Received: from mail-ob0-f190.google.com ([209.85.214.190]:33569) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UlinO-0002S5-MM for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 09:48:59 -0700 Received: by mail-ob0-f190.google.com with SMTP id up14sf1765797obb.17 for ; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 09:48:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:x-ct-class:x-ct-score:x-ct-refid:x-ct-spam :x-authority-analysis:x-cm-score:message-id:date:from:organization :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=vbIsN0qXy/LLUZ0vvrQFjwtZmJIDA1/1OSjxyZuVB1Y=; b=tMMW3e2YXpFZhP+SqjPtAfXjVZgX7SXnXVr0rJ3Ko5b8nFUZeWFF+Emc+/DHOwybjf MWvHiT0wnxSN6EQUsAyrAxHTg5b8xgO23FU0wnFm23QbvT+euYcSJ2sl+u8/w2TRKhec SXKYFeQQytZBUlJDwvz/8gTQenwlfly9Kkyqvl2pmAnGcaJwklaNWFZBsLcefZsISeq8 MmRFA8/hBlU2OL0g5aUV15780SU5Y5sxRtYn0NPoYIU71tKmxIH5SYUBr/VPJOY5rsXc 0IhdwKjjeODHw3hP+iWeVbl0aq/C8o1wgyn8iwDp0PlGxmPhVoBgFw2Q/b3X5rs33S1L SLmw== X-Received: by 10.49.49.67 with SMTP id s3mr257839qen.29.1370796519128; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 09:48:39 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.88.42 with SMTP id bd10ls2368703qeb.16.gmail; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 09:48:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.224.42.141 with SMTP id s13mr6349389qae.3.1370796518569; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 09:48:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmfepo102.cox.net (eastrmfepo102.cox.net. [68.230.241.214]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id u10si632686qco.0.2013.06.09.09.48.37 for ; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 09:48:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.214 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) client-ip=68.230.241.214; Received: from eastrmimpo110 ([68.230.241.223]) by eastrmfepo102.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.09 201-2260-151-124-20120717) with ESMTP id <20130609164837.FXKV14166.eastrmfepo102.cox.net@eastrmimpo110> for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 12:48:37 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([72.209.248.61]) by eastrmimpo110 with cox id mGod1l00D1LDWBL01Godjs; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 12:48:37 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020202.51B4B1E5.0082,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=NeA4IR/4 c=1 sm=1 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:17 a=YsUzL_8ObRgA:10 a=kGrBj7_89DgA:10 a=xmHE3fpoGJwA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=80FJE3sM9_cA:10 a=hP1eiOcWsJdm2Tnf6I0A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=dxBpO5_FDU0A:10 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <51B4B1E5.7070704@lojban.org> Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 12:48:37 -0400 From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla References: <51A379EF.3020803@gmx.de> <51A6685C.3010505@lojban.org> <51A8680E.7040103@lojban.org> <51A8F326.2020901@lojban.org> <51A8F89D.2040408@gmx.de> <51B00097.8080004@lojban.org> <51B06D24.6020102@gmx.de> <51B46762.8080509@lojban.org> <51B47305.4020704@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <51B47305.4020704@gmx.de> X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.214 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 1 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: selpa'i wrote: >> I am saying that as far as Lojban is concerned "{la tsani} and {la tsani >> be zo'e}" are linguistically equivalent, and there is no way to say "la >> tsani" such that it DOESN'T include a possible value in the unspecified >> places; they are there and they are "zo'e", if nothing else. > > I understand your position. However, I doubt la tsani would agree that > his name is "tsani be zo'e". [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid selpa'i wrote: >> I am saying that as far as Lojban is concerned "{la tsani} and {la tsani >> be zo'e}" are linguistically equivalent, and there is no way to say "la >> tsani" such that it DOESN'T include a possible value in the unspecified >> places; they are there and they are "zo'e", if nothing else. > > I understand your position. However, I doubt la tsani would agree that > his name is "tsani be zo'e". I'm on the point of asking "why should I care what la tsani would agree that his name is?" His legal name is whatever the government accepts as his legal name. His name in usage is whatever someone chooses to call him. > It's not the same name as it is a different string of sounds. It doesn't matter whether it is the same name. All a name is, is a method of identifying a referent. All names which identify the same referent are names for that referent. >> And dotside or no dotside, I will never accept someone's choice of name >> to be "la" %^) > > That's your private business, but don't expect everyone else to follow > your personal preference here. You seem unable to recognize a joke even if explicitly marked as one. lojbab -- Bob LeChevalier lojbab@lojban.org www.lojban.org President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.