Received: from mail-ie0-f185.google.com ([209.85.223.185]:35509) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Uql5u-0004MK-UK for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:16:54 -0700 Received: by mail-ie0-f185.google.com with SMTP id s9sf3280544iec.2 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:16:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:x-yahoo-newman-id:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-ymail-osg :x-yahoo-smtp:x-rocket-received:subject:references:from:x-mailer :in-reply-to:message-id:date:to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=wE+o+ILeWLcF7C01AqJtCcof8TkDCg1l0y75VLPef8k=; b=Q3AlnO1z5JxgCwm1Uw40rktQhTPD1Oa+Cgsfl+cxeZe27he00QlVCdOOpRoqF/sUFZ wbc+Gv+Bx2PUj8L+isWdWYehrlW5MGqsYuLEGJIs50goYWujqbc2G00wNDXesDk9VfSt 8aH7/XWhgPNnAmOk3eLOTHSmG9A9JP7e/5WnggLfsP+eWV/uI3PlkV/oqeyNP1xyRqaS rVIYw2r7GcwJc+8BQKDoaQ+JzYxi9JVrie9VVmutz+loY5tz3ayXBvPczeqbG1Wh4aIa 5n0pPXWckVLr9pGizKwBONl/wjXaA2uwiSDcU/WIEL71AvxMYqY19jPNO7pDBGv8S9+e V1wQ== X-Received: by 10.50.98.1 with SMTP id ee1mr329359igb.5.1371996995307; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:16:35 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.11.82 with SMTP id o18ls1647841igb.14.canary; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:16:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.7.199 with SMTP id l7mr3480266paa.9.1371996994586; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm11-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm11-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com. [98.139.213.152]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cw1si2052667pbb.0.2013.06.23.07.16.34 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.213.152 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.139.213.152; Received: from [98.139.212.146] by nm11.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jun 2013 14:16:33 -0000 Received: from [98.139.211.162] by tm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jun 2013 14:16:33 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp219.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jun 2013 14:16:33 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 482283.48590.bm@smtp219.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: yU8CAGIVM1k3yzfiubCFJPOGzVV8fgx4Jtims_Q.VVy5gqi weHsK3WSa8jlItD5jalrWi65dUhM._u0Hx6zkEgZObVFioO4otAFZBJYq3tE smxccB02mg0txCpO6YXeW1CSMnE0TtaXFf0Nijz0L5V6qefwzXDp3RQL6iXo d9pOfEkst2J6AWDPguPh8rxQl4fMCKy1hMjBkSQgfUcem54l8owdHJwY5jto Pd7mvURLowRfxDOmF6U7qty0dnapwKtZjSWwi6EijwM4zX8ygz3iCg9QE0r. 16HIYLbA.FZmcfui1c95Cs.w1r.8kZrRLoYgdaGxJ3RL1wBGBwXLv0a8Njt8 SYEi7pjRLqJLOEvkO8y_PIbtFCCuLJDyMTDIyGDvi1pIujPcjlVcr6ino2au WZmPWbZaQcEncReDSswD8_G4RXGCTwlCq0Rctv4vPIa61pBlO8NpKJeMciCy NMTtfSwd.JnNG6Ytv.x_hMAd3aqU5f_UL_LLUor3..L4SeeoY0EE6DaTWOum DJ4rclglyZLk7hVdFQduGX.KmvmemoD6Kj_sj2Vx3SR4EaoJxXv96kaFgEpR L4IpFw_WA4919sMzo9x.M4TZEmpBiaYOl22f71lK4cYDv23IoEXkcu8ifWs7 Z_WGkGkBXlaHmzMko5shyScsi1ngxYffYigMe4LiNfyuvQAAqkR6dWwHf0w- - X-Yahoo-SMTP: xvGyF4GswBCIFKGaxf5wSjlg3RF108g- X-Rocket-Received: from [10.0.1.4] (kali9putra@99.92.108.194 with ) by smtp219.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Jun 2013 07:16:33 -0700 PDT Subject: Re: [lojban] Please, the best explanation of {le} vs. {lo} References: <51C5B15F.8070903@gmx.de> <1371920751.98036.YahooMailNeo@web184404.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <18545397.qYQ50d5c6S@caracal> <9C825D21-FED6-4D58-BA79-D8CFE1BAAA8A@yahoo.com> <51C6C19C.6080107@gmx.de> From: "John E. Clifford" X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206) In-Reply-To: <51C6C19C.6080107@gmx.de> Message-Id: <6FEDE6CB-D284-4E88-8344-5AB815B6FEA5@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 09:16:36 -0500 To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.213.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.0 X-Spam_score_int: 10 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Well, I'm not sure how obvious it is that {zo'e} picks up my hunger rather than an indefinite something (and, if it does, what that says about leaving places unfilled). I have no trouble with the various tenses being used as tags with arguments; I am less comfortable about tags being used as tenses without arguments, that is, as adverbs not in tanru form. [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (kali9putra[at]yahoo.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 'From' yahoo.com does not match 'Received' headers 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: gmx.de] 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Well, I'm not sure how obvious it is that {zo'e} picks up my hunger rather than an indefinite something (and, if it does, what that says about leaving places unfilled). I have no trouble with the various tenses being used as tags with arguments; I am less comfortable about tags being used as tenses without arguments, that is, as adverbs not in tanru form. Sent from my iPad On Jun 23, 2013, at 4:36, selpa'i wrote: > la .pycyn. cu cusku di'e >> Still uncomfortable about the construction, adding a place but not >> filling it > > But it's entirely normal to do that! I don't know why you distinguish > between tenses and BAI here. Both are tags, so both can either tag > something explicitly or not. Here is a natural example using a BAI as > selbri tag: > > mi xagji .i mi mu'i jukpa lo sanmi > "I'm hungry. I, motivated by it/that, cook a meal." > > {mu'i} implicitly tags {zo'e}, which in this context obviously refers to > my state of hunger. There is nothing weird about that. > > mu'o mi'e la selpa'i > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.