Received: from mail-ob0-f183.google.com ([209.85.214.183]:33148) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UpJL8-0004nZ-Ai for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:26:39 -0700 Received: by mail-ob0-f183.google.com with SMTP id xk17sf1822570obc.0 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:26:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=FhyZBo5RFzQ35ad5M+ZIsMk9WXGVv5giByU3ut2o8hI=; b=vT0FueguKCBLUxHjnLTUSzwRUO0VAp6LttCW+j3UBhbpL7wOeTYrq4gpZtko2ttwNr +Eiwqyr0dmY7ro4MXEhi17NPk9br304a185AIDtHBHlTuKc6OAPW5wm8jqp8v3L689nZ tFrmmpezG/stTj6t8mvmPC9mKV3wcOUxi2ocvhpH3JyAXiWNVcIa4cptX2D9bdkYPmEg U4qNy7nS3wdHu82qbkLBcey45A5xEKeP9o2++LxQbb/lvFvVdHeFeLHdpGnkBb5c5/k1 8hhgJnJ8RpZzwYUZg2L59L+b/mh/pmoNuBa/Ka0WnRuRq1FMr/nUEMXcW2QOH5vY06GO c0WQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=FhyZBo5RFzQ35ad5M+ZIsMk9WXGVv5giByU3ut2o8hI=; b=TQsWF9ThJ/q+hvxj7egZ0O58N0RGYe3T0+xF1mHepDqBJOEQQnaU11zd7PkmBFyTMo xOfQulcO1Kk4SelT6ksrW9Dq8Oq3Cd/2KT23cDVN+//qdycKFFYfiyhoKWP9dpfGpuLm 9G/q6XD6b1iPJxzKOuFZUgd8FV7+vpgdkSPF74H2KjlO5ozHuxikfLK/vxrlREb48zki k+NwJapqpEHCGrDxbpOfgPcnBMfdROPNXLUPdDp/mTC0Gz7dPeQMXFTT9kEuN3fOsZjZ Ahc8y7pt8j/hFcnFu/2GDMq4DxQW89XfvPCp90bEYdGyGERHuvmnOY/wqTK51Xni8jBp ieJQ== X-Received: by 10.49.40.167 with SMTP id y7mr64240qek.36.1371651979738; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:26:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.94.20 with SMTP id cy20ls297607qeb.11.gmail; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:26:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.4.104 with SMTP id j8mr59027qej.40.1371651979287; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:26:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:26:18 -0700 (PDT) From: la arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <50799cc6-dd21-4c1b-9dfb-f4ce0928d0f3@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <97A72722-A86B-4774-B5A2-187F9129388B@yahoo.com> References: <8561d566-8f8b-4b46-9e7b-5fdbc1367b33@googlegroups.com> <1371405876.998.YahooMailNeo@web184401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <5a62e3e4-6bad-47c1-b6ad-86639420b7aa@googlegroups.com> <34087CDB-5C29-47F5-9257-D02B91A2502F@yahoo.com> <5958d62e-ea83-400a-8936-1f57aa1580b4@googlegroups.com> <97A72722-A86B-4774-B5A2-187F9129388B@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] "we" and masses. A bug in the CLL? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_329_5240509.1371651978832" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_329_5240509.1371651978832 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 5:57:00 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote: > > But it misses (not commenting on whether would ever really want to do > this). "we" is clearly plural but says nothing about how the members of > that plurality are related to this nu cusku, beyond the fact that one > member (already in {mi}) is uttering the instant token. In particular, > they may all be saying this or only the one who is uttering it, and some > may be among its target audience and some not. > Do you mean that "we" can also assume that {le cusku be dei} can include more than one individual ("We are the Borg") and no individuals outside this dialog? > Sent from my iPad > > On Jun 18, 2013, at 23:58, la arxokuna > > wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 11:19:05 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote: >> >> gleki, I think you're too vlafi'i happy, for one thing, and nothing said >> in this entire thread has changed my mind about this all being a non-issue. >> > > The issue comes only when trying to precisely translate some sentences > into lojban retaining the same level of vagueness. > > >> >> -- >> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >> >> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com . > To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com > . > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_329_5240509.1371651978832 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 5:57:00 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote:
But it= misses (not commenting on whether would ever really want to do this). &nbs= p;"we" is clearly plural but says nothing about how the members of that plu= rality are related to this nu cusku, beyond the fact that one member (alrea= dy in {mi}) is uttering the instant token.  In particular, they may al= l be saying this or only the one who is uttering it, and some may be among = its target audience and some not.

Do you mean that "we" can also assume that {le cusku be dei} can inc= lude more than one individual ("We are the Borg") and no individuals outsid= e this dialog?


Sent from my iPad

On = Jun 18, 2013, at 23:58, la arxokuna <gleki.is...@gmail.com>= wrote:



On T= uesday, June 18, 2013 11:19:05 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
gleki, I think you're too vlafi'i happy, for one thing, = and nothing said in this entire thread has changed my mind about this all b= eing a non-issue.

The iss= ue comes only when trying to precisely translate some sentences into lojban= retaining the same level of vagueness.
 

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai k= o cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_329_5240509.1371651978832--