Received: from mail-gh0-f186.google.com ([209.85.160.186]:59341) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Uqs9l-0006yY-Uf for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:49:33 -0700 Received: by mail-gh0-f186.google.com with SMTP id g18sf2813506ghb.23 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:49:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id:x-ymail-osg :x-rocket-mimeinfo:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:reply-to :subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=DG2vEcbA4wEcZla9KmaL1jbgzz9z18lMlBClg6OPwM8=; b=kweEqEDZ6l7EbSFL+w0ERhfndJ1eY4II0AtVWcbzi37RSw8OMuNCd6ERugapRRfNWj fr/RRXAIhyzB5xyzlopu4OYLGIBw28Je4TYKB8JoajCjY0aSNm7Cr967gR6/BhglVl3X sJ9/ofVf1rekOuoi/C7K5PgIs2F6Of8fHE69BbPyo4eFN+Ud4R/cJtB6JSFTV94nlD25 LRV+Pdq3qRSxJSBqNk5ACCr3HkcXjMoGU3S1eXXSB+MplEiyldtQ6buz6Z2t656UXeAz 2FtVJp4yqxphIUy0ULABdNcim3XerHNq06DyuFYNKYcUe8TkI06xJy73cBySnv5X2R0G pp7w== X-Received: by 10.49.94.174 with SMTP id dd14mr466249qeb.14.1372024143305; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:49:03 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.47.110 with SMTP id c14ls776923qen.71.gmail; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:49:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.224.174.145 with SMTP id t17mr23537374qaz.4.1372024142782; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm2-vm7.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm2-vm7.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com. [216.109.114.94]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s6si1840722qcy.0.2013.06.23.14.49.02 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 216.109.114.94 as permitted sender) client-ip=216.109.114.94; Received: from [66.196.81.159] by nm2.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jun 2013 21:49:02 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.193] by tm5.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jun 2013 21:49:01 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.96] by tm4.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jun 2013 21:49:01 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1001.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jun 2013 21:49:01 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 822881.22632.bm@omp1001.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 97489 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Jun 2013 21:49:01 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: uyd4JeYVM1nYsBoBivr6bfnn2rOCBZDxbHgr6wAltVxMFHw wT2nv7IDdnkhpKBpx1gItxDhInSOvZ50BuvWdZ8.lnKR6qsaXbvj97luoJWu .wqY4w6XgK9KygupOCKtiEMy0GRJeoNNss49ssriOZpTOJVNSQkC1Pi4ZbgO p8lU0KbQeZScRfW7EtFtKBooK.SRpkJ44LdFtQFic9KCrMf9p_FAodrs689w VT5Kd2jFJXfUkNyzGVbGtpsz8pHHvwwWdxZEij1XgC17pDw.0WmfXSobnrf. iXRo87dcCfv2EFwnAuRbspx8UzLKY2LYaGGOiiI_fXJ4KTc.7h3YSA3BiScG PFgce7LHLFo55pAn3MJNX.QsOVv4cAWGAo5Zb1ZHry3hr3f7S9f216IIT5Xz HfDF0z7YUqZlot5_kVy0a5kyOR_Uio93zXft38bY5ot8m1ZD0Az8_MMkJRr8 bG5zRGtX9o75DMQTOtotO7wdL2KIcEKV5vbVX2JNos.5QOMFr8KzkaZ4pwLM wf2T.etheKE9NgbrxPc3hUdqiv.DdGKYDZjqonNYzFtCOgSagk61MYnHEgen ZCzghuy2RHaLA_zjpkUghCZmYnreHjoaCtjDyRhDfIj4jdmoy7B0aAK918rt 8gzRIVT1fmHgdCBAq3bJnbzFl4MCAfEkBCErG_cn6KuI_3VKEa9SUn8LnG7O FK7qiR.klE1b_BozzYAlKFEZI71m5igfETDw0mYNuLMyfKEnB0vpG.68zHSm 2BLVa Received: from [99.92.108.194] by web184404.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:49:01 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,Q2xvc2UgZW5vdWdoIHRvIG1ha2UgdGhlIGN1cnJlbnQgcG9pbnQgKGJvdGggaGlzdG9yaWVzIGFyZSBtb3JlIHNwZWNrbGVkIHRoYW4gb25lIHdvdWxkIGxpa2UpLsKgIAoKCgoKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KIEZyb206IEpvbmF0aGFuIEpvbmVzIDxleWVvbnVzQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4KVG86IGxvamJhbkBnb29nbGVncm91cHMuY29tIApTZW50OiBTdW5kYXksIEp1bmUgMjMsIDIwMTMgNDowMiBQTQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogW2xvamJhbl0gUGxlYXNlLCB0aGUgYmVzdCBleHBsYW5hdGkBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.148.554 References: <5d7f238f-ff93-40ab-af24-fc6320d91b23@googlegroups.com> <199f9de9-f0bb-4cbb-bd8e-e124b45d5d1d@googlegroups.com> <20130623121840.GI32044@samsa.fritz.box> <2d346b25-b744-4f11-9fcb-65211de46c48@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <1372024141.49372.YahooMailNeo@web184404.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:49:01 -0700 (PDT) From: John E Clifford Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Please, the best explanation of {le} vs. {lo} To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 216.109.114.94 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-420974808-2100499701-1372024141=:49372" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ---420974808-2100499701-1372024141=:49372 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Close enough to make the current point (both histories are more speckled th= an one would like).=9A=20 ________________________________ From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com=20 Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2013 4:02 PM Subject: Re: [lojban] Please, the best explanation of {le} vs. {lo} =20 On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:41 AM, =E1=CE=C1=D4=CF=CC=C9=CA =E7=C1=DB=C5=D7 <= volishavas@gmail.com> wrote: Using here {le nanmu} is not better and actually it might be wrong. Cuz it = may be that I just now saw a woman, which I described as a man and I think = the person is a man. >He/she has not any specific meaning for me at all that is why I called him= /her {lo nanmu}, but not {le ninmu}. >Please, everybody, read xorlo-update already cuz the {lo}-meaning has chan= ged dramatically since CLL, which is dated by 1997. > Lookup the meaning of the word "veridical". {lo} is and /always has been/ v= eridical- it must and can only be used for things which /actually are/ what= you're describing them as. {le} is and /always has been/ non-veridical. xorlo did not change the meaning of {lo} or {le}, it just changed how quant= ification works. =9A =D7=CF=D3=CB=D2=C5=D3=C5=CE=D8=C5, 23 =C9=C0=CE=D1 2013=9A=C7., 18:18:40 UT= C+6 =D0=CF=CC=D8=DA=CF=D7=C1=D4=C5=CC=D8 v4hn =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC: >On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 03:21:50AM -0700, =E1=CE=C1=D4=CF=CC=C9=CA =E7=C1= =DB=C5=D7 wrote:=20 >>> I may call a woman with {lo nanmu} if I think the person is a man.=20 >>> You can ask about that almost anybody, especially la tsani or la selpa'= i.=20 >>> And they can say am I right or not.=20 >> >>Yes, you can do that. Obviously. How else would you describe someone=20 >>who seems to be a man?=20 >> >>Nevertheless, you say something ba'e wrong then.=20 >>Using {le nanmu} (which in my opinion is better style anyway when you=20 >>have someone specific in mind) you do not, because you refer to=20 >>a specific individual no matter the description.=20 >> >> >>v4hn=20 >> >--=20 >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups = "lojban" group. >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an = email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. >For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >=9A >=9A > --=20 mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ---420974808-2100499701-1372024141=:49372 Content-Type: text/html; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Close enough to make = the current point (both histories are more speckled than one would like).&n= bsp;

<= div dir=3D"ltr">
From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gm= ail.com>
To: lojban= @googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2013 4:02 PM
= Subject: Re: [lojban] Please, the best explanation of {le} vs. {= lo}

On Sun, J= un 23, 2013 at 6:41 AM, =E1=CE=C1=D4=CF=CC=C9=CA =E7=C1=DB=C5=D7 <volishavas@gmail.com> wrote:
Using here {le nanmu} is not better and actually it might be wrong. Cuz it = may be that I just now saw a woman, which I described as a man and I think = the person is a man.
He/she has not any specific meaning for me at all t= hat is why I called him/her {lo nanmu}, but not {le ninmu}.
Please, everybody, read xorlo-update already cuz the {lo}-meaning has chang= ed dramatically since CLL, which is dated by 1997.
Lookup the meaning of the word "veridical". {lo} is and /always has been/ = veridical- it must and can only be used for things which /actually are/ wha= t you're describing them as. {le} is and /always has been/ non-veridical.
xorlo did not change the meaning of {lo} or {le}, it just changed how q= uantification works.
 
=D7=CF=D3=CB=D2=C5=D3=C5=CE=D8=C5, 23 =C9=C0=CE=D1 2013 =C7., 18= :18:40 UTC+6 =D0=CF=CC=D8=DA=CF=D7=C1=D4=C5=CC=D8 v4hn =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1= =CC:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 03:21:50AM -0700, =E1=CE=C1=D4=CF=CC=C9= =CA =E7=C1=DB=C5=D7 wrote:
> I may call a woman with {lo nanmu} if I think the person is a man.
> You can ask about that almost anybody, especially la tsani or la s= elpa'i.=20
> And they can say am I right or not.

Yes, you can do that. Obviously. How else would you describe someone
who seems to be a man?

Nevertheless, you say something ba'e wrong then.
Using {le nanmu} (which in my opinion is better style anyway when you
have someone specific in mind) you do not, because you refer to
a specific individual no matter the description.


v4hn



--
mu'o mi'e .= aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu= do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_o= ut.
 
 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
---420974808-2100499701-1372024141=:49372--