Received: from mail-qa0-f64.google.com ([209.85.216.64]:52450) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UorxT-0000Bk-1H for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:12:16 -0700 Received: by mail-qa0-f64.google.com with SMTP id n10sf1280655qao.19 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:12:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=nHLJPYQ+pqvDFbKlj3QfLEv5+UNPUx9lXov87qHlEkw=; b=HqlBV4f22jJD2G7kRHRH/+eMyeee5a4EMMrhpyGeXI+qrA9DFDqTU3KoJBPS/zkzCe /4Qu2FZWklq+zhv7kOqj9OrEIBGJ+nCvMf19AGWCr/y89AJ+fRxknSajG8zzvkSM4/q6 WUraM4ChJqGK4xduJh+ZYqWqr1dfAaD6/8/ZtC266kIaiKMyovtEgT685IrOXOVk/7El ibJtdeaxQvLjoejNSjCfgEsaUPpvemdRCmmZPSXGA7RRLLPBbeRdq1sKMdPGWiWbQysb ao1FzL/PuKPtaDhxrS9Xeyb+VjlmfJ/yxLF5x0vhNXF58Kws9/Pbl3046/eM45PAeM+f 2iOA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=nHLJPYQ+pqvDFbKlj3QfLEv5+UNPUx9lXov87qHlEkw=; b=Gwu+2qXLRnyHwLC1MkzZzkKnn5UnyiTbtR9mP5vTbevQKhUD4TqjtFmT0svk+uCXdN t6lu5dkww0xFn/VcjXNw5QMdEGNumR+S4PfZvvDR62fPC5eyUG2ROHKlLz67nK4yi2fJ sXxoMdKCAFeXDc2yrChTNjMwiMmY133y0otJmsfNp8caVuTTxftBulmxmfJnK+zog7f+ RBmFu42QgZSZY1QluAovEjQ8CUOlrNVTMfvwakhnYWCT87ur7ealTGG4rzsx736lsoBL t/mO0L5bOQzXvtLWe2PyWEbsLTXSe6LH7Z2NF7zCpo1AYtHdO8PfbI/Pf5dioEhROp/C cjUA== X-Received: by 10.49.4.136 with SMTP id k8mr467062qek.19.1371546723989; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:12:03 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.24.236 with SMTP id x12ls1413771qef.99.gmail; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:12:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.116.115 with SMTP id jv19mr445980qeb.22.1371546723300; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:12:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:12:02 -0700 (PDT) From: la arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <3729f7bd-3aa6-499c-9a20-4b3d040d3ad8@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] A bug in the CLL 7.6 example 6.14). MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4830_11867868.1371546722771" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_4830_11867868.1371546722771 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 10:15:28 AM UTC+4, guskant wrote: > > I have a question. Is a {sei} bridi in a bridi called an embedded bridi? > For example, > > 1) ko'a ko'e sei nei brode se'u broda > 2) ko'a ko'e sei no'a brode se'u broda > In which sentence is {broda} repeated, or neither? > > On the other hand, I think a {to} sentence in a bridi is neither an > embedded sentence nor a part of the bridi in this context. For example, > 3) ko'a ko'e to nei brode toi broda > 4) ko'a ko'e to no'a brode toi broda > in neither 3) nor 4), {broda} is repeated; or am I wrong? > > A {sei} bridi is grammatically a free modifier just like a {to} sentence, > but semantically a metalinguistic bridi, which is somehow similar in > meaning to {BAI lonu} bridi, which is clearly an embedded bridi, in which > {no'a} works. > I can only answer to the last sentence. in {broda fi'o brode lo nu brodi} broda is actually embedded inside *brode*. As it's roughly expanded into {lo nu broda cu se brode lo nu brodi}. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_4830_11867868.1371546722771 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 10:15:28 AM UTC+4, guskant wrote:
I have a question. Is a {sei} bri= di in a bridi called an embedded bridi? For example,

1) ko'a ko'e sei nei brode se'u broda
2) ko'a ko'e sei no'a br= ode se'u broda
In which sentence is {broda} repeated, or neither?=  

On the other hand, I think a {to} sentence = in a bridi is neither an embedded sentence nor a part of the bridi in this = context. For example,
3) ko'a ko'e to nei brode toi broda
4) ko'a ko'e to no'a brode toi broda
in neither 3) nor 4), {br= oda} is repeated; or am I wrong?

A {sei} bridi is = grammatically a free modifier just like a {to} sentence, but semantically a= metalinguistic bridi, which is somehow similar in meaning to {BAI lonu} br= idi, which is clearly an embedded bridi, in which {no'a} works.

I can only answer to the last sentence.

in {broda fi'o brode lo nu brodi} broda is actually embedd= ed inside *brode*. As it's roughly expanded into

{= lo nu broda cu se brode lo nu brodi}.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_4830_11867868.1371546722771--