Received: from mail-qc0-f186.google.com ([209.85.216.186]:43616) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Vp3sx-00047S-K9 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:28:39 -0800 Received: by mail-qc0-f186.google.com with SMTP id e9sf312225qcy.3 for ; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:28:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=dljlWGoh/k7jdljmcxDnASAuvb423ND7q/j6rrZRnII=; b=EDRA3MA6Ze/IaRMgftNTgfHBjUOhjtUEOXkDKb0CSQ5/zbkkG2cTppC5EUiTV5XIU9 y7m+yc1ZLONPI5NSDuSVhfDQujNB/tSzsW33tbDrOiXgohhyDvevLX0Bexoko5dztGeZ IUUaFUm1rQITJRGu/GIor+FEE18i/WL+dX+9HKO564lbm5oDB0sXKe4DjOfiMZqEirCr EW/58ELCzessBG31duvlbY3lAkXnbon1EeSWHURISRAZd1iWVW8e54lg9miOxCLFHhh9 OJBSKl+snB80KGQ/xfZn5ZDSLO5uYeeoHACkox0Szu9BrTX2DdY8rHgk62mrjqz2fb0S 7Z6A== X-Received: by 10.49.95.8 with SMTP id dg8mr74989qeb.24.1386368909343; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:28:29 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.25.42 with SMTP id z10ls1486508qef.63.gmail; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:28:28 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.58.76.129 with SMTP id k1mr2247098vew.19.1386368908856; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:28:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vc0-x22f.google.com (mail-vc0-x22f.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t6si1301765qcj.3.2013.12.06.14.28.28 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:28:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f; Received: by mail-vc0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id ld13so1379433vcb.20 for ; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:28:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.250.4 with SMTP id mm4mr2442745vcb.47.1386368908715; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:28:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.221.5.69 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 14:28:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <529EA55C.40800@kli.org> <20131204145028.65d8aa5f@aol.com> <20131206074058.524db1e8@aol.com> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 20:28:28 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Alice essay From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160c2dc55185d04ece52abc X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --089e0160c2dc55185d04ece52abc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Alex Rozenshteyn wrote: > > In this case {KREFU} is supposed to be a metalinguistic comment; the fact > that it is strangely written makes that more clear than if it had been > written {krefu}. > Yes, "krefu" would have looked like it was a continuation of the preceding sentence. BTW, this is not the only (or the first) use of all-caps in the text. The labels that Alice reads, KO MI PINXE and KO MI CITKA are also written in all-caps. In this case not just because the original does that, but also because there is a DRINK ME in one of the pictures and I thought that made for a better match between text and picture. (Hypocritically, I have a stylistic choice to argue about: I would have, > instead of {lo jukpa lo cifnu cu kansa}, said {lo jukpa .e lo cifnu cu > kansa}; in the original text, the line is "the cook and the baby joined", > not "the cook joined the baby") > But "lo jukpa .e lo cifnu cu kansa" means that each of them was doing something with someone, not that they were doing something together. "lo jukpa joi lo cifnu cu kansi'u" would have worked though. There are a some gismu like kansa, penmi, and a few others where I really don't like it when people use a plural in x1 and leave the x2 unfilled with the intention that it be taken as "reciprocally". mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --089e0160c2dc55185d04ece52abc Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Alex Rozenshteyn <rpglover64@g= mail.com> wrote:
=A0
In this case {KREFU} is supposed to be a metalinguistic comment; the fact = that it is strangely written makes that more clear than if it had been writ= ten {krefu}.

Yes, "krefu&q= uot; would have looked like it was a continuation of the preceding sentence= .

BTW, this is not the only (or the first) use of = all-caps in the text. The labels that Alice reads, KO MI PINXE and KO MI CI= TKA are also written in all-caps. In this case not just because the origina= l does that, but also because there is a DRINK ME in one of the pictures an= d I thought that made for a better match between text and picture.
=A0

(Hypocritically, I have a stylistic choice = to argue about: I would have, instead of {lo jukpa lo cifnu cu kansa}, said= {lo jukpa .e lo cifnu cu kansa}; in the original text, the line is "t= he cook and the baby joined", not "the cook joined the baby"= )

But "lo jukpa= .e lo cifnu cu kansa" means that each of them was doing something wit= h someone, not that they were doing something together. "lo jukpa joi = lo cifnu cu kansi'u" would have worked though.

There are a some gismu like kansa, penmi, and a few oth= ers where I really don't like it when people use a plural in x1 and lea= ve the x2 unfilled with the intention that it be taken as "reciprocall= y".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--089e0160c2dc55185d04ece52abc--