Received: from mail-ob0-f190.google.com ([209.85.214.190]:40686) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UljLf-0002lC-3n for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:24:21 -0700 Received: by mail-ob0-f190.google.com with SMTP id up14sf1769722obb.17 for ; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:24:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:x-ct-class:x-ct-score:x-ct-refid:x-ct-spam :x-authority-analysis:x-cm-score:message-id:date:from:organization :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aJTuPGPOpKaygiRSJE4Hb4WsQ8eQTviXDvxlggXrGjU=; b=O8acnCZVVD9A0DL91YRGrIcP2ATioWjZAS94ayH5pLgytvt+ci9X6d/ai2stA+VgPZ BlBEIDyOrxC6csibbUEB6Zr8wl7ALPlHHsc/YSZRzBW5RH4SIE9ugj03tE4mbS2VTYj+ 2ww9SFojdHosa23mNFtkc96v1DQUvoADR7oZM/EPq+bsWKxPU9RTsCtBe6IusKRQu0F0 mvsL6uxCvtqG56jy8crMzGdfY6Jt0vGWNhlN7qFUdMLUXpTA1/WpmR9F6wOJ4CGeDKqj utQ7tK97A/ktfoT4c5V+3taSuIbzAlEXLOS6KnHQlHS49JyNaFWEipTU/wRz6uWVMrYC 4FyQ== X-Received: by 10.49.97.104 with SMTP id dz8mr280567qeb.15.1370798644519; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:24:04 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.52.40 with SMTP id q8ls2498424qeo.1.gmail; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:24:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.224.200.202 with SMTP id ex10mr6444272qab.8.1370798643902; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:24:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmfepo202.cox.net (eastrmfepo202.cox.net. [68.230.241.217]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id u7si325557qcp.2.2013.06.09.10.24.03 for ; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:24:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.217 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) client-ip=68.230.241.217; Received: from eastrmimpo305 ([68.230.241.237]) by eastrmfepo202.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.09 201-2260-151-124-20120717) with ESMTP id <20130609172403.YRLM14810.eastrmfepo202.cox.net@eastrmimpo305> for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 13:24:03 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([72.209.248.61]) by eastrmimpo305 with cox id mHQ21l00R1LDWBL01HQ2K1; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 13:24:03 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020208.51B4BA33.0039,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=c8x1t2Bl c=1 sm=1 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:17 a=YsUzL_8ObRgA:10 a=kGrBj7_89DgA:10 a=xmHE3fpoGJwA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=80FJE3sM9_cA:10 a=sJgOW-UrA49cDlFTEO4A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=dxBpO5_FDU0A:10 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <51B4BA33.1030507@lojban.org> Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 13:24:03 -0400 From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla References: <51A379EF.3020803@gmx.de> <51A6685C.3010505@lojban.org> <51A8680E.7040103@lojban.org> <51A8F326.2020901@lojban.org> <51A8F89D.2040408@gmx.de> <51B00097.8080004@lojban.org> <51B06D24.6020102@gmx.de> <51B46762.8080509@lojban.org> <1370781558.18791.YahooMailNeo@web184404.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.217 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - > LLG > wrote: > > > And dotside or no dotside, I will never accept someone's choice of > name to be "la" %^) > > > Dotside or no dotside, the word "la" cannot be a name by itself > (although it can be part of a name, as in "la broda be la brode", where > the second "la" is a part of the name, but that has nothing to do with > dotside). I agree. But the argument that I was responding to seems to indicate=20 that anything marked with "la" is just a string being treated as a name=20 with no semantic content in the same way that "zo" turns a string into a=20 sumti with no semantic content. > All dotside does I know what dotside does, and was just making a joke about one extreme=20 possibility of treating any old word-string as a name. That was=20 certainly not the intent in allowing LA to take a sumti-tail description=20 alongside LE. lojbab --=20 Bob LeChevalier lojbab@lojban.org www.lojban.org President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.