Received: from mail-yh0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:46726) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UjxUK-0005Gj-1r for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:06:00 -0700 Received: by mail-yh0-f61.google.com with SMTP id z6sf172615yhz.16 for ; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:05:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=5lPjb3JRMFBzOmL0RuwXd8Qhzq2TA8rJP155daNRuk8=; b=DOWz890+7Wa9l7HmVxG5TWYRAKgUrsse8uzQMOaN43LjNTmUtziLzoZWMQ0+1vKD63 BqbOu7/GILI92CLkism83T/uJETQ3EGKWs6PkD+jcP3gRxheEGKgLjUlnAoAF+fZF4Bs pzWV163pumiigiRFR7tyKfglIPQ6s0U5V3TrnHVlAFEIcQtOTxhmmPC9g6Yn8h5vrFts l9mJfmZBZzstIgZd2PcVp1qOBTu/k4Q1bOoS2DH9V1Wqv39ER+VPgtoxa9eUjeObxz78 CW+jDqLVizwXLDIrZbCA4lcHV+pDTQa8FPiwCRo2zxA8gvi8D+N742lOJ3MBPi0x5NAS UwZw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=5lPjb3JRMFBzOmL0RuwXd8Qhzq2TA8rJP155daNRuk8=; b=lp89KX+Ao8b3AKxnY/Z7oQPIPgulil4T2hvAuqxzQdqsh9+F/Vn72Km3Wnk2Q0Z4cR d9LpBzyXyGOBuo3POwYfWOxutjQ9eMewUAkpyKzX0ZmzqBYxt34cnni/bUsIyZmACO+P eT2Hg3/qKrZoBW7/7JG+iaTSFF1dPWT0F/NSPYzXlBrQKbe+CH/zMKfwHGPDSjme+LD7 PmxPqGt3Y8bEfleVbaWTnw5XJbcyD8RqmZ/p36jOrFgOTdAKTAGIOUvPjrivE8ud89K+ J/ZnbqJKGyG3IZuFz2+c2aLbNmGO5YnrLsMGRHkV23+g6k8l0Qyd2IdB9TlONFQFGZ52 xXWA== X-Received: by 10.50.1.79 with SMTP id 15mr409519igk.6.1370376341337; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:05:41 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.62.8 with SMTP id u8ls3070814igr.16.canary; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:05:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.30.129 with SMTP id s1mr2164949igh.0.1370376340224; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com [2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i6si220343igv.2.2013.06.04.13.05.40 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233; Received: by mail-ie0-x233.google.com with SMTP id c13so1458675ieb.38 for ; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:05:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.73.226 with SMTP id o2mr1822589igv.22.1370376339997; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.59.73 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 13:05:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7bb6cb21-7b04-4e93-984e-e8ce89fef8aa@googlegroups.com> <27282b11-5211-4e14-a97d-840ce27219ba@googlegroups.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:05:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Semantic categorisation of gismu From: Ian Johnson To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01161070f44a0a04de599ac4 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --089e01161070f44a0a04de599ac4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 .i mi na te pinka .i sa'u mi se plixau gi'e se cinri gi'e ckire mi'e la latro'a mu'o On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 6:34 AM, tijlan wrote: > ki'e la gleki > > I would be interested to see how different brivla are interrelated in > terms of their thematic relations. For example: > > porpi > spisa > daspo > > {porpi} and {spisa} have the same arguments (the whole and the part) in > reverse. They are also a dynamic/static counterpart to each other: > something dynamically *becomes* pieces, and something statically *is* a > piece. With {daspo}, an agent comes into the picture, causing something to > become other than its original self (to lose its original state), but > without specifying that resultant entity (whether spisa1, spofu1, or > something else). > > Many brivla don't have a static/dynamic counterpart. {morsi} is static > (something is dead) rather than dynamic (something dies). > > I like the notation used in the monograph below: > http://rickm.net16.net/lexical_semantics.html > It may be useful in the semantic analysis of brivla: > > porpi P/F-d > spisa F/P-s > daspo A/P-d > > morsi P-s > mrobi'o P-d > catra A/P/F-d > > viska P/F-s > catlu AP/F-s > > Both viska1 and catlu1 are a patient to the x2, but catlu1 is also an > agent to itself, keeping itself in the state of seeing something (it's an > agent-patient). (And, insofar as a "condition" place is optional for > {catlu}, viska3 may be considered equally extraneous and be left out of the > notation.) > > According to your list, {viska} and {tirna} belong to the same "Psycho: > Sensation/observation" class, as they should, but {tirna} doesn't have an > AP/F-s counterpart like {viska} does. This kind of analysis can cue us to > find lexical partiality and redundancy. > > > mu'o > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --089e01161070f44a0a04de599ac4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
.i mi na te pinka .i sa'u mi se plixau gi'e se cin= ri gi'e ckire

mi'e la latro'a mu'o=


O= n Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 6:34 AM, tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:
ki'e la gleki

I would be interested to see how differen= t brivla are interrelated in terms of their thematic relations. For example= :

porpi
spisa
daspo

{porpi} and {spisa} have the same arguments = (the whole and the part) in reverse. They are also a dynamic/static counter= part to each other: something dynamically *becomes* pieces, and something s= tatically *is* a piece. With {daspo}, an agent comes into the picture, caus= ing something to become other than its original self (to lose its original = state), but without specifying that resultant entity (whether spisa1, spofu= 1, or something else).

Many brivla don't have a static/dynamic counterpart. {morsi} is sta= tic (something is dead) rather than dynamic (something dies).

I like= the notation used in the monograph below:
http://rickm.net16.net/lexic= al_semantics.html
It may be useful in the semantic analysis of brivla:

porpi=A0=A0 P/F-d
spisa=A0=A0 F/P-s
daspo=A0=A0 A/P-d

morsi=A0=A0 P-s
mrobi'o=A0=A0 P-d
catra=A0=A0 A/P/F-d

viska=A0=A0 P/F-s
catlu=A0=A0 AP/F-s

Both viska1 and catlu1 are a pat= ient to the x2, but catlu1 is also an agent to itself, keeping itself in th= e state of seeing something (it's an agent-patient). (And, insofar as a= "condition" place is optional for {catlu}, viska3 may be conside= red equally extraneous and be left out of the notation.)

According to your list, {viska} and {tirna} belong to the sa= me "Psycho: Sensation/observation" class, as they should, but {ti= rna} doesn't have an AP/F-s counterpart like {viska} does. This kind of= analysis can cue us to find lexical partiality and redundancy.


mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
=A0
=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--089e01161070f44a0a04de599ac4--