Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of almikes@aol.com designates 205.188.109.201 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.188.109.201;
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:38:07 +0100
From: Wuzzy <almikes@aol.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] jboselkei is back
Message-ID: <20131107173807.7b0f6f7d@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <3534bf0f-d0a8-4b25-a0c8-52945fda2b4b@googlegroups.com>
References: <3534bf0f-d0a8-4b25-a0c8-52945fda2b4b@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  I have a question about jboselkei: What’s the official policy
    regarding non-standard Lojban? I have seen some non-standard usage of Lojban.
    In Lojban, it is strictly wrong but when considering some _proposals_, it
    would be correct. [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: ccc.de]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (almikes[at]aol.com)
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid

I have a question about jboselkei:

What=92s the official policy regarding non-standard Lojban?

I have seen some non-standard usage of Lojban. In Lojban, it is
strictly wrong but when considering some _proposals_, it would be
correct.

Jboselkei should be clear on wheather some of these proposals are
considered correct or not. On some of the more popular proposals,
jboselkei should be explicit.

Some of the popular proposals are:
- dotside (What a stupid name for a proposal by the way! xD)
- experimental gismu
- experimental cmavo
- xorlo

Jboselkei really should have a policy, otherwise, this happens:

Suppose there are the lojbanists A, B, C and D which all know standard
Lojban (Lojban without dotside) and have an equal jboselkei rating.
Lojbanist A knows and uses dotside and translates =93I am
LaPlace.=94 with =93mi'e .laplas.=94.
Lojbanist B knows dotside and is in favor of it and rates 10/10, since
under Lojban with dotside, it would be correct.
Lojbanist C does not know dotside and rates it lower for a mistake,
since =93laplas=94 breaks up into =93la plas=94 in Lojban without dotside.
Lojbanist D also knows dotside but rejects it and rates it lower for the
same reason as C.

This is not good, since the rating basicly depends on wheather the
rater accepts dotside.

I have skipped everything which looks like dotside to me so far.

Note that I do not intend to discuss about wheather dotside
is good; I just want to have a policy regarding non-standard
Lojban.

--=20
Wuzzy
XMPP: Wuzzy2@jabber.ccc.de
E-Mail: wuzzy2@mail.ru

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.