Received: from mail-ie0-f189.google.com ([209.85.223.189]:36016) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Vsqrj-0004Fr-VJ for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 01:23:16 -0800 Received: by mail-ie0-f189.google.com with SMTP id tp5sf1344021ieb.6 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 01:22:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=FT0traPW8Fi23zRBYS8x6nlh7jAHmJeQ9EOQlHJExg8=; b=OZ+QaQpFevltfnMtGbearpckOaabWdp3N5AAc8WnUWIB47hxBY/hAcsUYGPIiModaJ uH70tjBqvspKb9kCoZBU1VyHZ3ODpd0TA+ZjM75hTJmkMj+R3Flm7cmAGHTBUAyiGJkO SRTDZlr5lT51SdXh0WTzmHU9dRkuaxwgt69+FuuXeOs27QXMKF0icvI/j9ApV0Gy3cO5 R8nz1zByb9pm7rexVtO0M1m38bIumI41J9Qh+7jvvAxiOL765XtmteocCMcVicQUGBDi GZfd1M+vFA46pah/TmKFhjG0Tj32fATyjDR67yIwMWIer6/UENJOgn6Zx1nLRFqFR8ag Gxdg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=FT0traPW8Fi23zRBYS8x6nlh7jAHmJeQ9EOQlHJExg8=; b=hIp5vtnP2rcBZB1QgDlw8+2A89OAjx6MponxQNfKw/8buRzpNNdHwsKNGMesspWeKW AcCdVWdnsSHPKoiCsvygY7mGdnhVdJM81Kr10w63OTKyVGqf+9DpFvFhGINqidwtHRpl 054Qhb9Vpc41dWrD7ro673XKdPu6L3NYn7lw2NCaYSAtjVRtIT9SZ9w8Mb2yoNIUgNnq 8c8qfUu1Gqru+FlJ+5l6ROiLQCSwcJR4ngoaIzdSHa0YoCppQ3h1ZJZzDUjdo3c3fP59 Fasax9m6Wri/QpOsWvklYZzMhstwmnP1DvbaaNZf1srERMy4HQLElOtpYWjS/+O01i6z GyQQ== X-Received: by 10.182.28.100 with SMTP id a4mr8796obh.28.1387272172141; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 01:22:52 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.73.165 with SMTP id m5ls855778obv.52.gmail; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 01:22:51 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.182.113.194 with SMTP id ja2mr8751obb.31.1387272171649; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 01:22:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 01:22:51 -0800 (PST) From: lorxus To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <3f955e44-a4ca-4c9c-ba07-ed82f6dcd1d8@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban] Problems with gismu MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: coronacoreanici@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_907_2767528.1387272171152" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_907_2767528.1387272171152 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 coi ro do It seems like for a language that prides itself on regularity, ease of learning and use, and logic, Lojban sure has weird and incomplete gismu. A given gismu can have anywhere from 1 to 5 places of varying types, some of them a sign of gismu bloat, and there are even a few extremely obvious gismu with clear counterparts are excluded. My proposals: first, make all gismu be exactly 3 places long, with the first an agent, the second a patient, and the third a beneficiary - loosely. For gismu like {blanu}, we might have "x1 is blue of shade x2 to observer x3", or something like that; {zdani} might be "x1 is a house for x2 owned by x3". Additionally, we would have a few 1-place gismu to collect all the gismu bloat - things like "x1 is a standard for x2 (ka?) used by x3", "x1 is an epistemology for truths about x2 (du'u) used by x3", or "x1 is a condition/mitigating factor/modifier on event x2 (nu?) affecting x3". As for blatantly missing gismu: why is there no word for salty, but words for sweet, bitter, sour, and spicy? (bonus points for whoever decided to make a lujvo for spicy meaning pain-flavored) Why don't we have gismu for arrive, old, discard, follow (because I assume that jersi does not have this sense), or appear? Why not for otter, or carrot, or dolphin, or any passerine bird? If I am overly inexperienced to talk about this, or there are good reasons for not making one of the few irregular and irritating points of a beautiful language reflect the rest of it, please tell me so. re'isai mi'e lorxus -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_907_2767528.1387272171152 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
coi ro do

It seems like for a language that prides = itself on regularity, ease of learning and use, and logic, Lojban sure has = weird and incomplete gismu.

A given gismu can have anywhere from 1 = to 5 places of varying types, some of them a sign of gismu bloat, and there= are even a few extremely obvious gismu with clear counterparts are exclude= d. My proposals: first, make all gismu be exactly 3 places long, with the f= irst an agent, the second a patient, and the third a beneficiary - loosely.= For gismu like {blanu}, we might have "x1 is blue of shade x2 to observer = x3", or something like that; {zdani} might be "x1 is a house for x2 owned b= y x3".

Additionally, we would have a few 1-place gismu to collect a= ll the gismu bloat - things like "x1 is a standard for x2 (ka?) used by x3"= , "x1 is an epistemology for truths about x2 (du'u) used by x3", or "x1 is = a condition/mitigating factor/modifier on event x2 (nu?) affecting x3".
=
As for blatantly missing gismu: why is there no word for salty, but wor= ds for sweet, bitter, sour, and spicy? (bonus points for whoever decided to= make a lujvo for spicy meaning pain-flavored) Why don't we have gismu for = arrive, old, discard, follow (because I assume that jersi does not have thi= s sense), or appear? Why not for otter, or carrot, or dolphin, or any passe= rine bird?

If I am overly inexperienced to talk about this, or ther= e are good reasons for not making one of the few irregular and irritating p= oints of a beautiful language reflect the rest of it, please tell me so.
re'isai mi'e lorxus

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
------=_Part_907_2767528.1387272171152--