Received: from mail-fa0-f64.google.com ([209.85.161.64]:52759) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UljsA-00030p-3H for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:58:01 -0700 Received: by mail-fa0-f64.google.com with SMTP id v1sf103877fav.19 for ; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:57:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=6HqLtFb6s4+LFk52z0TODKufcR3D6KOpKfHrWr7j3Go=; b=qfbmLdYHI/xsoCsVRJGr+OG/fdKorTmzrAgxcMM0UI3WUunH7LVONgJ4DUoUQ5/Y7z FjsJgm+uSReUSvRBNH3YVgUhM9tV65D0iEeurI/mPJzOHxPb9afIeJ7XuH/adW3LF3M7 xmAoHALlfCCy38WELQ5+GtgHM9cDog4G34InoWbHYwd4mfCruFS/PLUIQrL6NFwShTRd wWZ4i8k8Q1gFEjzcMrZ8PDmWgYlL9BnIhq5zzTGDvxf6RBTwCsuEmRDF7hnPyxhUY0Sm Zj69yxPE3jO31GAKK3u0TjwkK7gxfGcsXmmYJDTfhUK/RjEITzPdNIssOR248rr3qSHO JEfg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=6HqLtFb6s4+LFk52z0TODKufcR3D6KOpKfHrWr7j3Go=; b=livM1uwNyl4Y8kFYwNWruUwpWe+svltuGaJnM/ZFqgrVnYvySCkvWCRklF8ux79uzp gy5S0CvPm4ykn9ANs9h11Hop6GZFkbpl848g/vqR4IZG15Vt+ufRC0d2Sj16HRtJgBk7 IzCb/ntzEHe7fPoDTRaalCOp2aJu+KnkOuw0+FpIR2lpgh7FI3TOU3qiESqFRLQ5akhl 27HASvjNr5PXijk3bYVTDJL9a9bBDVpkMlb/95DEkbOUG1e7VrgojMny9X7JWGjDIp/E FRkZ3BGa+LIb3Hep+i41PBcQE+2D1H9xL/WXlG62h0gTEEvPNCi5czoA6/j9GEy6CGmR GOsQ== X-Received: by 10.180.10.234 with SMTP id l10mr239280wib.0.1370800658617; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:57:38 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.106.195 with SMTP id gw3ls642409wib.51.gmail; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:57:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.204.71.134 with SMTP id h6mr309972bkj.8.1370800657959; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x22e.google.com (mail-la0-x22e.google.com [2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rl1si478870bkb.3.2013.06.09.10.57.37 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e; Received: by mail-la0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id eg20so5109437lab.33 for ; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:57:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.140.231 with SMTP id rj7mr5085081lbb.16.1370800657732; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.21.38 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 10:57:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51B47305.4020704@gmx.de> References: <51A379EF.3020803@gmx.de> <51A6685C.3010505@lojban.org> <51A8680E.7040103@lojban.org> <51A8F326.2020901@lojban.org> <51A8F89D.2040408@gmx.de> <51B00097.8080004@lojban.org> <51B06D24.6020102@gmx.de> <51B46762.8080509@lojban.org> <51B47305.4020704@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 11:57:37 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c26a30431cae04debc66cd X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --001a11c26a30431cae04debc66cd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:20 AM, selpa'i wrote: > la .lojbab. cu cusku di'e > >> Those exceptions are in fact significant - they are examples of the >> >> brivla (or whatever word) being taken as a string of symbols/sounds that >> exists on it own regardless of which word or kind of word that it is. It >> would seem that you want names to be another example of a string of >> symbols taken as such a standalone language unit. >> > > Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying they are. I thought I had made that > clear. A name is a word (or multiple words) used to refer to some entity, > irrespective of what that word might mean. > > > But that isn't the case for Lojban. >> > > You seem to be alone in thinking that (see other people's responses). > He's not. > As you say, {zo tsani} is just the "standalone language unit" "tsani", the > word itself, without any hidden places. But the accepted definition of {la} > is: > > la broda == lo selcme be zo broda > > So you must have a different definition of {la} than everyone else. > > > I am saying that as far as Lojban is concerned "{la tsani} and {la tsani >> be zo'e}" are linguistically equivalent, and there is no way to say "la >> tsani" such that it DOESN'T include a possible value in the unspecified >> places; they are there and they are "zo'e", if nothing else. >> > > I understand your position. However, I doubt la tsani would agree that his > name is "tsani be zo'e". It's not the same name as it is a different string > of sounds. > > > And dotside or no dotside, I will never accept someone's choice of name >> to be "la" %^) >> > > That's your private business, but don't expect everyone else to follow > your personal preference here. I also don't see how dotside is relevant to > this. > > > mu'o mi'e la selpa'i > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com > . > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group/lojban?hl=en > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out > . > > > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --001a11c26a30431cae04debc66cd Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:20 AM, selpa'i <selad= wa@gmx.de> wrote:
la .lojbab. cu cusku di'e
Those exceptions are in fact significant - they are examples of the

brivla (or whatever word) being taken as a string of symbols/sounds that exists on it own regardless of which word or kind of word that it is. It would seem that you want names to be another example of a string of
symbols taken as such a standalone language unit.

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying they are. I thought I had made = that clear. A name is a word (or multiple words) used to refer to some enti= ty, irrespective of what that word might mean.


But that isn't the case for Lojban.

You seem to be alone in thinking that (see other people's responses).

He's not.
=A0
As you say, {zo tsani} is just the "standalone language unit" &qu= ot;tsani", the word itself, without any hidden places. But the accepte= d definition of {la} is:

la broda =3D=3D lo selcme be zo broda

So you must have a different definition of {la} than everyone else.


I am saying that as far as Lojban is concerned "{la tsani} and {la tsa= ni
be zo'e}" are linguistically equivalent, and there is no way to sa= y "la
tsani" such that it DOESN'T include a possible value in the unspec= ified
places; they are there and they are "zo'e", if nothing else.<= br>

I understand your position. However, I doubt la tsani would agree that his = name is "tsani be zo'e". It's not the same name as it is = a different string of sounds.


And dotside or no dotside, I will never accept someone's choice of name=
to be "la" %^)

That's your private business, but don't expect everyone else to fol= low your personal preference here. I also don't see how dotside is rele= vant to this.


mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--001a11c26a30431cae04debc66cd--