Received: from mail-ob0-f190.google.com ([209.85.214.190]:63565) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UwtCT-0004re-R2 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:09:06 -0700 Received: by mail-ob0-f190.google.com with SMTP id up14sf2120270obb.27 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:08:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:x-ct-class:x-ct-score:x-ct-refid:x-ct-spam :x-authority-analysis:x-cm-score:message-id:date:from:organization :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=vhuSVua/U8493P3iTXEqjWYx3lrPCKK740FhY6uq6QU=; b=Zxomdii3h+t4gg5TVDf2tuYVFQLqAFAVUAR1+eBFAyRzAbgjcSCy9Cvn9THwMkMW15 GlrALbxo9C4QqNRrCoqMAhZZoRPQ4MCOdE7zy6mXFs6n/kq24ryv0c0mXMQL5fkvT03c KNU6WE18ebXO/n8a2V4MKt3vfuc6NI1mR8Z7MygbfbYA4Xqy8vpoIUBpDVM1SoDuOaBp MJDU9djAXEq8B5tuChb0g/u5r5abcZBMCt0Fmd7jY8ffF0RtU+yF67sHVU5VPZbeinKu uEop/WW6ON8Jsybjg+/zhCda9O8bds83BT6uXIM2kT2xyS170H4TpLCHpidkZPI1b09G xrAA== X-Received: by 10.49.58.170 with SMTP id s10mr942552qeq.28.1373458123069; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:08:43 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.128.34 with SMTP id nl2ls2598789qeb.39.gmail; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:08:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.58.106.104 with SMTP id gt8mr3934204veb.16.1373458122541; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:08:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmfepo102.cox.net (eastrmfepo102.cox.net. [68.230.241.214]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id c28si104911qck.1.2013.07.10.05.08.42 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:08:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.214 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) client-ip=68.230.241.214; Received: from eastrmimpo305 ([68.230.241.237]) by eastrmfepo102.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.09 201-2260-151-124-20120717) with ESMTP id <20130710120842.YKLL3897.eastrmfepo102.cox.net@eastrmimpo305> for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:08:42 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([72.209.248.61]) by eastrmimpo305 with cox id yc8h1l00c1LDWBL01c8hg4; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:08:42 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020205.51DD4ECA.001D,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=c8x1t2Bl c=1 sm=1 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:17 a=YsUzL_8ObRgA:10 a=E_15SvVhB2wA:10 a=xmHE3fpoGJwA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=al5-5ry-nYsA:10 a=1WtJvAIdtHOr73vaHnAA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=dxBpO5_FDU0A:10 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <51DD4EC8.40602@lojban.org> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:08:40 -0400 From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Baby words: "more". References: <20130708172215.GA4227@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <20130709024026.GB4227@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <7734ddb0-7764-468c-9625-5661e6ff7dea@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.214 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Jacob Errington wrote: > How about {zenba}? > > .i xu do djica lo nu zenba lo ka (ba'o) pinxe lo ladru xokaumei > Obviously, that's way to long to be productive, but {.i .aupei ladru > pinxe zenba} ? > "Do you want to increase in the property of ." I think the problem with the formulations proposed in this thread is that they are all ambiguous, with the obvious context-free meaning probably not the one that we want. zenba, zmadu, jmina all seem likely for expressing that one might like a larger portion dished out onto the plate that still has the original portion. In context, when one wants "more peas", one has already eaten the peas that were on the plate, and thus the additional serving isn't really an increase, but a repetition of the serving, and hence krefu would be a better basis. So how about pei krefu tu'a loi [peas] lojbab -- Bob LeChevalier lojbab@lojban.org www.lojban.org President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.