Received: from mail-oa0-f57.google.com ([209.85.219.57]:33201) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UoCwT-0000kU-Md for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:24:37 -0700 Received: by mail-oa0-f57.google.com with SMTP id o6sf744235oag.22 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:24:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=YlHiD1noTz5gK3V8CdDihQliAy6haXoFscZ1tM8DLf0=; b=nMRWOFSMEbL3Xn8DFdcAC6mpRV2L4aJImGDT+3s68VpyavtIMqTvt6YQZKM1pkNnuv JVK6HJAfH1FJDH9wy/sqDJ2HAxMhqmRFI6iKXOL+uT4GR0+ccWwov6Rh/PBAhvH3Equc obPMRI3r6TH3bfJRR0nQxs62WOopgpURcxss8UNzpG+1QGrkTALaRGx493LqQ6r2Bfa5 Hl0tyOs/5rvI79skOLHkdhYk7hQbaUPbvexztV2IvF9Vc2WXDerjhP2o/b4x8x0wAWNk cuBq0m6VlLB9O1+Jz3EroVgp1+zAUC1dLBuk91OGdXl9Kja5ERyAyPcZ8z/NwcvTpPlx PpbQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=YlHiD1noTz5gK3V8CdDihQliAy6haXoFscZ1tM8DLf0=; b=KZdea1kjC9OrfW5QhlV7SmHIgOM/8Jq+dCTtLeMPX++feBNb8HKYKMvemZvBtJZSGB IRST8GerxpTNq2W1nNCZxqxHA6NFjziCP8JzJyPpfjx7jL5MC8kcfXy6nsc1O1gk5YE5 fQtOHZroT/Tyw1XUrn5y5pMSEKzk5G4+DaLwLWL4ru82zPY0zwmLLNkCbth76JxlNZ26 FOUz/7cWvuPO+JUC3T16cEFPqdPy98s8eivrCacaz10n3q4mr2WRioypZquMqC1KnLZL k4uMyQxGiYvWR+s67WqdD/JhYYPEIt1m4gq+X4IMALPeY0c6iE4YAXuPcMYJXU3nom9y MyJA== X-Received: by 10.49.105.229 with SMTP id gp5mr266404qeb.35.1371389058262; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:24:18 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.62.166 with SMTP id z6ls786295qer.71.gmail; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:24:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.11.140 with SMTP id q12mr24443qeb.9.1371389057626; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:24:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:24:17 -0700 (PDT) From: la arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <83db19ea-d3b5-42f4-bb96-a96824a1065e@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <5556916.ZnGeyDiHF3@caracal> References: <8561d566-8f8b-4b46-9e7b-5fdbc1367b33@googlegroups.com> <5556916.ZnGeyDiHF3@caracal> Subject: Re: [lojban] "we" and masses. A bug in the CLL? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2728_31809318.1371389057397" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_2728_31809318.1371389057397 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sunday, June 16, 2013 5:04:08 PM UTC+4, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > On Saturday, June 15, 2013 22:11:01 la arxokuna wrote: > > However, jvs has two > definitions, > > the second one (by selpahi) defining {mi'o} as "mi jo'u do" entered in > > December 2012. I don't remember any discussions of this issue at that > time. > > > > I don't know if it should be {ro mi'o bevri} vs. {lu'o mi'o bevri} or > > {ro lu'a mi'o bevri} vs. {lu'o mi'o bevri}. > > > > So should we change the CLL to say it means {jo'u}, not {joi}? > > Lojban lacks grammatical number, even in pronouns, but has clusivity. I > thought they were ambiguous as to whether they mean individuals or masses; > if > you want to specify, you can say "lu'o" or "lu'a". > So I think we now all agree that we have to put this to the CLL Errata page. > > Pierre > -- > ve ka'a ro klaji la .romas. se jmaji > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_2728_31809318.1371389057397 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sunday, June 16, 2013 5:04:08 PM UTC+4, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Saturday, June 15, 2013 22:11:01 la arxokuna wrote:
> However, jvs <http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/mi%27o> has two definitions,
> the second one (by selpahi) defining  {mi'o} as "mi jo'u do" entered in
> December 2012. I don't remember any discussions of this issue at that time.
>
> I don't know if  it should be  {ro mi'o bevri} vs. {lu'o mi'o bevri}  or
> {ro lu'a mi'o bevri} vs. {lu'o mi'o bevri}.
>
> So should we change the CLL to say it means {jo'u}, not {joi}?

Lojban lacks grammatical number, even in pronouns, but has clusivity. I
thought they were ambiguous as to whether they mean individuals or masses; if
you want to specify, you can say "lu'o" or "lu'a".

So I think we now all agree that we have to put this to the CLL Errata page.
 

Pierre
--
ve ka'a ro klaji la .romas. se jmaji

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_2728_31809318.1371389057397--