Received: from mail-ob0-f184.google.com ([209.85.214.184]:48231) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UplW9-0008MQ-ML for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:31:46 -0700 Received: by mail-ob0-f184.google.com with SMTP id wc20sf2243585obb.11 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:31:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=uME3rvG3IHBKejRdz+X3NfwO+mN0H4fURLHBAtKr/xw=; b=KdGgYqkqVgQf+9ETqeIDc1H+6YVeKjDc2VG5785jr97h+9HDzSXZHWr7rEV/DJSrLd CVXmJOV85RFC0CUOiAIhDqEmXMijp3BtSpSn5BG29Ti28Bud3BVGMX4z9b1t4uuTeDOo oksAoFwesIfdyMuXbNHveQnRV/xveKMk6AxJa8nk10RFoC3hlrZYaNaoWMIe/id8aU6U C6chCJhvkQYRhn5Z3idJaDlw8xa82ig140ewBl+1gS1a6ZMWdp7eExgkILdpebrq9zk+ F2e8Ez9TDczag8zTsHeOBPtVMrqoP/OcCjVXvE8fGVSiheOZTNYJIlnbutc33e5aGWwd 8kqQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=uME3rvG3IHBKejRdz+X3NfwO+mN0H4fURLHBAtKr/xw=; b=NOB2ip5xqCwDhZk85eZmSRQrXwx9Hkfz+Btn7gt/Fn2qlxzcdcKWrlBlXEYeMJ+vhD eXQCj2CueMBwy5k+nd/WbVy3bDBFnfes3mdlbQjH+H7DjWAh2dnLQwqnDJi8Fmgb5ARv vzDKn0KXkUeF1WgtGuAqewbfxAj9lkHWmXz94dO/KaSCIfO5WJDVqh+jsYLQi8yGGBnZ ldkTPj37tZBhaVNmuCZ36cjrLXMh8cONO9S3uDxq6u6+r/hTGdj1czD5aHs+RGUjFLum IKCwA2BO5IucAUCGh0A81gIXfSmWjl0TJxWPyBBCFdjAOCW1DkiDvGSQeph2Pgy+zkEY 7iPw== X-Received: by 10.50.13.105 with SMTP id g9mr64622igc.9.1371760294281; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:31:34 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.153.14 with SMTP id vc14ls543716igb.34.gmail; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:31:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.112.201 with SMTP id is9mr1230327igb.3.1371760293159; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-x230.google.com (mail-ob0-x230.google.com [2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b5si120817igx.3.2013.06.20.13.31.33 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230; Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id v19so7539872obq.7 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:31:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.165.232 with SMTP id zb8mr2327314obb.101.1371760292836; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:31:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.87.8 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:31:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <3729f7bd-3aa6-499c-9a20-4b3d040d3ad8@googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 16:31:32 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] A bug in the CLL 7.6 example 6.14). From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2ea2cf8bccf04df9bd4d4 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --001a11c2ea2cf8bccf04df9bd4d4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (pardon me for losing the cu/ku in my example, btw) I stand corrected. --gejyspa On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Jacob Errington wrote= : > On 20 June 2013 11:58, Michael Turniansky wrote: > >> I believe in in none of those cases does nei or no'a "work". I don't >> consider that sei-se'u constructions can "see" the sentence they are >> talking about it. It would make about as much sense as: >> lo mamta cusku lu vo'a nitcu lo nu klama lo zarci li'u >> and claiming that "vo'a" refers to "lo mamta" (contrariwise, "lo mamta >> cusku lo se du'u vo'a nitcu lo nu klama lo zarci" does work) >> --gejyspa >> >> >> > CLL 19:12 contradicts you on this point: > > Since a discursive utterance is working at a =93higher=94 level of abstra= ction > than a non-discursive utterance, a non-discursive utterance cannot refer = to > a discursive utterance. Specifically, the various back-counting, > reciprocal, and reflexive constructs in selma'o KOhA ignore the utterance= s > at =93higher=94 metalinguistic levels in determining their referent. It i= s > possible, and sometimes necessary, to refer to lower metalinguistic level= s. > For example, the English =93he said=94 in a conversation is metalinguisti= c. For > this purpose, quotations are considered to be at a lower metalinguistic > level than the surrounding context (a quoted text cannot refer to the > statements of the one who quotes it), whereas parenthetical remarks are > considered to be at a higher level than the context. > > Thus, it is possible from within a "higher" context to refer to the > contents of a "lower" context. This is why it is possible to refer to the > contents of a lu-quote, but not for its contents to refer to the bridi in > which that lu-quote is a sumti. Likewise, a sei-clause can use ri and oth= er > anaphoric devices to refer to what is outside it, because what is outside > it is on a "lower" level. > > Metalinguistic "height" according to CLL: > SEI..SEhU, TO..TOI > ordinary bridi > lu-quotes > > That being said, I say that {nei} used in a sei-clause refers to the brid= i > of the sei-clause. This is consistent with (almost) every other use of ne= i. > To refer to the bridi outside the sei-clause {no'a} is required. > > .i mi'e la tsnai mu'o > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --001a11c2ea2cf8bccf04df9bd4d4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
(pardon me for losing the cu/ku in my example, btw)
I stand corrected.
=A0 --gejyspa



On = Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com>= wrote:
On 20 Jun= e 2013 11:58, Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>= wrote:
=A0 I believe in in none of those cases d= oes nei or no'a "work". =A0I don't consider that sei-se&#= 39;u constructions can "see" the sentence they are talking about = it. =A0It would make about as much sense as:
lo mamta cusku lu vo'a nitcu lo nu klama lo zarci li'u=A0
and claiming that "vo'a" refers to "lo mamta" (con= trariwise, "lo mamta cusku lo se du'u =A0vo'a nitcu lo nu klam= a lo zarci" does work)
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 --gejyspa

<= div>


=
CLL 19:12 contradicts you on this point:

Since a discursive utterance is working at a =93higher=94 level of= abstraction than a non-discursive utterance, a non-discursive utterance ca= nnot refer to a discursive utterance. Specifically, the various back-counti= ng, reciprocal, and reflexive constructs in selma'o KOhA ignore the utt= erances at =93higher=94 metalinguistic levels in determining their referent= . It is possible, and sometimes necessary, to refer to lower metalinguistic= levels. For example, the English =93he said=94 in a conversation is metali= nguistic. For this purpose, quotations are considered to be at a lower meta= linguistic level than the surrounding context (a quoted text cannot refer t= o the statements of the one who quotes it), whereas parenthetical remarks a= re considered to be at a higher level than the context.

Thus, it is possible from within a "higher" c= ontext to refer to the contents of a "lower" context. This is why= it is possible to refer to the contents of a lu-quote, but not for its con= tents to refer to the bridi in which that lu-quote is a sumti. Likewise, a = sei-clause can use ri and other anaphoric devices to refer to what is outsi= de it, because what is outside it is on a "lower" level.

Metalinguistic "height" according to CLL:
= SEI..SEhU, TO..TOI > ordinary bridi > lu-quotes

<= div>That being said, I say that {nei} used in a sei-clause refers to the br= idi of the sei-clause. This is consistent with (almost) every other use of = nei. To refer to the bridi outside the sei-clause {no'a} is required.

.i mi'e la tsnai mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
=A0
=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
--001a11c2ea2cf8bccf04df9bd4d4--