Received: from mail-oa0-f62.google.com ([209.85.219.62]:50725) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Uph9r-0006Xp-P1 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:52:41 -0700 Received: by mail-oa0-f62.google.com with SMTP id m1sf2229384oag.27 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:52:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:x-yahoo-newman-id:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-ymail-osg :x-yahoo-smtp:x-rocket-received:subject:references:from:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:mime-version:x-mailer:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aGjMHHX6XiF5jTLAKkgtohcctu4L57n11yRbvEjjDRM=; b=y1bFW51YtoTbQ/XbSPJLT4+iyrrWVBv+jRJ+7oR07xpcIZJ5hKcDBHRwKRcyfwx9zo FdFh50WQLRmxp2NwgUyisRoVNJiazWxf+gT+5KG7jCBUIDESi6JV9q9aWnEzrxzaWlyN jddI1Byxq3E7FLpvLy3Zx4d8OY5qVgMnB+mzlEWmPm53Dzoe1V4Nm/xNXpaiEl0Oo7Cz KpQWOESHfhUFZKa3xs/JWU9AIJdjx57pxG61rkGhKujOosBKJyA8Tpuz/8otqHlEcv7j SXlWSOv9uJQMjW9joVusrT8ujcO+JXNpOXyK4LvpGvI5eiJPV1u2JGEN6qV3cGYAPXEU MmrA== X-Received: by 10.50.114.138 with SMTP id jg10mr3631igb.16.1371743536528; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:52:16 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.93.104 with SMTP id ct8ls432743igb.18.gmail; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:52:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.69.2.67 with SMTP id bm3mr1061820pbd.3.1371743534865; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm47-vm4.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm47-vm4.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com. [67.195.87.182]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bu9si225199pac.0.2013.06.20.08.52.14 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 67.195.87.182 as permitted sender) client-ip=67.195.87.182; Received: from [98.137.12.55] by nm47.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Jun 2013 15:52:14 -0000 Received: from [208.71.42.207] by tm15.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Jun 2013 15:52:14 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp218.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Jun 2013 15:52:14 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 473429.36745.bm@smtp218.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: ztxqLrUVM1lTnRpODPfPyqrjCuQTrcME30KPcliwz3IKs9K J3wgZb6mAsGOrbZ7YfiGrfYAnFqnYG6RwalUESM2l0laZLXljNvHQRvRk.z3 E1_mHGB0p7d_Ku2TavhRNxUqtj4zhEDo8fdwGOq9vU9sJ5SNwB.8sd80Ynw4 Chc6wxT7eDCKbfNWmrUnRzSd3Ge66xgOUn.e0Ry_lbytkWhH03soSODurIgA PujlQ6KFS.vmB2NcuICBln0Oe2ini8NA.846vQal4QHEl4OVlOUFtCGovUSU vu9sXFxbAC_G7gZbmdyMv68UnVWaA1oB_FiuB7SZoObIClWQoTWnluJ.Cfw7 mMZ48qrU0cywVOvq5wJ15RS_Z0936OwXnJzDM4E7X7woAA0bD1vb4WYA8QSb 9t9Ro1aSzKPjM_RLONMdQWqm7ml2WlTfioeoVbAuZBkkqVe3MkeY9aUGCClL .M3Dxe._HUBBaNXrZ14ByhQBkfWAQh_99a9vl.Vs2VrT5srhmi.9agtN225q qQc0RndhGzUuQOSHCwbM.1vSeQLkdUU_wTJ_NAm2L6BUAgsdy3FMCJDLmyhx S5dUW9Uf0yJVoSyy_iIC86uDGWAo5BGxnVE2aBvmH2PRTBZfLilnbzc52UDa gx3snZ9UDTkNV.y7MnthdZaI_o0KwDovroJjFx4fpsXjUsWQyoh78kzVAq4w Qr1zeaGtgddujgH5UpDWbynau84stwkDdol6aO6qaH71FQF_kV3vNDSsCNa3 tB4aNYocQykpZwJT0_l6SsxsvD47LEYfl5uKL6zWmE4XSmX.4bjv6I248HQ- - X-Yahoo-SMTP: xvGyF4GswBCIFKGaxf5wSjlg3RF108g- X-Rocket-Received: from [10.0.1.4] (kali9putra@99.92.108.194 with ) by smtp218.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Jun 2013 15:52:14 +0000 UTC Subject: Re: [lojban] "we" and masses. A bug in the CLL? References: <8561d566-8f8b-4b46-9e7b-5fdbc1367b33@googlegroups.com> <1371405876.998.YahooMailNeo@web184401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <5a62e3e4-6bad-47c1-b6ad-86639420b7aa@googlegroups.com> <34087CDB-5C29-47F5-9257-D02B91A2502F@yahoo.com> <5958d62e-ea83-400a-8936-1f57aa1580b4@googlegroups.com> <97A72722-A86B-4774-B5A2-187F9129388B@yahoo.com> <50799cc6-dd21-4c1b-9dfb-f4ce0928d0f3@googlegroups.com> <156ead61-3e49-444f-ba1a-c808839fd50d@googlegroups.com> <7E4B1F87-0D2C-4973-9A23-E03427E46515@yahoo.com> <5A6C07CB-C2CA-4A7A-9B4B-D5DAACA61069@yahoo.com> <42d6ef31-3311-4181-b1a9-468271e86ac4@googlegroups.com> <579FEEE0-567D-4896-8391-C68E99ADEFCC@yahoo.com> <042628dd-5308-4d8e-b09c-400c03d5a3f9@googlegroups.com> <08B4257D-2310-4955-B5D4-E8E1FD5D6A35@yahoo.com> <40015169-9cff-401d-bac3-24330b920b6c@googlegroups.com> From: "John E. Clifford" In-Reply-To: <40015169-9cff-401d-bac3-24330b920b6c@googlegroups.com> Message-Id: Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:56:57 -0500 To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206) X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 67.195.87.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-40054CB7-0F38-4607-BEE0-3B59F52798B1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.0 X-Spam_score_int: 10 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I am assuming that person for Lojban is defined around {cusku}. People not involved in the current utterance, either as intended source or intended audience, are third person, by definition, again. A person doesn't have to be present to fill a first or second person role, doesn't even have to be alive, apparently. [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: googlegroups.com] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (kali9putra[at]yahoo.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 'From' yahoo.com does not match 'Received' headers 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature --Apple-Mail-40054CB7-0F38-4607-BEE0-3B59F52798B1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I am assuming that person for Lojban is defined around {cusku}. People not= involved in the current utterance, either as intended source or intended a= udience, are third person, by definition, again. A person doesn't have to = be present to fill a first or second person role, doesn't even have to be a= live, apparently. Sent from my iPad On Jun 20, 2013, at 8:47, la arxokuna wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Thursday, June 20, 2013 5:08:37 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote: > An English uncertainty about just who cusku? We know the utterer is in; w= ho else depends on context. But, since this is a first person pronoun, tho= se others cusku this as well (definitional). >=20 > How can they cusku if they are not in this dialog? English "we" covers {= mi jo'u mibdrata}. >=20 >=20 > Sent from my iPad >=20 > On Jun 20, 2013, at 7:48, la arxokuna wrote: >=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On Thursday, June 20, 2013 4:39:08 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote: >> So, {lo za'u cusku be dei }. {no'u} just sounds wrong;it is not an iden= tity, merely a predication, probably {poi}. For the rest it is over specif= ication in that these other things may or may not be included. {lo} does i= t's usual selection job in context. In particular, lo na'e cusku are not t= o be included, by the nature of the gadri.=20 >>=20 >> Don't you think that your definition contradicts Wiktionary that says th= at "we=3Dthe speaker and at least one other person" ? It is not said that t= hat other persons are to be viewed as speakers. >>=20 >>=20 >> Sent from my iPad >>=20 >> On Jun 20, 2013, at 6:31, la arxokuna wrote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Thursday, June 20, 2013 3:16:50 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote: >>> I thought I just did.=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Where is {dei} in {lo za'u cusku}. Does "we" include only those who sp= eak or those to whom something is spoken? No. >>>=20 >>> "we" is either {mi no'u za'umei} or {mi jo'u da poi prenu gi'e na'e cus= ku be dei gi'e na'e te cusku be dei} >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Sent from my iPad >>>=20 >>> On Jun 20, 2013, at 0:47, la arxokuna wrote: >>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 10:19:41 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote: >>>> Oops! I probably should have said {na'i} (false dichotomy) since "we"= is actually neither. It is, however, contextual, "the salient group of th= e speaker and associate(s)", exactly {lo za'u cusku}, I I think. >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Do you think you can give a precise definition of {zo'oi we} in Lojban= ? >>>> --=20 >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro= ups "lojban" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send= an email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>> To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com. >>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>> =20 >>>> =20 >>>=20 >>> --=20 >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou= ps "lojban" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send = an email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com. >>> To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> =20 >>> =20 >>=20 >> --=20 >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group= s "lojban" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send a= n email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> =20 >> =20 >=20 > --=20 > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an= email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > =20 > =20 --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --Apple-Mail-40054CB7-0F38-4607-BEE0-3B59F52798B1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
I am assuming that person= for Lojban is defined around {cusku}.  People not involved in the cur= rent utterance, either as intended source or intended audience, are third p= erson, by definition, again.  A person doesn't have to be present to f= ill a first or second person role, doesn't even have to be alive, apparentl= y.


Sent from my iPad

On Jun 20, 2013, at 8:= 47, la arxokuna <gleki.is.= my.name@gmail.com> wrote:



On Thursday, June 20, 2013 5:08:37 PM UTC+4, cliffor= d wrote:
An English uncertainty about just who cusku? We know the utterer is= in; who else depends on context.  But, since this is a first person p= ronoun, those others cusku this as well (definitional).

How can they cusku if they are not  in th= is dialog? English "we" covers {mi jo'u mibdrata}.


= Sent from my iPad

On Jun 20, 2013, at 7:48, la arxokuna <<= a href=3D"javascript:" target=3D"_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto=3D"p-JIHD9E2= ecJ">gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:



On Thursday, June 20, 2013 4:39:08 PM UTC+4, = clifford wrote:
So, {lo za'u cusku be dei }.  {no'u} just sounds wrong;it is= not an identity, merely a predication, probably {poi}.  For the rest = it is over specification in that these other things may or may not be inclu= ded.  {lo} does it's usual selection job in context.  In particul= ar, lo na'e cusku are not to be included, by the nature of the gadri.=  

Don't you think t= hat your definition contradicts Wiktionary that says that "we=3Dthe speaker= and at least one other person" ? It is not said that that other persons ar= e to be viewed as speakers.


Sent from my iPad
=
On Jun 20, 2013, at 6:31, la arxokuna <gleki.is...@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:



O= n Thursday, June 20, 2013 3:16:50 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote:
I thought I just did.=  


Where= is {dei}  in {lo za'u cusku}. Does "we" include only those who speak = or those to whom something is spoken? No.

"we" is = either {mi no'u za'umei} or {mi jo'u da poi prenu gi'e na'e cusku be dei gi= 'e na'e te cusku be dei}


Sent from my iPad
On Jun 20, 2013, at 0:47, la arxokuna <gleki.is...@gmail.com>= wrote:



On W= ednesday, June 19, 2013 10:19:41 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote:
Oops!  I probably= should have said {na'i} (false dichotomy) since "we" is actually neither. =  It is, however, contextual, "the salient group of the speaker and ass= ociate(s)", exactly {lo za'u cusku}, I I think.


Do you think you can give a precise def= inition of {zo'oi we} in Lojban?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--Apple-Mail-40054CB7-0F38-4607-BEE0-3B59F52798B1--