Received: from mail-qc0-f184.google.com ([209.85.216.184]:60911) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VGTuJ-0002sJ-Mo for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 06:11:12 -0700 Received: by mail-qc0-f184.google.com with SMTP id l13sf1159416qcy.21 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 06:10:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=qtPjmjB/a3JdXL5B1oWBCkNMWKg0nerq/Ejo4DjKq9k=; b=QX30t7lucIhLoI1KbFBe4wDs9hyCXgtjYuJth+TsmidUNFIvVxgdarEHYDL4pKawAR Wg/j2cb36EOVllEEHuMGPip5RGYk/1Pslpqt87W9UaXDqLL3M4wFei249gGjZoIeMTLT GI4K0Vib+DwqDJmac5jjPGvAeUBWnLzrVrJxooTZUpg7phQAvBPnuL28uzWkYnsISohE GzQ8HzCp7FdA11672UQguMiOevYT+FdLPXIsAjNB4QREKqwcioki7yd9K6krKdzsCyHI ukGrRj+JBPj8gwpAQx5G9W/ZnhGRNxINXrECpueyMNxrmhPnL0z5uO+hHKtRNNNmVU3I RecA== X-Received: by 10.50.22.98 with SMTP id c2mr668045igf.15.1378127457323; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 06:10:57 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.45.105 with SMTP id l9ls1727736igm.27.canary; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 06:10:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.42.207.206 with SMTP id fz14mr12551373icb.2.1378127456098; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 06:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-x22b.google.com (mail-ob0-x22b.google.com [2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l7si1483885igt.3.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Sep 2013 06:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b; Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id tb18so4523049obb.16 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 06:10:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.213.133 with SMTP id ns5mr17127087obc.62.1378127455784; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 06:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.112.164 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 06:10:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130902084209.GA17067@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20130902084209.GA17067@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 09:10:55 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban: it's not for babies. From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) d=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c344f475143b04e5664d91 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --001a11c344f475143b04e5664d91 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 ka zasti kei cipra .i ro da poi bangu zo'u lo rirni be lo mumei be'o no'u mi ka'e jungau do lo du'u lo selba'u be lo nanca be li ji'ire cu na jai frili fai lo nu jimpe va'o lo nu ba'e da verclubau be ra . ie la lojban vasru so'i zunsna bakfu .i ku'i la gliban ji'a go'i .ije la ru'oban go'i .i ru'a la spaban cu zmadu fi lo ka lo cifnu cu klina bacru ce'u.i jetnu du'o la'a do fa lo du'u lo selylai be lo valsi poi lo verba cu jimpe cu zmadu lo selylai be lo valsi poi lo verba cu bacru. i lo nu le jbocifnu cu jimbe cu se manci .i do gunka va'o lo banli nandu .i do'o xabju lo relbau zdani .ije do tavla fo lo mleca bangu .i lo da'i nu fliba cu na spaji So, reality check here. As a parent of 5, I can tell you, that articulation of almost-2-year-olds ain't exactly easy to understand no matter WHAT their native language is. And yes, lojban is chockful of consonant clusters, but so is English. And Russian. Presumably Spanish would be easier for toddlers to enunciate more clearly. And it's always true, as I"m sure you know, that kids understand far more than what they can produce. The fact they can and do understand it is great, though. You are already working with two strikes against you since you are in a bilingual household, speaking the minority language. Failure would not be surprising. --gjeyspa On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Robin Lee Powell < rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote: > So I'm discovering that Lojban is a pretty crappy language for > toddler-level speech. Throughout this, the caveat "it might be > different if they only heard Lojban" applies, but that's never > likely to happen, so... The twins are 22 months old currently. > > The phonology of Lojban is *so* hard for toddlers that it's not even > funny. It's at the "You really shouldn't try this ever" level of > bad. > > Pro-tip: there is not a toddler in the world that can emit the > difference between {cidja} and {citka}. > > They understand the language well enough, and the structure doesn't > seem to bother them at all, but uttering it is just *so* hard for > them. > > Here are the big issues: > > 1. Every brivla has a consonant clusters. Consonant clusters are > *hard* for children of this age. Even when they attempt them, the > usually fail; they've been trying to say {dirba} for a while, to > please me, but it's mostly "DEE-bah!". > > 2. OMFG are there too many uses of {c} and {s}. It freaking > ridiculous, people. I routinely hit tounge-twister sentences, and > *I'm an adult*, with no known speech impediments. {ro le cifnu cu > citka le cifnu cidja}, which is an entirely reasonable "describing > the world" thing for me to say to the jbocifnu, is hard as hell to > say! A toddler stands no chance. > > 3. They can easily say many cmavo, but cmavo space is *way* too > dense. Even if they can tell the difference when *I* say {.i'e} vs. > {.i'a}, and I'm not sure they can, they couldn't emit the difference > to save their lives. They say something that sounds like {.ai nai}, > and I literally don't know if they mean {.au nai} (which would be > correct/true) or {.e'a/.i'e nai} (which would be amusing imitation). > > That last, as latro'a pointed out in IRC, is especially important > because it means you can't have a baby-talk form of the language: > Lojban is so densely packed that if you remove almost anything, you > get another word, even ignoring that you're suddenly in an entirely > different grammatical category. > > The end result is that while they can, in fact, say {dirba}, they > choose "dada" or "daddy" over {dirba} *every time*. Even though > they adore me to pieces and have very strong desire to please me. > They just hugely prefer to use English because it's *far* easier. > > This is starting to shift slightly (and I mean, like, in the last > 2-3 days), but the difference is still palpable. > > I'm not going anywhere with this, really, and I'm not going to stop > speaking it to them, I just thought I should share. > > -Robin > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --001a11c344f475143b04e5664d91 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=A0 ka zasti kei cipra .i ro da poi bangu zo'u lo= rirni be lo mumei be'o no'u mi ka'e jungau do lo du'u lo s= elba'u be lo nanca be li ji'ire cu na jai frili fai lo nu jimpe va&= #39;o lo nu ba'e da verclubau be ra . ie la lojban vasru so'i zunsn= a =A0bakfu .i ku'i la gliban ji'a go'i =A0.ije la ru'oban g= o'i .i ru'a la spaban cu zmadu fi lo ka lo cifnu cu klina bacru ce&= #39;u.i=A0
jetnu du'o la'a do fa lo du'u lo selylai be lo valsi poi l= o verba cu jimpe cu zmadu lo selylai be lo valsi poi lo verba cu bacru. i l= o nu le jbocifnu cu jimbe cu se manci .i do gunka va'o lo banli nandu .= i do'o xabju lo relbau zdani .ije do tavla fo lo mleca bangu .i lo da&#= 39;i nu fliba cu na spaji


=A0 So, reality check here. =A0As a parent of 5, I = can tell you, that articulation of almost-2-year-olds ain't exactly eas= y to understand no matter WHAT their native language is. And yes, lojban is= chockful of consonant clusters, but so is English. =A0And Russian. =A0Pres= umably Spanish would be easier for toddlers to enunciate more clearly. =A0A= nd it's always true, as I"m sure you know, that kids understand fa= r more than what they can produce. =A0The fact they can and do understand i= t is great, though. =A0You are already working with two strikes against you= since you are in a bilingual household, speaking the minority language. = =A0Failure would not be surprising.

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0--gjeyspa
=



On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
So I'm discovering that Lojban is a pret= ty crappy language for
toddler-level speech. =A0Throughout this, the caveat "it might be
different if they only heard Lojban" applies, but that's never
likely to happen, so... =A0The twins are 22 months old currently.

The phonology of Lojban is *so* hard for toddlers that it's not even funny. =A0It's at the "You really shouldn't try this ever"= ; level of
bad.

Pro-tip: there is not a toddler in the world that can emit the
difference between {cidja} and {citka}.

They understand the language well enough, and the structure doesn't
seem to bother them at all, but uttering it is just *so* hard for
them.

Here are the big issues:

1. =A0Every brivla has a consonant clusters. =A0Consonant clusters are
*hard* for children of this age. =A0Even when they attempt them, the
usually fail; they've been trying to say {dirba} for a while, to
please me, but it's mostly "DEE-bah!".

2. =A0OMFG are there too many uses of {c} and {s}. =A0It freaking
ridiculous, people. =A0I routinely hit tounge-twister sentences, and
*I'm an adult*, with no known speech impediments. =A0{ro le cifnu cu citka le cifnu cidja}, which is an entirely reasonable "describing
the world" thing for me to say to the jbocifnu, is hard as hell to
say! =A0A toddler stands no chance.

3. =A0They can easily say many cmavo, but cmavo space is *way* too
dense. =A0Even if they can tell the difference when *I* say {.i'e} vs.<= br> {.i'a}, and I'm not sure they can, they couldn't emit the diffe= rence
to save their lives. =A0They say something that sounds like {.ai nai},
and I literally don't know if they mean {.au nai} (which would be
correct/true) or {.e'a/.i'e nai} (which would be amusing imitation)= .

That last, as latro'a pointed out in IRC, is especially important
because it means you can't have a baby-talk form of the language:
Lojban is so densely packed that if you remove almost anything, you
get another word, even ignoring that you're suddenly in an entirely
different grammatical category.

The end result is that while they can, in fact, say {dirba}, they
choose "dada" or "daddy" over {dirba} *every time*. =A0= Even though
they adore me to pieces and have very strong desire to please me.
They just hugely prefer to use English because it's *far* easier.

This is starting to shift slightly (and I mean, like, in the last
2-3 days), but the difference is still palpable.

I'm not going anywhere with this, really, and I'm not going to stop=
speaking it to them, I just thought I should share.

-Robin

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+uns= ubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--001a11c344f475143b04e5664d91--