Received: from mail-gg0-f192.google.com ([209.85.161.192]:35925) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UzgkM-0001Ac-QJ for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 22:27:42 -0700 Received: by mail-gg0-f192.google.com with SMTP id o2sf745270ggm.29 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 22:27:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=qUoYm9JLT1ZOcIuXV4vY9Z5CGFyaJwQ+rSwBFNr27sI=; b=Ul35rWEjDEe/EY8zvsUOxyLF4AGYVoFpXIFmXpBMFE1odSGPwZgNxGSZN5T/Yy6SMi SiFQu9kI4aQfIQy3Z8xR07hxsWM9P/clLo523GpKl05ezZDZKRaeY9nJITHw1vZQmbmA hJ2TCMA6MLYyUbSzEulXf0lLyXgVNa4EubWvn+LfrgRWncB6ljRYsRndsFDBogHycOkA +DGozDSD73ntdUTLwst1Fgg8/JgPhvhg/yOvcztx0MNzs39buOigzlX9KdYqfwDtAUAE 78cgq8aCADeK/REO3noEjFwz88HF1m5efUfMg68LeA6tOiBx64kaLSBnJGYsn5X9eaNl zywA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=qUoYm9JLT1ZOcIuXV4vY9Z5CGFyaJwQ+rSwBFNr27sI=; b=hLewGiWzUkhhki9RmSG54PgtJlYZo9CMnH5K8Z7wX8Vpyt2iU84ByB5odXTW6hcCfV PCofKxtt0wRmIshiRMYWhw7mKNm2tCXRxqmnHEY3Oh5CLutSFkd11YObv3Cjn4j9OYx0 KvX9IbMS0os8h+ojlPlYbydOpVkHZ+AHzIE4ALVoK1iw2caehdUAtpPiZZqMIS5CQKya 5gAp4Su1meB+C8Y1bkXLDzyaPWSIFQeVclMBJLXt/GvkQuJcH1ZNpxhmzpVIw+qFeuvC eXYCl6d+4F8zIN6K/5jFKAWaePah0oLEU2EWsF0zoHDuZU0BFFX+wDE3119iBfOLO9w0 D++Q== X-Received: by 10.49.64.136 with SMTP id o8mr469277qes.32.1374125236711; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 22:27:16 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.34.130 with SMTP id z2ls1246703qei.98.gmail; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 22:27:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.28.66 with SMTP id z2mr467375qeg.5.1374125235477; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 22:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 22:27:15 -0700 (PDT) From: la arxokuna To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <5c76f320-ee1a-48d2-b91d-9b162364547a@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <7431048.8HQ9emOxx4@caracal> <51E6B9C2.7070409@gmx.de> <51E6C139.3000000@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [lojban] mivzdacti MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1411_7043055.1374125235213" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_1411_7043055.1374125235213 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:27:20 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote: > > To be honest, I was mostly joking about the fairy tale reference. We can > restrict the lujvo meaning as much as we like, so long as the Lojban > definition is good. > > As for Gleki's remark, in order for an organism to be parasitic, must it > necessarily *eat* its host? > For me yes. Although {xaksu} host's resources might be a better definition. But what I meant is that it is not necessarily inhabit the host, so {zdani} is not one of the defining terms. > If we consider a tapeworm to be a parasite, then the answer is "no", > because the tapeworm eats the host's food rather than the host proper. > However, I have no suggestions as to how to reflect this in the lujvo. > > .i mi'e la tsani mu'o > > > On 17 July 2013 12:07, selpa'i > wrote: > >> It just occured to me that I prefer {mivzdacti} over the other options. >> Apart from tsani's argument, I somehow overlooked that {mivzdacti} doesn't >> need a -sel- to begin with, so my previous post becomes more or less void. >> >> mivzdacti = x1 citka x2 noi jmive gi'e zdani vo'a >> >> >> mu'o mi'e la selpa'i >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to lojban+un...@**googlegroups.com . >> To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com >> . >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**group/lojban >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out >> . >> >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_1411_7043055.1374125235213 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:27:20 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote:
To be honest, I was m= ostly joking about the fairy tale reference. We can restrict the lujvo mean= ing as much as we like, so long as the Lojban definition is good.

<= /div>
As for Gleki's remark, in order for an organism to be parasitic, = must it necessarily *eat* its host?

=
For me yes. Although {xaksu} host's resources might be a better defini= tion. But what I meant is that it is not necessarily inhabit the host, so {= zdani} is not one of the defining terms.
 
If we consider a ta= peworm to be a parasite, then the answer is "no", because the tapeworm eats= the host's food rather than the host proper. However, I have no suggestion= s as to how to reflect this in the lujvo. 

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o


On 17 July 2013 12:07, selpa'i <sel...@gmx.de> wrote:
It just occured to me that I prefer {mivzdac= ti} over the other options. Apart from tsani's argument, I somehow overlook= ed that  {mivzdacti} doesn't need a -sel- to begin with, so my previou= s post becomes more or less void.

mivzdacti =3D x1 citka x2 noi jmive gi'e zdani vo'a


mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at
http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_1411_7043055.1374125235213--