Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236;
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:24:36 -0700
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Things that would help.
Message-ID: <20131101192436.GG19043@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
References: <20131101003934.GC19043@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <CAAQ0imP3=4UcPd-Wguv4LOxMV4wcua=Er3VqRTD1U9-wKftSeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20131101084202.GE19043@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <767d36e8-da21-49f5-89e2-a6b1124788a5@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <767d36e8-da21-49f5-89e2-a6b1124788a5@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:22:45AM -0700, iesk wrote: > Is
    donating to the LLG via PayPal a 'thing that would help' in the > above sense?
    I mean, money that goes in there can be used by you > for the server and
   stuff, right? [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid

On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:22:45AM -0700, iesk wrote:
> Is donating to the LLG via PayPal a 'thing that would help' in the
> above sense? I mean, money that goes in there can be used by you
> for the server and stuff, right?

We don't *NEED* a new server, it would just be a nice to have, which
is why I haven't asked the LLG to pay for it out of the general
fund, but if people sent money for this purpose, yes, that would
help.

-Robin

-- 
http://intelligence.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
.i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i danfu lu na go'i li'u .e
lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e
lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni li'u

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.