Received: from mail-la0-f55.google.com ([209.85.215.55]:59068) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VAYjB-0003sJ-SE for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 22:07:13 -0700 Received: by mail-la0-f55.google.com with SMTP id eo20sf455517lab.10 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 22:06:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=VAMO15rkSC0fXruuzMXqu2YfbRTSogKNVAaGOEQG05w=; b=k7CEJDVOcwS6Oslnz650PNAOGz7qfIuSz1oGZ92aj8rpS2X+3OhhodXdgMdoeCtNDq W9xR8hIvkZmxhY2lu158fJGfLXOjLLNt7oJrlhIVsD6YRe2NvLgm8/aEUAaVktu5ZLG+ ibtYO65fNAWarYg2kpQZam9m879gMPLDlFxkc6Y+L+3mdHHJXsfRAE9HXR+jolRPFLBx wnWI19ZlzfLlfWyxguhwyotS/0q7cKzZO4uYYmxMBy07Drd9XRA0Cf7PgWSdjdhlzMR6 WddfPV5YDy/uOV3jB17csXeW2p6z2cpMUzjph7Fhs3F1PuEDtRv2kQWy4ktZDLku0NnX rNxA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=VAMO15rkSC0fXruuzMXqu2YfbRTSogKNVAaGOEQG05w=; b=GvOV2WXoqF5sBzCWyjGiEM8IyJOyOqTdUy4PrO7VwS9cpbjL+7TYAG//5rnL4RNRuy rDLLthRDX7axuVd9zEtB90LlrmljDngaD9qaadAUVsy3Gi9LFHNMLb4N/l07BX8jtZk4 mW4yieWMu/wxVWnKaC2Sktc6w6Afvi1gsy2JgtQtsFB6I27InjzPZRZoOpmDOkXKO4pD tV+BcDwiyXlbPR1LbIEWOHhRzGtRLoig2NlUGxWgkTksyocZba9gApm9TMsXIEOWk/0B f+OrAwAtizxduJhZKucalFdr6+UkbabtzJyGaUmLWktQr6n/U/07cIdLI6jFZAAmY2O7 26LQ== X-Received: by 10.180.39.163 with SMTP id q3mr11150wik.13.1376716017529; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 22:06:57 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.11.105 with SMTP id p9ls316080wib.31.canary; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 22:06:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.20.19 with SMTP id j19mr356657wie.4.1376716016650; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 22:06:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ct9si27921wib.1.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Aug 2013 22:06:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of vastencn@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::235; Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id en1so1439701wid.8 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 22:06:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.35.38 with SMTP id e6mr762473wij.28.1376716016532; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 22:06:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.34.137 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 22:06:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7457C65E-435E-4968-9202-99950F82D7BC@yahoo.com> References: <09305FC7-1862-4AC5-8409-71CE52969691@yahoo.com> <1376665120.29537.YahooMailNeo@web184406.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <20130817003421.GD23845@samsa.fritz.box> <7457C65E-435E-4968-9202-99950F82D7BC@yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:06:56 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Hacking Cursive - 2D aspects for cursive alphabets From: Matthew DeBlock To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: vastencn@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of vastencn@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=vastencn@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) d=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f6427ce1f45e204e41dad00 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --e89a8f6427ce1f45e204e41dad00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 i have tried to avoide this argument because i am quite biased.. but i agree completely with john clifford. What makes you think it takes minutes to write a word in Dscript? because that how long it took you at first try? it took me forever to write chinese characters when i first started earning them.. now i can zip them out in fast cursive.. much like dscript. On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:31 AM, John E. Clifford wrote: > Well, actually it is spang on. Lojban is as useless (and uglier) than > Descript for getting toilet paper at a drugstore. It all depends on > purpose and aesthetic. The writing system is a metaphor for the conlang > game. > > Sent from my iPad > > On Aug 16, 2013, at 19:34, v4hn wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:09:03PM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:40 PM, .arpis. >wrote: > >>> Why should it be? Ithkuil is a perfectly legitimate conlang despite the > >>> fact that it's impossible to speak in real time. > >> > >> I was speaking personally, and about writing systems, not languages. I > >> don't see the point of using a writing system that, well, isn't usable. > > > > Ever tried to ba'e write Ithkuil? Not much better. > > > >> Why would I use a writing system that takes minutes to write one word > when > >> I can use one that takes deciseconds? > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calligraphy > > Writing is just as much an art as it is a tool. > > ta'o I don't understand why cursive should not be usable. > > In the worst case you can always learn "standard" forms of many words > > instead of trying to read each word letter by letter. > > > > This, however, still has nothing to do with lojban. > > > > > > v4hn > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lojban/FyCsPLJ_elo/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --e89a8f6427ce1f45e204e41dad00 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
i have tried to avoide this argument because i am qui= te biased.. but i agree completely with john clifford.

Wh= at makes you think it takes minutes to write a word in Dscript? because tha= t how long it took you at first try? it took me forever to write chinese ch= aracters when i first started earning them.. now i can zip them out in fast= cursive.. much like dscript.


O= n Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:31 AM, John E. Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com= > wrote:
Well, actually it is spang on. =A0Lojban is = as useless (and uglier) than Descript for getting toilet paper at a drugsto= re. =A0It all depends on purpose and aesthetic. The writing system is a met= aphor for the conlang game.

Sent from my iPad

On Aug 16, 2013, at 19:34, v4hn <me@v4hn.d= e> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:09:03PM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:40 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com>wrote:
>>> Why should it be? Ithkuil is a perfectly legitimate conlang de= spite the
>>> fact that it's impossible to speak in real time.
>>
>> I was speaking personally, and about writing systems, not language= s. I
>> don't see the point of using a writing system that, well, isn&= #39;t usable.
>
> Ever tried to ba'e write Ithkuil? Not much better.
>
>> Why would I use a writing system that takes minutes to write one w= ord when
>> I can use one that takes deciseconds?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calligraphy
> Writing is just as much an art as it is a tool.
> ta'o I don't understand why cursive should not be usable.
> In the worst case you can always learn "standard" forms of m= any words
> instead of trying to read each word letter by letter.
>
> This, however, still has nothing to do with lojban.
>
>
> v4hn

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Goog= le Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.go= ogle.com/d/topic/lojban/FyCsPLJ_elo/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@google= groups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--e89a8f6427ce1f45e204e41dad00--