do not identify with any
> other string of letters. My name is not {.selpa'is.} and also not
> {.selpam.}, those are entirely different names.
>=20
> mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_478_19782396.1369980151351--