Received: from mail-ye0-f186.google.com ([209.85.213.186]:58852) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1V61vz-0001sQ-If for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 10:17:47 -0700 Received: by mail-ye0-f186.google.com with SMTP id m4sf884822yen.3 for ; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 10:17:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=UFvSp9pF2ifr6O4k0CGwJluRkddW53O7um0ucqKqiZo=; b=MRnSgvclbvsHkqPT90HuDNOGjtsX4YfOpQRv5fgVKC6dFWtInZPk6w49T3iEWUUMf0 1J+FoVGVOPbxmqMGCcaizAZqrHDWaG5SMhLz5m0R3MygfX1yLMfVObgHyZgjp+zI0zQn SXv0reKyYIp++2+7/PcGw+bljyJSy5BgRbE7/NTNfa7V1Tvyp1PsPL7T8YvoZaV1qjHS 9991/4+yodN1KRTQvD+wVzl6k4SHNb3tycifaTYWAQlSCV/JAmCDKdRcbnOg5d62nHio 3lhVYUys+c37hrNhPnw0hTewO1+3+WfqU1ARC62wgicfMtCoqY0f9aMrlkSkCBjNfCuO 5YFw== X-Received: by 10.49.101.5 with SMTP id fc5mr427911qeb.25.1375636649256; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 10:17:29 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.94.163 with SMTP id dd3ls2279699qeb.92.gmail; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 10:17:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.224.69.6 with SMTP id x6mr21481312qai.0.1375636648929; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 10:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.22.74 with SMTP id m10msqab; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 07:32:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.35.225 with SMTP id l1mr428647qej.1.1375626745471; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 07:32:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2013 07:32:24 -0700 (PDT) From: "la gusek." To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <19228f45-67d6-4e04-ac4f-5a08c1968e48@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <27c9c29f-ec16-418f-acfa-250df563ce67@googlegroups.com> References: <27c9c29f-ec16-418f-acfa-250df563ce67@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: Conlangery #92: The Sapir-Worf Hypothesis MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gunnar_secret@hotmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1090_27063405.1375626745051" X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.2 X-Spam_score_int: 12 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yeah, I felt that was quite biased. I mean, sure, it's a controversial topic and there isn't much support for strong Sapir-Whorfianism today. But, they do acknowledge certain different thinking patterns (like the way you memorize an describe experiences or knowing which way is north), but they are very clear with that everything related to Sapir-Whorf is stupid and ridiculous. It seems more of a bashing than a discussion, but that's my five cents. I don't believe in Sapir-Whorf as originally hypothesized though. [...] Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: googlegroups.com] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gunnar_secret[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.2 FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 hotmail.com 'From' address, but no 'Received:' 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature ------=_Part_1090_27063405.1375626745051 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yeah, I felt that was quite biased. I mean, sure, it's a controversial topic and there isn't much support for strong Sapir-Whorfianism today. But, they do acknowledge certain different thinking patterns (like the way you memorize an describe experiences or knowing which way is north), but they are very clear with that everything related to Sapir-Whorf is stupid and ridiculous. It seems more of a bashing than a discussion, but that's my five cents. I don't believe in Sapir-Whorf as originally hypothesized though. Also, Lojban is (of course) mentioned. But they are not discussing it very positive, and somewhat thinking that it's an impossible and ridiculous language to try and learn. Like that they're not seriously believing it could be fun or useful in real life, but a cute attempt of nerds over-believing Sapir-Whorf (and trying to gain "magical abilities"). Laadan seems to be preferred, for some reason. Yeah, that's what I got from it! Worth a listening, but I do not fully agree with them. Seems too much like a contra-cultural reaction to people believing Sapir-Whorf to a extreme level and irritating people with the classic Eskimo-snow-myth. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_1090_27063405.1375626745051 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yeah, I felt that was quite biased. I mean, sure, it's a controversial topi= c and there isn't much support for strong Sapir-Whorfianism today. But, the= y do acknowledge certain different thinking patterns (like the way you memo= rize an describe experiences or knowing which way is north), but they are v= ery clear with that everything related to Sapir-Whorf is stupid and ridicul= ous. It seems more of a bashing than a discussion, but that's my five cents= . I don't believe in Sapir-Whorf as originally hypothesized though.
Also, Lojban is (of course) mentioned. But they are not discuss= ing it very positive, and somewhat thinking that it's an impossible and rid= iculous language to try and learn. Like that they're not seriously believin= g it could be fun or useful in real life, but a cute attempt of nerds over-= believing Sapir-Whorf (and trying to gain "magical abilities"). Laadan seem= s to be preferred, for some reason.

Yeah, that's w= hat I got from it! Worth a listening, but I do not fully agree with them. S= eems too much like a contra-cultural reaction to people believing Sapir-Who= rf to a extreme level and irritating people with the classic Eskimo-snow-my= th.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_1090_27063405.1375626745051--