Received: from mail-qe0-f63.google.com ([209.85.128.63]:37235) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Vktus-0001gj-FS for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 03:01:31 -0800 Received: by mail-qe0-f63.google.com with SMTP id 2sf1131568qeb.28 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 03:01:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=S0GFITiH7pS/TtfzR9Ytwx8Op2mxzxs9AEz3qh0UToA=; b=Drb4rWY8v8a8YDBqfBsnQHM/0LlJHsW6sqvthKFcfGaboul2EOipRaUf6mcxBDNga9 yj+hX1w7yB0mABUodjfUh863S7g3llxyAheNZdNiFAcuUaLWriejJDh0QitTEAUKdS/X kXkOZfM/2SQ4V1OH6yrNIkmxVb9xLrbsK2uxP2BJzIFTFaWun3Un20jEbuWsccRiakPo M6K7WC4OrZf2zg4JHFoHpE6yyRK0Bk9GddREBJzn3X3pm8XBNP1+MYH6L+/ZQiAleoR1 Y2EEcjQYCoaHfUlC/H5aAwsIOks2vg/p/l31xTWDxxVvyOh0Jo2PKsnA4Y6dCXPOPlCd oflw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=S0GFITiH7pS/TtfzR9Ytwx8Op2mxzxs9AEz3qh0UToA=; b=Mq7wusHRppmvb0vlGpiVRA7a9XRVv4UOvKTt++nTcPQd8Ykc/46IF38wNdiJOtq1p0 imRBgb8rbkcG5G2EtKkTPNsREeEGnX4Fm1t26cSEiboSC4GnpOHkbBfoh+s7EU4iba4w P+IjCe/2/0VAjnOvcocL35mgUsVO9hgCShpQi3VAxFLv2Xbech+/lDQB6nkoKf/qyPIr MG3bzbHERsrINdjswqQFlCoLxc9HWq8j0hJs9e35FF8kbkIw02R26P3GCg4iYfMNXF8j dzcasu/1GowH9dHJrsOHn6oFAuhwystobO7AGSP5fdHUy1vHhz/+4vaw0Y8bD64n7vII 7+UA== X-Received: by 10.49.61.202 with SMTP id s10mr31159qer.21.1385377274806; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 03:01:14 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.0.131 with SMTP id 3ls1002804qee.70.gmail; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 03:01:14 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.49.56.4 with SMTP id w4mr18856qep.26.1385377274252; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 03:01:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 03:01:13 -0800 (PST) From: lorxus To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <522642B1.7010404@lojban.org> References: <522642B1.7010404@lojban.org> Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban: it's not for babies. MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: coronacoreanici@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_70_21174225.1385377273818" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_70_21174225.1385377273818 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 mi denpa le nu jbocifnu nuzba krefu .e'o ko dunda re'i On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 4:12:33 PM UTC-4, lojbab wrote: > > Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Pro-tip: there is not a toddler in the world that can emit the > > difference between {cidja} and {citka}. > > That is interesting, since in English, the sound of dj isn't considered > a consonant cluster. > > > They understand the language well enough, and the structure doesn't > > seem to bother them at all, but uttering it is just *so* hard for > > them. > > > > Here are the big issues: > > > > 1. Every brivla has a consonant clusters. Consonant clusters are > > *hard* for children of this age. Even when they attempt them, the > > usually fail; they've been trying to say {dirba} for a while, to > > please me, but it's mostly "DEE-bah!". > > My only suggestion here is a buffered dialect (dEEr-i-bah). But I'm not > sure how easily toddlers could learn that. > > > 2. OMFG are there too many uses of {c} and {s}. It freaking > > ridiculous, people. I routinely hit tounge-twister sentences, and > > *I'm an adult*, with no known speech impediments. > > I totally agree. The rules we adapted from JCB's algorithm for handling > fricatives and affricates, especially in Chinese which was the most > heavily weighted source language, and is especially rich in those sounds > led to too many c, s, j and z, (and also too many vowel a's) > > But by the time that was clear, remaking the words again was precisely > what we couldn't consider doing, even if we could find better rules. > > > That last, as latro'a pointed out in IRC, is especially important > > because it means you can't have a baby-talk form of the language: > > Lojban is so densely packed that if you remove almost anything, you > > get another word, even ignoring that you're suddenly in an entirely > > different grammatical category. > > That is true, but I think baby talk dialects are prone to eliminating > such conflicting categories. English is pretty dense in short word > space, and also has homonyms of different grammatical categories, but > kids still learn it. > > It would be interesting to learn something about Chinese baby talk. The > word space is so dense that they need 4 tones to keep things > intelligible, and even then many common words are expressed as a lujvo > (compound of 2 or 3 elemental particles that by themselves bear meaning, > often the same meaning as the longer word). Do Chinese kids pick up the > tonal qualities early? > > I've heard it said that Russian kids often don't master their language's > phonology until age 10, and Michael had one of the common childhood > speech impediments at age 6, when he pronounced "Andzhela"s name as > "Anzhoya", which I think means that he couldn't control palatalization. > I think that a Russian dialect without palatalization would be just as > hard to understand as a toddler's version of Lojban. > > > The end result is that while they can, in fact, say {dirba}, they > > choose "dada" or "daddy" over {dirba} *every time*. Even though > > they adore me to pieces and have very strong desire to please me. > > They just hugely prefer to use English because it's *far* easier. > > but dada is a cmene rather than a brivla in most usage (and daddy also, > though it can function a a descriptive noun). The corresponding lojban > baby-talk name might be "dib." or plausibly "dir.", or hearkening back > to Cinderelwood, "paf." > > "relber: la pavber pu darxi mi doi paf > pavber: la relber pu tikpa mi doi paf" > > lojbab > > > > -- > Bob LeChevalier loj...@lojban.org www.lojban.org > President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_70_21174225.1385377273818 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
mi denpa le nu jbocifnu nuzba krefu
.e'o ko dunda
re'i

On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 4:12:33 PM UTC-4, lojbab wrote:=
Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> Pro-tip: there is not a toddler in the world that can emit the
> difference between {cidja} and {citka}.

That is interesting, since in English, the sound of dj isn't considered= =20
a consonant cluster.

> They understand the language well enough, and the structure doesn'= t
> seem to bother them at all, but uttering it is just *so* hard for
> them.
>
> Here are the big issues:
>
> 1.  Every brivla has a consonant clusters.  Consonant cl= usters are
> *hard* for children of this age.  Even when they attempt them= , the
> usually fail; they've been trying to say {dirba} for a while, to
> please me, but it's mostly "DEE-bah!".

My only suggestion here is a buffered dialect (dEEr-i-bah).  But I= 'm not=20
sure how easily toddlers could learn that.

> 2.  OMFG are there too many uses of {c} and {s}.  It fre= aking
> ridiculous, people.  I routinely hit tounge-twister sentences= , and
> *I'm an adult*, with no known speech impediments.

I totally agree.  The rules we adapted from JCB's algorithm for ha= ndling=20
fricatives and affricates, especially in Chinese which was the most=20
heavily weighted source language, and is especially rich in those sound= s=20
led to too many c, s, j and z, (and also too many vowel a's)

But by the time that was clear, remaking the words again was precisely= =20
what we couldn't consider doing, even if we could find better rules.

> That last, as latro'a pointed out in IRC, is especially important
> because it means you can't have a baby-talk form of the language:
> Lojban is so densely packed that if you remove almost anything, yo= u
> get another word, even ignoring that you're suddenly in an entirel= y
> different grammatical category.

That is true, but I think baby talk dialects are prone to eliminating= =20
such conflicting categories.  English is pretty dense in short wor= d=20
space, and also has homonyms of different grammatical categories, but= =20
kids still learn it.

It would be interesting to learn something about Chinese baby talk. &nb= sp;The=20
word space is so dense that they need 4 tones to keep things=20
intelligible, and even then many common words are expressed as a lujvo= =20
(compound of 2 or 3 elemental particles that by themselves bear meaning= ,=20
often the same meaning as the longer word).  Do Chinese kids pick = up the=20
tonal qualities early?

I've heard it said that Russian kids often don't master their language'= s=20
phonology until age 10, and Michael had one of the common childhood=20
speech impediments at age 6, when he pronounced "Andzhela"s name as=20
"Anzhoya", which I think means that he couldn't control palatalization.= =20
  I think that a Russian dialect without palatalization would be j= ust as=20
hard to understand as a toddler's version of Lojban.

> The end result is that while they can, in fact, say {dirba}, they
> choose "dada" or "daddy" over {dirba} *every time*.  Even tho= ugh
> they adore me to pieces and have very strong desire to please me.
> They just hugely prefer to use English because it's *far* easier.

but dada is a cmene rather than a brivla in most usage (and daddy also,= =20
though it can function a a descriptive noun).  The corresponding l= ojban=20
baby-talk name might be "dib." or plausibly "dir.", or hearkening back= =20
to Cinderelwood, "paf."

"relber: la pavber pu darxi mi doi paf
  pavber: la relber pu tikpa mi doi paf"

lojbab



--=20
Bob LeChevalier    loj...= @lojban.org    www.lojban.org
President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
------=_Part_70_21174225.1385377273818--