Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 23:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <fe420003-35a6-45b3-a9cd-e2c428b979ea@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ8VDWvOUw7r2RFOhuLmF0cssAE5LEUUKJ1QtJOUBsKzroi9w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3729f7bd-3aa6-499c-9a20-4b3d040d3ad8@googlegroups.com>
 <CA+gZtg+Z5G30sNjBiOtOxFwE5Js=4uwM3T9Sd2MftKHxjoG88Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOQ8VDVOxKYbUoRCPDoLPpMxxWFobVQ=j0wStj=JDobXzwYS_A@mail.gmail.com> <b22c720e-ccb3-43af-ad2c-0db522e5844a@googlegroups.com>
 <CAOQ8VDWvOUw7r2RFOhuLmF0cssAE5LEUUKJ1QtJOUBsKzroi9w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] A bug in the CLL 7.6 example 6.14).
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_266_25596668.1371536129010"
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

------=_Part_266_25596668.1371536129010
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I have a question. Is a {sei} bridi in a bridi called an embedded bridi? 
For example,

1) ko'a ko'e sei nei brode se'u broda
2) ko'a ko'e sei no'a brode se'u broda
In which sentence is {broda} repeated, or neither? 

On the other hand, I think a {to} sentence in a bridi is neither an 
embedded sentence nor a part of the bridi in this context. For example,
3) ko'a ko'e to nei brode toi broda
4) ko'a ko'e to no'a brode toi broda
in neither 3) nor 4), {broda} is repeated; or am I wrong?

A {sei} bridi is grammatically a free modifier just like a {to} sentence, 
but semantically a metalinguistic bridi, which is somehow similar in 
meaning to {BAI lonu} bridi, which is clearly an embedded bridi, in which 
{no'a} works.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


------=_Part_266_25596668.1371536129010
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div>I have a question. Is a {sei} bridi in a bridi called an embedded brid=
i? For example,</div><div><br></div><div>1) ko'a ko'e sei nei brode se'u br=
oda</div><div>2) ko'a ko'e sei no'a brode se'u broda</div><div>In which sen=
tence is {broda} repeated, or neither?&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>On th=
e other hand, I think a {to} sentence in a bridi is neither an embedded sen=
tence nor a part of the bridi in this context. For example,</div><div>3) ko=
'a ko'e to nei brode toi broda</div><div>4) ko'a ko'e to no'a brode toi bro=
da</div><div>in neither 3) nor 4), {broda} is repeated; or am I wrong?</div=
><div><br></div><div>A {sei} bridi is grammatically a free modifier just li=
ke a {to} sentence, but semantically a metalinguistic bridi, which is someh=
ow similar in meaning to {BAI lonu} bridi, which is clearly an embedded bri=
di, in which {no'a} works.</div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out=
">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />

------=_Part_266_25596668.1371536129010--