Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: la arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <e2a28fa0-bf08-4230-84b0-74bb9920bef1@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <5A6C07CB-C2CA-4A7A-9B4B-D5DAACA61069@yahoo.com>
References: <8561d566-8f8b-4b46-9e7b-5fdbc1367b33@googlegroups.com> <CALMa68r4BqLh=eFcGPV1mA-fDkYpg3xR6d-Nu4RD8qVrueM4Gw@mail.gmail.com> <1371405876.998.YahooMailNeo@web184401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <5a62e3e4-6bad-47c1-b6ad-86639420b7aa@googlegroups.com> <CAOQ8VDVPXUDj7ffnMw=M1BEM5x_5MYOON0w4BrbDcnn4RmkOUA@mail.gmail.com> <c915e810-abae-4fe5-a0ac-1c2cba4394df@googlegroups.com> <34087CDB-5C29-47F5-9257-D02B91A2502F@yahoo.com> <d673c6cb-0236-4f40-88dd-615c1cdc945b@googlegroups.com> <CAMKwHj2HiBeTyQoNhEEmEmm__aqBhA4bUG8tHUn=qyb4MxEx6A@mail.gmail.com> <5958d62e-ea83-400a-8936-1f57aa1580b4@googlegroups.com> <97A72722-A86B-4774-B5A2-187F9129388B@yahoo.com> <50799cc6-dd21-4c1b-9dfb-f4ce0928d0f3@googlegroups.com> <D999C6A4-F052-47B3-A84B-FDE862722C1A@yahoo.com> <156ead61-3e49-444f-ba1a-c808839fd50d@googlegroups.com> <7E4B1F87-0D2C-4973-9A23-E03427E46515@yahoo.com>
 <5A6C07CB-C2CA-4A7A-9B4B-D5DAACA61069@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] "we" and masses. A bug in the CLL?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_5018_27057797.1371707242065"
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

------=_Part_5018_27057797.1371707242065
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1


On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 10:19:41 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote:
>
> Oops!  I probably should have said {na'i} (false dichotomy) since "we" is 
> actually neither.  It is, however, contextual, "the salient group of the 
> speaker and associate(s)", exactly {lo za'u cusku}, I I think.
>


Do you think you can give a precise definition of {zo'oi we} in Lojban?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


------=_Part_5018_27057797.1371707242065
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br>On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 10:19:41 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote:<bloc=
kquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-l=
eft: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;"><div bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF"><div>Oops!=
 &nbsp;I probably should have said {na'i} (false dichotomy) since "we" is a=
ctually neither. &nbsp;It is, however, contextual, "the salient group of th=
e speaker and associate(s)", exactly {lo za'u cusku}, I I think.<br></div><=
/div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Do you think you can g=
ive a precise definition of {zo'oi we} in Lojban?</div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out=
">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />

------=_Part_5018_27057797.1371707242065--