Received: from mail-oa0-f57.google.com ([209.85.219.57]:40262) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VGVRK-0003c9-GT for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:49:22 -0700 Received: by mail-oa0-f57.google.com with SMTP id f4sf1162895oah.2 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:49:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=TXZenWaPSlorwlC2SuwoAnhYtzs7R+lCuxwOJ6JZxag=; b=RHB3DySA/KpFWYel9FREhR1lvPpjwmcBTK4WIHr3nJ7cul9WGTNmJtyGzm2xpCZIrm vfA33Sr5IPPo+O4Qc0orUuQJLoq/O7gT0Ph/O7t37D3IqnrEZRlSXx901QI+FeambVox Bc5FApOVceRTkDmAcKMb+hmYB/3iLFJHwl7PZWDPSPUdFr3ivXzPgupTIgqxKcPwfmOd 6Ay8pPnLxl/Gt12OVRNT+PcjMkZBaxQyqjTIhIVdCluEgqIYCRI3gmdsj8+ZQgC1swyx 0Zy3ag9K3/gekB673bVPkZoNostrpO6+yx+f0WABm3oomdnSfL2zxosTzM/gJIixLw+L xESA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=TXZenWaPSlorwlC2SuwoAnhYtzs7R+lCuxwOJ6JZxag=; b=FGdcQ0XdVljMv9DArDFyXetYInThpKS0uRMYXQb0d9hZoj8XKRXW5fUx0pN1ychrwx V1pL8QBSIZSZC80cu1IjJTfFf61JFcx7LqqfYSsUWByHq66XNfXcjx6+D9rF7Csi8MU2 z+zDRBRQINx90e988S0252I7eRhNsd2n9MAsl3yD5eh9BcD8opNE0LSL1GkpQWHV88l+ elFa/grMIGUThE4p4sl5YN/4xGNiPwfIP5+VlAuzABh+RJl5h6nX72o3qt7N3B68iisG Tbiq4zxI4ZD2Fv+WYaHJY4z+tK+8Jkjd4sVnQL+NApVmHqiMMCed9cIPO0ce51d5AAHy m2Cg== X-Received: by 10.49.1.82 with SMTP id 18mr839qek.15.1378133348022; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:49:08 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.116.135 with SMTP id jw7ls1104769qeb.58.gmail; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:49:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.52.231.226 with SMTP id tj2mr11176vdc.8.1378133347723; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ve0-x230.google.com (mail-ve0-x230.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c01::230]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w20si539699vdg.0.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:49:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::230 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c01::230; Received: by mail-ve0-f176.google.com with SMTP id b10so3124305vea.7 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:49:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.52.34.10 with SMTP id v10mr1984732vdi.28.1378133346574; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:49:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.241.138 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 07:48:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130902084209.GA17067@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20130902084209.GA17067@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> From: MorphemeAddict Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 10:48:35 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban: it's not for babies. To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lytlesw@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::230 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lytlesw@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) d=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307ca3a893697504e567ac0a X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --20cf307ca3a893697504e567ac0a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I appreciate (both senses) what you're going through, but don't expect too much from toddlers. I have a grandniece who just turned two, and while she is bright and precocious, she still speaks barely more than words, and those incompletely. My first son, also bright and precocious, hardly spoke a complete sentence until he was three, but the words he did say were well chosen. Hang in there. I feel like the whole (Lojban) world is watching you with bated breath, hoping it all turns out well. stevo On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Robin Lee Powell < rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote: > So I'm discovering that Lojban is a pretty crappy language for > toddler-level speech. Throughout this, the caveat "it might be > different if they only heard Lojban" applies, but that's never > likely to happen, so... The twins are 22 months old currently. > > The phonology of Lojban is *so* hard for toddlers that it's not even > funny. It's at the "You really shouldn't try this ever" level of > bad. > > Pro-tip: there is not a toddler in the world that can emit the > difference between {cidja} and {citka}. > > They understand the language well enough, and the structure doesn't > seem to bother them at all, but uttering it is just *so* hard for > them. > > Here are the big issues: > > 1. Every brivla has a consonant clusters. Consonant clusters are > *hard* for children of this age. Even when they attempt them, the > usually fail; they've been trying to say {dirba} for a while, to > please me, but it's mostly "DEE-bah!". > > 2. OMFG are there too many uses of {c} and {s}. It freaking > ridiculous, people. I routinely hit tounge-twister sentences, and > *I'm an adult*, with no known speech impediments. {ro le cifnu cu > citka le cifnu cidja}, which is an entirely reasonable "describing > the world" thing for me to say to the jbocifnu, is hard as hell to > say! A toddler stands no chance. > > 3. They can easily say many cmavo, but cmavo space is *way* too > dense. Even if they can tell the difference when *I* say {.i'e} vs. > {.i'a}, and I'm not sure they can, they couldn't emit the difference > to save their lives. They say something that sounds like {.ai nai}, > and I literally don't know if they mean {.au nai} (which would be > correct/true) or {.e'a/.i'e nai} (which would be amusing imitation). > > That last, as latro'a pointed out in IRC, is especially important > because it means you can't have a baby-talk form of the language: > Lojban is so densely packed that if you remove almost anything, you > get another word, even ignoring that you're suddenly in an entirely > different grammatical category. > > The end result is that while they can, in fact, say {dirba}, they > choose "dada" or "daddy" over {dirba} *every time*. Even though > they adore me to pieces and have very strong desire to please me. > They just hugely prefer to use English because it's *far* easier. > > This is starting to shift slightly (and I mean, like, in the last > 2-3 days), but the difference is still palpable. > > I'm not going anywhere with this, really, and I'm not going to stop > speaking it to them, I just thought I should share. > > -Robin > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --20cf307ca3a893697504e567ac0a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I appreciate (both senses) what you're going through, = but don't expect too much from toddlers. I have a grandniece who just t= urned two, and while she is bright and precocious, she still speaks barely = more than words, and those incompletely.=A0

My first son, also bright and precocious, hardly spoke a com= plete sentence until he was three, but the words he did say were well chose= n.=A0

Hang in there. I feel like the whole (Lojban= ) world is watching you with bated breath, hoping it all turns out well.=A0=

stevo


On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
So I'm discovering that Lojban is a pret= ty crappy language for
toddler-level speech. =A0Throughout this, the caveat "it might be
different if they only heard Lojban" applies, but that's never
likely to happen, so... =A0The twins are 22 months old currently.

The phonology of Lojban is *so* hard for toddlers that it's not even funny. =A0It's at the "You really shouldn't try this ever"= ; level of
bad.

Pro-tip: there is not a toddler in the world that can emit the
difference between {cidja} and {citka}.

They understand the language well enough, and the structure doesn't
seem to bother them at all, but uttering it is just *so* hard for
them.

Here are the big issues:

1. =A0Every brivla has a consonant clusters. =A0Consonant clusters are
*hard* for children of this age. =A0Even when they attempt them, the
usually fail; they've been trying to say {dirba} for a while, to
please me, but it's mostly "DEE-bah!".

2. =A0OMFG are there too many uses of {c} and {s}. =A0It freaking
ridiculous, people. =A0I routinely hit tounge-twister sentences, and
*I'm an adult*, with no known speech impediments. =A0{ro le cifnu cu citka le cifnu cidja}, which is an entirely reasonable "describing
the world" thing for me to say to the jbocifnu, is hard as hell to
say! =A0A toddler stands no chance.

3. =A0They can easily say many cmavo, but cmavo space is *way* too
dense. =A0Even if they can tell the difference when *I* say {.i'e} vs.<= br> {.i'a}, and I'm not sure they can, they couldn't emit the diffe= rence
to save their lives. =A0They say something that sounds like {.ai nai},
and I literally don't know if they mean {.au nai} (which would be
correct/true) or {.e'a/.i'e nai} (which would be amusing imitation)= .

That last, as latro'a pointed out in IRC, is especially important
because it means you can't have a baby-talk form of the language:
Lojban is so densely packed that if you remove almost anything, you
get another word, even ignoring that you're suddenly in an entirely
different grammatical category.

The end result is that while they can, in fact, say {dirba}, they
choose "dada" or "daddy" over {dirba} *every time*. =A0= Even though
they adore me to pieces and have very strong desire to please me.
They just hugely prefer to use English because it's *far* easier.

This is starting to shift slightly (and I mean, like, in the last
2-3 days), but the difference is still palpable.

I'm not going anywhere with this, really, and I'm not going to stop=
speaking it to them, I just thought I should share.

-Robin

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+uns= ubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--20cf307ca3a893697504e567ac0a--