Received: from mail-ob0-f186.google.com ([209.85.214.186]:37489) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VGxLi-0002GB-NV for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 13:37:22 -0700 Received: by mail-ob0-f186.google.com with SMTP id er7sf1599545obc.3 for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 13:37:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=SUv7v8rZAwMW8kNKFsciUOpSTeiyy6Ua8FgrkJPxmio=; b=syOVP4AZbde5Wp3tlW8FQ8PxPgHYxL0rcdHo/z0ttknLS8PCxEoNB7RSEh+Gc7gBxG txG+/LAJb2EEL8GVc7yAEFA1Kbe0GLVoZJm+brydz6tsI/4q3nm/pU+56xAgToZEoKiC zd3iO+PCl31NEWegjQjqyABYOlKkgXVP4t2jI1xFu9c08rGLx3Jh88Jlfe0q/eX6+A0s N434gdckzQp8vlsE85wG4GZYr8/RA0siEQ3wmARzN8JjLcczPMjS9rkMWLzx0y+vtP/l sD1FE4EuWlOvYSoPcw7AAB8JkKPrdJjoen32IoLzahXquBXFFA/4dxsNd9BX3ZD3HoT6 7uug== X-Received: by 10.49.71.207 with SMTP id x15mr82654qeu.18.1378240632697; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 13:37:12 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.41.5 with SMTP id b5ls1029651qel.70.gmail; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 13:37:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.224.21.1 with SMTP id h1mr2270742qab.3.1378240632264; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 13:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chausie ([2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id j19si2440249qcv.1.1969.12.31.16.00.00; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 13:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5; Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143B4219DE for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:37:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban: it's not for babies. Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:37:03 -0400 Message-ID: <34462158.0aVyKth4Fk@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-51-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <20130902084209.GA17067@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) smtp.mail=phma@bezitopo.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Monday, September 02, 2013 09:10:55 Michael Turniansky wrote: > ka zasti kei cipra .i ro da poi bangu zo'u lo rirni be lo mumei be'o no'u > mi ka'e jungau do lo du'u lo selba'u be lo nanca be li ji'ire cu na jai > frili fai lo nu jimpe va'o lo nu ba'e da verclubau be ra . ie la lojban > vasru so'i zunsna bakfu .i ku'i la gliban ji'a go'i .ije la ru'oban go'i > .i ru'a la spaban cu zmadu fi lo ka lo cifnu cu klina bacru ce'u.i > jetnu du'o la'a do fa lo du'u lo selylai be lo valsi poi lo verba cu jimpe > cu zmadu lo selylai be lo valsi poi lo verba cu bacru. i lo nu le jbocifnu > cu jimbe cu se manci .i do gunka va'o lo banli nandu .i do'o xabju lo > relbau zdani .ije do tavla fo lo mleca bangu .i lo da'i nu fliba cu na spaji xu lo nu lo drata lojbo cu cafne vitke do gi'e tavla fo la .lojban. kei cu sidju? .ita'o mi da'i cusku lu frili fai lo nu jimpe .iju makau velclibau da li'u > So, reality check here. As a parent of 5, I can tell you, that > articulation of almost-2-year-olds ain't exactly easy to understand no > matter WHAT their native language is. And yes, lojban is chockful of > consonant clusters, but so is English. And Russian. Presumably Spanish > would be easier for toddlers to enunciate more clearly. And it's always > true, as I"m sure you know, that kids understand far more than what they > can produce. The fact they can and do understand it is great, though. You > are already working with two strikes against you since you are in a > bilingual household, speaking the minority language. Failure would not be > surprising. Would it help if other Lojbanists came over often and talked in Lojban? Pierre -- li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.