Received: from mail-pa0-f63.google.com ([209.85.220.63]:42974) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UphFj-0006aM-9d for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:58:32 -0700 Received: by mail-pa0-f63.google.com with SMTP id hz11sf2202286pad.28 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:58:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=KhA1Lub5NgLkkGnDELbPTDS6q1L0eDZdg+OLQsMZNMk=; b=XMx+kYD4lcu5eKOUxV6NRIJUeH3yQPYFYsnw43hi4fWqn3fCi89ky0S32EezA6vhPh 5OuFj5bhs3FPXsmF5gzBTRNEn0BPDULS9Owp4yKOBokG7bb33a630n0YYZ09A+FiAW1Y eqHM9mP3bU6Si52KbQg37ZAPmENPtQ4pYehJX7Sd3vRdC1c3UzKerdL8oZ88SL097vwY QPR5WYfQBc27vQzr755dBKE/g9uLowGHK6lEhngILaOOfALrW0eYSr4qBUN92Tgh/0yP doWaCdT0YebWKoSfcKPSh3m3adMRdWCDvzJw6zM4xPwafBiWd5hHwg3YFBi5AZXjip70 0VLQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=KhA1Lub5NgLkkGnDELbPTDS6q1L0eDZdg+OLQsMZNMk=; b=q9IY8Pyij2GwRePXpxjjWo9kQH04UzU/At0553g3MkaEZMes4RPEeE0+F05JEBc4ub Dp9ZwKySlNz6z6/IkEjV1I9g6bvXsu5bmrw7RTj93yTtUVmI2dfGT6S5TgpQtSUGDkvW v6hXjSuAXQPZdE7VRLfgENonmtJEgG/R/qJzrp3TlfiOQjrK1QqaqOu8MZeLM5HG6H2g dfyu5e6e3bS1DqHcHFql9z5Aphbz+61By/iFxiZEzCAmJRQYvf7brCkH1NTIPKVpgbqV 9qxuZmyRyqx85HB8wZs8hI0XTT809FMq5oesaUGPS2p5daeAgslP3aShI239rJDHWNsJ Iw5w== X-Received: by 10.50.73.69 with SMTP id j5mr5620igv.14.1371743900456; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:58:20 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.3.74 with SMTP id a10ls422987iga.28.canary; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:58:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.42.161.71 with SMTP id s7mr5794279icx.18.1371743900055; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oa0-x229.google.com (mail-oa0-x229.google.com [2607:f8b0:4003:c02::229]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i6si986933igv.2.2013.06.20.08.58.19 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c02::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4003:c02::229; Received: by mail-oa0-x229.google.com with SMTP id n10so8274073oag.0 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:58:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.158.36 with SMTP id wr4mr1816090obb.60.1371743899917; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:58:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.87.8 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:58:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3729f7bd-3aa6-499c-9a20-4b3d040d3ad8@googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:58:19 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] A bug in the CLL 7.6 example 6.14). From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c02::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013cbf04e0a84804df9803a9 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --089e013cbf04e0a84804df9803a9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I believe in in none of those cases does nei or no'a "work". I don't consider that sei-se'u constructions can "see" the sentence they are talking about it. It would make about as much sense as: lo mamta cusku lu vo'a nitcu lo nu klama lo zarci li'u and claiming that "vo'a" refers to "lo mamta" (contrariwise, "lo mamta cusku lo se du'u vo'a nitcu lo nu klama lo zarci" does work) --gejyspa On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:15 AM, guskant wrote: > I have a question. Is a {sei} bridi in a bridi called an embedded bridi? > For example, > > 1) ko'a ko'e sei nei brode se'u broda > 2) ko'a ko'e sei no'a brode se'u broda > In which sentence is {broda} repeated, or neither? > > On the other hand, I think a {to} sentence in a bridi is neither an > embedded sentence nor a part of the bridi in this context. For example, > 3) ko'a ko'e to nei brode toi broda > 4) ko'a ko'e to no'a brode toi broda > in neither 3) nor 4), {broda} is repeated; or am I wrong? > > A {sei} bridi is grammatically a free modifier just like a {to} sentence, > but semantically a metalinguistic bridi, which is somehow similar in > meaning to {BAI lonu} bridi, which is clearly an embedded bridi, in which > {no'a} works. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --089e013cbf04e0a84804df9803a9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=A0 I believe in in none of those cases does nei or no'= ;a "work". =A0I don't consider that sei-se'u construction= s can "see" the sentence they are talking about it. =A0It would m= ake about as much sense as:
lo mamta cusku lu vo'a nitcu lo nu klama lo zarci li'u=A0
and claiming that "vo'a" refers to "lo mamta"= ; (contrariwise, "lo mamta cusku lo se du'u =A0vo'a nitcu lo n= u klama lo zarci" does work)
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 --gejyspa

=


On Tue,= Jun 18, 2013 at 2:15 AM, guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com> wrote:
I have a question. Is a {sei} bridi in = a bridi called an embedded bridi? For example,

1) = ko'a ko'e sei nei brode se'u broda
2) ko'a ko'e sei no'a brode se'u broda
In wh= ich sentence is {broda} repeated, or neither?=A0

O= n the other hand, I think a {to} sentence in a bridi is neither an embedded= sentence nor a part of the bridi in this context. For example,
3) ko'a ko'e to nei brode toi broda
4) ko'a ko&#= 39;e to no'a brode toi broda
in neither 3) nor 4), {broda} is= repeated; or am I wrong?

A {sei} bridi is grammat= ically a free modifier just like a {to} sentence, but semantically a metali= nguistic bridi, which is somehow similar in meaning to {BAI lonu} bridi, wh= ich is clearly an embedded bridi, in which {no'a} works.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
=A0
=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--089e013cbf04e0a84804df9803a9--