Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMKwHj0iNVYJhjbcWpOJty2FsYPtW_rad-6DoZg2TreM1RBbnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e7d449eb-3494-4ffa-a469-3145135f6f96@googlegroups.com>
	<CALm==BWNQg8g6+nGS2Tr1o5LhYB=3PYFihar-jeb5gQhP4Hd=Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<5d7f238f-ff93-40ab-af24-fc6320d91b23@googlegroups.com>
	<CAMKwHj1rHGmv_ZA6q5N5_sLgOS+pTLDFEdXxhDHt3yZ8tJJu3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<c881bb54-556a-4507-8a69-5d9836d4590c@googlegroups.com>
	<CAMKwHj1yae-EHEi7txVG61nGtHwD_vP9br4R2RQ64+ZBOMtZ1w@mail.gmail.com>
	<199f9de9-f0bb-4cbb-bd8e-e124b45d5d1d@googlegroups.com>
	<CAMKwHj0YPQvyZKPT83NMYG_mmpNNy=j0HVdjeQm6P22jwrzNug@mail.gmail.com>
	<d8fa0d25-ba5a-4d6f-aad9-6f5733c05c7e@googlegroups.com>
	<20130623121840.GI32044@samsa.fritz.box>
	<2d346b25-b744-4f11-9fcb-65211de46c48@googlegroups.com>
	<CAMKwHj3hLX1mP-19-L2EExwt=ATx08KJUBWrA5Om+USOpdY6CA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+gZtgJvR6tRnigHk7YGBeHzm-WZEiW+YGLicOvnccLm-a_FCA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMKwHj0iNVYJhjbcWpOJty2FsYPtW_rad-6DoZg2TreM1RBbnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 08:43:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+gZtgJby9tLz0sos2FCXDt2dFnPRVrP4=bQUpGYFkdZWo5JBg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Please, the best explanation of {le} vs. {lo}
From: Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013a01c82cb02804dfe5c34a
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

--089e013a01c82cb02804dfe5c34a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:

> No it isn't. All unfilled places are always implicitly filled with zo'e,
> so rexorlo lo most certainly did have zo'e.

You misunderstand. {lo broda} = {*zo'e* noi ke'a broda}. Old-lo had a da
there instead of zo'e. This is a large change.

mi'e la latro'a mu'o

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--089e013a01c82cb02804dfe5c34a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Jonathan Jones <span dir=
=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:eyeonus@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">eyeonus=
@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote">
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">No it isn&#39;t. All unfilled places are alw=
ays implicitly filled with zo&#39;e, so rexorlo lo most certainly did have =
zo&#39;e.</blockquote>
<div style>You misunderstand. {lo broda} =3D {*zo&#39;e* noi ke&#39;a broda=
}. Old-lo had a da there instead of zo&#39;e. This is a large change.</div>=
<div style><br></div><div style>mi&#39;e la latro&#39;a mu&#39;o=A0</div></=
div>
<br></div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out=
">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />

--089e013a01c82cb02804dfe5c34a--