Received: from mail-qc0-f184.google.com ([209.85.216.184]:38802) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UlgMu-0001Qr-JS for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 07:13:31 -0700 Received: by mail-qc0-f184.google.com with SMTP id b10sf202881qcw.21 for ; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 07:13:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id:x-ymail-osg :x-rocket-mimeinfo:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:reply-to :subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=VnJejeTYEA8bOzqPXvU7Sy3zlK/NbaxS60oGaZUBgqU=; b=fK3xzsluZ4LAzR+HJktcFwk0LdoHY00xi8D/D3DvTqrHePS9E/vLAHwQv2K16sIT/A /jm9jkN/ibNPyqGd7ecTiuD4Hm0vOXXNfBOM01c368pvrg8L/hPY1bPsh/qNU/H8LF/k Nubp1PltSs4qsMiT5PrGMoBySrQKH7dj2kkD2OkdGGltGpFxVhbosh/xs2Iyjk+yo9r/ Zv1vCP3mdTbxIpPpzxBB3gXmZjr9r/ZX5CK3W3IGBW08j65sSF41iCTQSywnZCdyI1EW uXcCnEnD6b7dT+3NWIESz0gGpvGPhC12OHZ2dfG1ZN6O07Y+bh4dvn4N7cRc1BfBLKv5 QYHg== X-Received: by 10.50.88.101 with SMTP id bf5mr443750igb.0.1370787190086; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 07:13:10 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.17.42 with SMTP id l10ls1584627igd.40.gmail; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 07:13:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.42.79.200 with SMTP id s8mr5493545ick.0.1370787189733; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 07:13:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm19.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm19.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com. [66.94.237.220]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z3si679588igz.1.2013.06.09.07.13.09 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 09 Jun 2013 07:13:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.220 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.94.237.220; Received: from [66.94.237.201] by nm19.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jun 2013 14:13:09 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.97] by tm12.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jun 2013 14:13:08 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1002.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jun 2013 14:13:08 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 528517.76089.bm@omp1002.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 59139 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jun 2013 14:13:08 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: NhkM2nMVM1mp9CDjh3_B4LIdI0nw8_7bIZWwPkHWqhbXCdr avQgK9xB.zCoCFuKE4pj5i20cYIcgm.wCRCPWpEaFvvWOrkIchawXHtw72fh oz6ia5RIZTaS8RzGRkvftGgdgHPLI7DN6VJYaxI96bjLzic_kPurAGfAIg2D pt3RHUycB1xZWosOLTP_os49Hu4DQXJvM265jXFqWXSXDsFWPXScZENJl_lA WS.7.dcWEheyB5JgO9YsCcfAICWJqtlzX5cQM9gfVzjHefbYxRqcDn9IYazo Fel.mk.fa9JbqJql7QGLazHSJkRXiI8BwwW42bLWK65TTbNK5CTVi3ZV9F73 1lCaPHVK4U6h_Og9sWymmE.D1si3FjgbyW3N50LwmHfKxwnH6Z0EGk9nTG9x esTI13P_CWttCuhO_BXDLQGEB9nu3nPg6ZyeQV_CeLjsOOH6G8qQKM4Jb2il CcZ_vPrLu.GlWekGykpVVVzeSvEndYJvIFBrJRckgIegAMS4LGLBLilK4FRy D24c0z3jpT.BmdNWw7PgNHDWePzTSjIkAZL2L1Ji9H2lsbzzxMiti8H3neuG 9Bp489JA8K8Y- Received: from [99.92.108.194] by web184406.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 07:13:07 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,T3B0aW1pc3RpYz_CoCBXZWxsLCBtYXliZSwgYnV0IEkgZG9uJ3QgZXhwZWN0IGl0IHRvIGNhdGNoIG9uIGFmdGVyIHRoZSBmaXJzdCBwZXJzb24gcmVmZXJzIHRvIHRoZSBjb21pYyBhcyB7bGEgdWl9CgoKCgpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwogRnJvbTogdjRobiA8bWVAdjRobi5kZT4KVG86IGxvamJhbkBnb29nbGVncm91cHMuY29tIApTZW50OiBTdW5kYXksIEp1bmUgOSwgMjAxMyA4OjM1IEFNClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBbbG9qYmFuXSBjbWV2bGEgYXMgYSBjbGFzcyBvZiBicml2bGEBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.145.547 References: <51A6685C.3010505@lojban.org> <51A8680E.7040103@lojban.org> <51A8F326.2020901@lojban.org> <51A8F89D.2040408@gmx.de> <51B00097.8080004@lojban.org> <51B06D24.6020102@gmx.de> <51B46762.8080509@lojban.org> <51B47305.4020704@gmx.de> <20130609133526.GD24964@samsa.fritz.box> Message-ID: <1370787187.52953.YahooMailNeo@web184406.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 07:13:07 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" In-Reply-To: <20130609133526.GD24964@samsa.fritz.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.220 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1789658926-888786176-1370787187=:52953" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --1789658926-888786176-1370787187=:52953 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Optimistic?=A0 Well, maybe, but I don't expect it to catch on after the fir= st person refers to the comic as {la ui} ________________________________ From: v4hn To: lojban@googlegroups.com=20 Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2013 8:35 AM Subject: Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla =20 coi rodo On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 02:20:21PM +0200, selpa'i wrote: > la .lojbab. cu cusku di'e > >Those exceptions are in fact significant - they are examples of the > >brivla (or whatever word) being taken as a string of symbols/sounds that > >exists on it own regardless of which word or kind of word that it is. It > >would seem that you want names to be another example of a string of > >symbols taken as such a standalone language unit. >=20 > Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying they are. I thought I had made > that clear. A name is a word (or multiple words) used to refer to > some entity, irrespective of what that word might mean. Fine, finally you guys managed to formulate ba'e how your opinions differ. > >But that isn't the case for Lojban. >=20 > You seem to be alone in thinking that (see other people's responses). Hold it right there. He's definitely not. It's just that some people who produce most noise - not judging whether this is good or bad - on this = list oppose it. That doesn't mean nobody else has the same opinion. I also assume most people don't care at all wondering why there's so much f= uss over this. > But the accepted definition of {la} is: > > la broda =3D=3D lo selcme be zo broda No, it is not. The last "accepted" "definition" of {la} is in xorlo which s= tates la [PA] broda - zo'e noi lu [PA] broda li'u cmene ke'a mi I'm not sure that is the same thing. At least the full structure of the sub= sentence includes {zo'e}s, so you can't get around them at all levels. Another rather simple observation: Whether or not {la selpa'i} is decided to have some semantic connection to {prami}, you're not able to = make people ignore connotations of the word you're uttering. Psychological fact (if such things even exist). Therefore, if I read {la tsani}, I will think of the person AND I will thin= k of sky. Same for {selpa'i}. So if you don't want me to think of "beloved" when I read about you, pick a different name. John E Clifford wrote: > The new understanding of {la} would technically open the > path to all that, but custom is sure to intervene and prevent the worst o= f it, > I hope. sei palci cmila do ba'e krici xu You're optimistic. If it's allowed and even pointed out, people will do it. Especially in an online community were morals barely exist in the first pla= ce. v4hn --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --1789658926-888786176-1370787187=:52953 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Optimistic?  Wel= l, maybe, but I don't expect it to catch on after the first person refers t= o the comic as {la ui}



From: v4hn <= ;me@v4hn.de>
To: lo= jban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2013 8:35 AM
Subject: Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla
=

coi rodo

On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 02:20:21PM +0200, selpa'i wrote:> la .lojbab. cu cusku di'e
> >Those exceptions are in fact si= gnificant - they are examples of the
> >brivla (or whatever word) = being taken as a string of symbols/sounds that
> >exists on it own= regardless of which word or kind of word that it is. It
> >would = seem that you want names to be another example of a string of
> >s= ymbols taken as such a standalone language unit.
>
> Yes, that= 's exactly what I'm saying they are. I thought I had made
> that clea= r. A name is a word (or multiple words) used to refer to
> some entit= y, irrespective of what that word might mean.

Fine, finally you guys= managed to formulate ba'e how your opinions differ.

> >But th= at isn't the case for Lojban.
>
> You seem to be alone in thin= king that (see other people's responses).

Hold it right there. He's definitely not. It's just that some people
who produce most= noise - not judging whether this is good or bad - on this list
oppose i= t. That doesn't mean nobody else has the same opinion.
I also assume mos= t people don't care at all wondering why there's so much fuss
over this.=

> But the accepted definition of {la} is:
>
> la bro= da =3D=3D lo selcme be zo broda

No, it is not. The last "accepted" "= definition" of {la} is in xorlo which states

la [PA] broda - zo'e no= i lu [PA] broda li'u cmene ke'a mi

I'm not sure that is the same thi= ng. At least the full structure of the subsentence
includes {zo'e}s, so = you can't get around them at all levels.

Another rather simple obser= vation: Whether or not {la selpa'i}
is decided to have some semantic con= nection to {prami}, you're not able to make
people ignore connotations o= f the word you're uttering.
Psychological fact (if such things even exist).
Therefore, if I read {la tsani}, I will think of the person AND= I will think
of sky. Same for {selpa'i}. So if you don't want me to thi= nk of "beloved"
when I read about you, pick a different name.

Joh= n E Clifford wrote:
> The new understanding of {la} would technically= open the
> path to all that, but custom is sure to intervene and pre= vent the worst of it,
> I hope.

sei palci cmila do ba'e krici = xu

You're optimistic. If it's allowed and even pointed out, people w= ill do it.
Especially in an online community were morals barely exist in= the first place.


v4hn


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--1789658926-888786176-1370787187=:52953--