Received: from mail-pa0-f60.google.com ([209.85.220.60]:37416) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VeYGW-0005Yr-7z for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:41:32 -0800 Received: by mail-pa0-f60.google.com with SMTP id ld10sf228788pab.15 for ; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:41:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=2evE4qp3S5SKs6JJhntzU5n3iKUmT7YgcJft0oqGdd0=; b=aTfm5TmhwOklOVlAXsyyC0MBHm4W0SV+JYABzBjOISYcOtP4uu0BXRPjffxjDzZpSr 0Jg4PfkbTdwsBesZA2h63oJT4IBecyPSppjZ0hu1i8tLB3A0QntllkEhncTBg/r338RD IiU97dU041VWh8wBomrVbMs8y2wQAtiq6dwoPfOc36WMjE0+2ZSTYthVWr2cbSFOzm9n wU567cifJioQj88aopRUK1NV+JTnvFJ9fM0J/eDyUK2MwCvhLURAcrjCKoDgcFjw+cE9 2ShQem5iL+iRiR2/HGZVfZwPgcQZPXytZey7Upu1mkrbUm304JlJJhwezKClGiPxiJpx WO4A== X-Received: by 10.50.136.133 with SMTP id qa5mr144177igb.4.1383864082168; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:41:22 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.136.198 with SMTP id qc6ls515122igb.42.canary; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:41:21 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.122.2 with SMTP id lo2mr4013078pab.2.1383864080918; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:41:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vb0-x22e.google.com (mail-vb0-x22e.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22e]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ee5si636548vdb.1.2013.11.07.14.41.20 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:41:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22e; Received: by mail-vb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 10so845292vbe.33 for ; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:41:20 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.58.108.196 with SMTP id hm4mr3292000veb.28.1383864080755; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:41:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.161.48 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:40:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20131107180415.GI20882@samsa.fritz.box> References: <3534bf0f-d0a8-4b25-a0c8-52945fda2b4b@googlegroups.com> <20131107173807.7b0f6f7d@aol.com> <20131107180415.GI20882@samsa.fritz.box> From: MorphemeAddict Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:40:50 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] jboselkei is back To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lytlesw@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lytlesw@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3b4acf37ae904ea9df6c2 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --001a11c3b4acf37ae904ea9df6c2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Don't experimental words (especially cmavo) have special word-shapes, e.g., CV'VV? lujvo are experimental until they're not. Gismu are the only group I can think of that don't have a special shape for experimental forms. stevo On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, v4hn wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 05:38:07PM +0100, Wuzzy wrote: > > Some of the popular proposals are: > > - dotside (What a stupid name for a proposal by the way! xD) > > - experimental gismu > > - experimental cmavo > > - xorlo > > xorlo officially became part of the language years ago. > I don't know whether there also was an official voting for dotside, > but that one is de-facto official as well. > > experimental words on the other hand could be marked as such, I agree. > > All in all you probably listed the least controversial proposal in your > mail .u'iru'e > > > mi'e la .van. mu'o > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --001a11c3b4acf37ae904ea9df6c2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Don't experimental words (especially cmavo) have special= word-shapes, e.g., CV'VV?=A0
lujvo are experimental until they're not.=A0
Gismu are the only grou= p I can think of that don't have a special shape for experimental forms= .=A0

st= evo


On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM,= v4hn <me@v4hn.de> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 05= :38:07PM +0100, Wuzzy wrote:
> Some of the popular proposals are:
> - dotside (What a stupid name for a proposal by the way! xD)
> - experimental gismu
> - experimental cmavo
> - xorlo

xorlo officially became part of the language years ago.
I don't know whether there also was an official voting for dotside,
but that one is de-facto official as well.

experimental words on the other hand could be marked as such, I agree.

All in all you probably listed the least controversial proposal in your mai= l .u'iru'e


mi'e la .van. mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--001a11c3b4acf37ae904ea9df6c2--