Received: from mail-qc0-f184.google.com ([209.85.216.184]:37128) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UlrlI-0005u3-Vu for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 19:23:30 -0700 Received: by mail-qc0-f184.google.com with SMTP id b10sf305367qcw.11 for ; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 19:23:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=4aRuSAzTM0Chr7C2GAo14WpR0x4oG1J+Ppqhzr0bT70=; b=vXv4dFqNrVku3+exMBV1gqqif9ecKeaIQlDETdjlJDJ20aswN49h/8e9wwS2XNkrDN po4xskLCsq7Ga6NxP0S4OStAlh6i05tvpEZTfAzzFTG3aWDLGPyEufYQk2vZxl8G/q+w Uc+BXUDDmhomXaBztPjrxtmZxs3/xJR6dsGbDwwOl0kxz1taRRoQ6y+9cVG+tNNKIrnR Ko2vp3RsqNvwCQePURG8CH+hPtpkXt12OaW4Un8TRzgA2IrtCi2kbnryQ1R7Ore0VGnC 5Xf0OyJQdJM3JGlN4kH9jdGpPw4HZCD9Uau2AizzrzZ6N10t5qvVknhuJOa7zDY1hMqS /YQg== X-Received: by 10.49.35.133 with SMTP id h5mr291929qej.20.1370830985915; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 19:23:05 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.97.4 with SMTP id dw4ls2539872qeb.58.gmail; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 19:23:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.21.198 with SMTP id r46mr4849715yhr.12.1370830983840; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 19:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chausie ([2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id y4si522049yhi.3.2013.06.09.19.23.03 for ; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 19:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5; Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9972E2F5B for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 22:23:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] cmevla as a class of brivla Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 22:23:02 -0400 Message-ID: <1572136.Rc9a1FkyGG@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-44-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1370809200.78493.YahooMailNeo@web184405.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <51A6685C.3010505@lojban.org> <1370809200.78493.YahooMailNeo@web184405.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) smtp.mail=phma@bezitopo.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Sunday, June 09, 2013 13:20:00 John E Clifford wrote: > The name-others distinction in logic is not about function (although tha= t, > too) but about form. Could Lojban names look just like other expressions?= =20 > They don't, but that is not the issue. >=20 > What kind of a predicate is {djan zei pol}?=20 A predicate with completely unclear place structure. How about=20 "sapir.zei.uorf"? On Sunday, June 09, 2013 17:09:14 Robert LeChevalier wrote: > Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > > I'm also pretty sure your problem is not with that. You oppose the merg= e > > of CMEVLA with BRIVLA because you oppose any changes to the language. >=20 > I do so oppose - prior to the documentation baseline. I've actually > not taken a position on the so-called "merge" proposal, as I think has > been described in the thread. I oppose this merge both before and after the baseline. On Sunday, June 09, 2013 14:16:24 John E Clifford wrote: > My understanding of the cumulative effect of dotside is that every *name* > must be surrounded by glottal stops (which otherwise do not except betwee= n > final and initial vowels, i.e., phonemically conditioned). Thus, > {.paris.rom.} is distinct from {. paris rom.} ".paris.rom." is identical to ".paris rom.". Both are one cmene composed of= =20 two cmevla. ".paris,rom." is identical to ".parisrom.". Both are one single= =20 cmevla. Taking C=F4te d'Ivoire as an example, ".kot.divuar." and ".kot divuar." are= the=20 same, whereas ".kot,divuar." and ".kotdivuar." are both invalid because a= =20 voiced stop cannot be next to a voiceless stop. Pierre --=20 loi mintu se ckaji danlu cu jmaji --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.