Received: from mail-wi0-f189.google.com ([209.85.212.189]:36930) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VaobU-00017J-HE for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:19:53 -0700 Received: by mail-wi0-f189.google.com with SMTP id i19sf524442wiw.6 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:19:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8pUNW5IC82vrIJeAEvz3WqgQbP1zbKoDPM5RFosAnqU=; b=t3MVGv1U7phtg6MXilXTDFJjPqZpeaUC4HpZ5EdiA7M2MU/XpK/letJWahCNv+/aEC 35NVgwbRLmgwCrbyIq+9FaXMjZjB0Zmqk5Xj3YGt66qvAlXGaE8TRbo7P2QSuf/HZ26A k+H9LfNYmbJxPKIC+8frA92+icj5lXZTuw1CYfqQsZIS0zE2YKbB2WcTd0jKuuO9qP4F OF//ILe+oVnWEc+NzmLoBJT9TNhJilTmaa/c8SZLxl+fze6wNn+zrv/PpwIk+rRe3JFy cgGxF96kp8FwbYSsNIib0Tkd7mFgqcGo83AVmLZjpD9nlzUYUZ3hxbur+yxFZ2u3kTIZ R3VQ== X-Received: by 10.180.102.10 with SMTP id fk10mr44260wib.21.1382973573404; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:19:33 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.104.97 with SMTP id gd1ls517422wib.37.gmail; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:19:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.14.100.69 with SMTP id y45mr8187913eef.4.1382973572693; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:19:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net. [212.227.15.15]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a1si3232912ees.1.2013.10.28.08.19.32 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:19:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.15.15; Received: from [192.168.2.108] ([93.220.92.204]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LyWAQ-1VmLz81gYQ-015n1V for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:19:32 +0100 Message-ID: <526E8083.6070206@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:19:31 +0100 From: selpa'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Officialness, spin-off projects, dialects, communication with the outside world References: <82e3500a-a054-43bd-bf9e-9c0e3162d39b@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:oSAc+Xws1NSc5m+RXSxNpyWw51PfvzHUfftp3LEvoJj5GixPbbD L7vVqVfDaXV963r24Bw2HQVP50ClDZS1Qfxst2jQUxESmj99NLiXCvJ39ILi6Bbm1hSXGhJ Sn9ajeDb+Tmrw4ZVwKox9KvNbbgN+S60iEXZW1faP/nybHpYJucGY8uLJJ1ysgf9wyKPeTr 4BEtnG6JKHFA+jpw6zFmA== X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / la .iesk. cu cusku di'e > The MediaWiki ('LMW') at lojban.org seems to imply that what I thought > is 'official Lojban' is outdated, and to promote a slightly different > language under the provisional name of La Bangu: > =96 http://mw.lojban.org/index.php/Obsolete:_joiku (note the 'obsolete') > =96 http://mw.lojban.org/index.php/Stub:_La_Bangu > =96 http://mw.lojban.org/index.php/Stub:_Is_Lojban_an_auxlang ('Lojban ha= d > 6 words for "and" [=85]' =85 it does still, doesn=92t it?) > > So, just to get a clear picture: > > What is the language promoted by the LLG ('official Lojban')? Do you really want to get into this discussion? It's all politics. > I *think* it is > http://www.lojban.org/publications/reference_grammar/chapter21.html, and > the rest of CLL, superseded only by confirmed errata, and Xorlo. So, eg, > {lo broda ku joi lo brode} needs the {ku}, and {mi .e do broda} is not > equivalent to *{mi je do broda}. Yes, let's say that's official. So what? That's not very informative, if=20 people have the freedom (and use it) to speak however they want. Needing=20 a {ku} is just annoying, why hang on to it? This is a rhetorical question. > What is the MediaWiki about? Not sure. I think it started out as a way to get a more user-friendly=20 wiki that doesn't have such cluttered pages as the old tiki. Something=20 that a beginner could read and not get confused. Now there are lots of unofficial projects on it, but that's the natural=20 result of the conservative "leadership". The user base is going to do=20 what they think is right, and they will make the changes no matter what. The only difference is whether or not the changes occur through an=20 "official" procedure, say, through discussions + final voting, and=20 whether or not they will be documented properly. There is demand for=20 change, but the conservative party blocks any ambitions. Nothing must=20 change! > I *thought* it was just a supposedly user-friendlier copy and > continuation of the TikiWiki. So, while (as a wiki) chaotic, still (as a > part of lojban.org) about (the agreed-upon, ie 'official' version of) > Lojban. Right, except there is no agreed-upon official version (assuming you=20 don't only talk about grammar, but also semantics, which in my opinion=20 cannot be ignored, but some think Lojban equals Lojban's grammar). > (By the way, I do find the MediaWiki easier to use [well, I try > to ignore some of the scarier add-ons recently installed], and I am > thankful to Gleki for putting so much work into it.) I would like to second this. gleki has been doing a lot. > If, however, the MediaWiki is about a different (version of the) > language, then we should perhaps put a big sign somewhere explaining > that what follows, however more brilliant than 'official Lojban' it may > be, is not the same thing as the language promoted on the rest of > lojban.org. lojban.org's tiki as a whole has never presented a uniform, consistent,=20 single Lojban. There is so much variance among the different tiki pages.=20 There is at least a slight chance that the new wiki will be more=20 uniform, even if what it presents does not match the CLL. Then again,=20 show me two Lojbanists who speak the same language. mu'o mi'e la selpa'i --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.