Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.138.91.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.138.91.19;
Subject: Re: [lojban] Please, the best explanation of {le} vs. {lo}
References: <e7d449eb-3494-4ffa-a469-3145135f6f96@googlegroups.com> <51C5B15F.8070903@gmx.de> <1371920751.98036.YahooMailNeo@web184404.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <18545397.qYQ50d5c6S@caracal> <51C6C531.6020106@gmx.de>
From: "John E. Clifford" <kali9putra@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <51C6C531.6020106@gmx.de>
Message-Id: <EAEAC118-1CF3-4F4D-A148-8297CE193AFA@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 09:20:19 -0500
To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" <lojban@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam_score: 1.0
X-Spam_score_int: 10
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  But {ca'o} is quite literal. I worry about {le}. Lojban does
    bring out fussbudgetry. Sent from my iPad On Jun 23, 2013, at 4:51, selpa'i
    <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote: [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.0 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: gmx.de]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (kali9putra[at]yahoo.com)
  0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED   No valid author signature, adsp_override is
                             CUSTOM_MED
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  1.0 FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD      'From' yahoo.com does not match 'Received' headers
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature

But {ca'o} is quite literal.  I worry about {le}.  Lojban does bring out fu=
ssbudgetry.

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 23, 2013, at 4:51, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:

> la .pier. cu cusku di'e
>> I think the correct preposition is "la'u", not "tai".
>=20
> I don't see how that would work. If anything, it would be {se la'u}.
>=20
>> "tai" is what I used in
>> ".i ca'o le nu casnu tai kei", for "pendant qu'ainsi l'on d=C3=A9lib=C4=
=8Dre".
>=20
> That's also a proper usage of {tai}, though here I don't like the {ca'o}.=
 :)
>=20
> mu'o mi'e la selpa'i
>=20
> --=20
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups=
 "lojban" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an=
 email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>=20
>=20

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.