Received: from mail-vb0-f57.google.com ([209.85.212.57]:42205) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Vteh8-0007td-CN for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:35:43 -0800 Received: by mail-vb0-f57.google.com with SMTP id x14sf202743vbb.12 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:35:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=subject:references:from:in-reply-to:message-id:date:to:mime-version :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TXQK3Tzv4xXmMTu8IhbycjzKtUYYH7qx8EwIkv1bJnw=; b=khQilqwyAEzHexvIxJvm3en6A2YpVpk9y0ODBV48TcGNn2FA44w2x9oGfIjGntanP3 U6UKSHXSevCx+O4emGcny30150SP3FEO5L3i1dbajnM/xWNVLgPlWG/EuWP3DNU+Piyz Gbxw2mDOs8A7wb6IMcxrhRFZ19/hzkULeLBXgOEtPJQyOD537N39B1tOzOlN6QhLeeg8 ysbrmROknJ75lXfgUhbl8wHsKwrr0d26Z1XDAcYhuzCLMRwo21vUmKLEKLX3FgrKrd6q +dePQSj9w1z+R4ymUnIab/hltFoDm/MTv++Bd7GO27wMrJ0v841N3A7WUAGKBzea+bGr NJDA== X-Received: by 10.50.30.169 with SMTP id t9mr60305igh.2.1387463715283; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:35:15 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.176.193 with SMTP id ck1ls785128igc.22.gmail; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:35:14 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.42.81.84 with SMTP id y20mr806522ick.10.1387463714689; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:35:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from nm11-vm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm11-vm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com. [98.138.91.104]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id vn2si695993igb.2.2013.12.19.06.35.14 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:35:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.138.91.104 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.138.91.104; Received: from [98.138.100.118] by nm11.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Dec 2013 14:35:14 -0000 Received: from [98.138.84.38] by tm109.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Dec 2013 14:35:14 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp106.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Dec 2013 14:35:14 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 32962.40143.bm@smtp106.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: kD30dGwVM1nkawlob8UFi3OO9iPv3hQKbataJZ5dVqtUanf RnadPa9qWThz2DSChTEDOg_KkXnqxF9wFXIzMY6yA5zFrsEuAaIiNxzJAa.F HHBfLFP9mxKn1reDXXJkacbbYiGBvrYBaQVduKa0r1y9zv3dPZCVeUp8.9vx tgvlzVwCdI_vxAUZFubKUPWQvevMSNy7qCF5P73iaL.jsSLmac.OgLOM5br2 sP3yS4fhpKKP1hjVGYZCdb.H.og10tFOASLaMxfsICJVVhDSUgideoI792kS 8yZ2TOomOiBVj22dlqvPLfuZqf5BRzP0dGolCRa54RfCb2ZfpSkYC46BQIfi p8iPaXv8ihuECwY.uVv_4wO5zALNAYeprl0eAGI4gngM0KNqzwn9x9flsA3X RSij2nTDEjHhgDGDdl6dH5jOjoz5q1wKyfY9uOBYQ07fHOKm0PW8Ma1L0k15 uuge9nEcnmHGX64ChiVdGuGt.en9XF9mPOVRb3cDIzEQTIJLL41U0g1mUMWp CRcAcTwWinfHz2Z4Sf6S8a6BhFuFc1V9nme78_0PW4nAIowDGaUNpT8SXfuI 3TfsXEd0D6X4_X_Iv9YtXmw8gcZo0scL3rVs8BHYjHjw_fIHRCFUYvHacmPt 3_nbsHdb5MMdlQyySfeswoa5y79b368PzSGDcy360YuhA4Ad.AWqzx5E0VAI r46j7e_gbpYmAqXyfkZqD0HsoL5z9qAXclZN4Zb_DT4rUnhLOgAbHdxsucou bUVhVy5DNZLeXqMzHOx4AoMWQwzQpiHWuy.YalDl_vvlLpqb8t.2s.fIgJ.c s32RphMYVPMb0YRgksDioVUngYzDApg.2YPmsI09VTMXKCaJb3CuFE.k6H17 JHW8rjHmYLlGPRbW9q50R2EEzjb86s3T_ws8CJP8lUGNgggB5a1FNcynNwVH cb8hYAAcyPigrx5a0j3lOXIn5S.Ho.DFHbD6sM8R0TMUZLnjaQm1vZKKbyfc - X-Yahoo-SMTP: xvGyF4GswBCIFKGaxf5wSjlg3RF108g- X-Rocket-Received: from [192.168.1.68] (kali9putra@99.92.109.82 with xymcookie [216.39.61.254]) by smtp106.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Dec 2013 06:35:13 -0800 PST Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Problems with gismu References: <3f955e44-a4ca-4c9c-ba07-ed82f6dcd1d8@googlegroups.com> <69230493-942e-4bc9-983c-299bd6eb8a84@googlegroups.com> From: "John E. Clifford" X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:35:13 -0600 To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.138.91.104 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-60DF8732-1848-4E5B-BA9B-345C52C0AAA9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.0 X-Spam_score_int: 10 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The fundamental problem with semantic prime languages was dealt with already by Aristotle (the system is either incomplete or circular), though not explicitly about language. The various choices to take once the first problem is overcome (either way) can be justified in various way;in the case {vrusi 1}, both practicality and philosophy favor the prototype approach, but it does lack precision. (blood tastes salty because it contains salt, after all). [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (kali9putra[at]yahoo.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 'From' yahoo.com does not match 'Received' headers 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature --Apple-Mail-60DF8732-1848-4E5B-BA9B-345C52C0AAA9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The fundamental problem with semantic prime languages was dealt with alread= y by Aristotle (the system is either incomplete or circular), though not ex= plicitly about language. The various choices to take once the first proble= m is overcome (either way) can be justified in various way;in the case {vru= si 1}, both practicality and philosophy favor the prototype approach, but i= t does lack precision. (blood tastes salty because it contains salt, after = all). Sent from my iPad On Dec 19, 2013, at 5:37, Gleki Arxokuna wrote= : >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:44 PM, lorxus wrote= : > I didn't know that loCCan was a thing that was actually going to occur; I= had assumed it was entirely theoretical. >=20 > so once they created "xorban". So .. where is the grammar? >=20 > And in terms of semantic regularisation such language is impossible to cr= eate. This issue is more than 300 years old. > In that case, I'd prefer conservation of the current language with maybe = a few changes to some particularly bad gismu, and definitely a few new gism= u, such as the ones I named before, (By the way, other things produce a sal= ty taste than table salt. How would you say "The blood is salty" in Lojban?= My best guess is {lei ciblu cu vu'ismimlu loi silna}.) >=20 > I don't know why vrusi1 is a property. I'd prefer a taste prototype there= . > But i think it should be=20 >=20 > {lo ciblu cu se vrusi lo silna} >=20 > Personally I am unhappy (ita'osai ku'i mi'e la gleki) with the {vrusi} it= self. > The issue with sensory gismu is discussed here. > The issue of property/object difference is discussed here. >=20 > Thus I put {kukte} and {silna} in the same semantic class. >=20 > and then to bring these lessons more completely into loCCan. (which will = hopefully be the fantastic perfect logical language and everyone will be im= pressed and happy forever zo'ocu'i) >=20 >=20 > On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 4:22:51 AM UTC-5, lorxus wrote: > coi ro do >=20 > It seems like for a language that prides itself on regularity, ease of le= arning and use, and logic, Lojban sure has weird and incomplete gismu.=20 >=20 > A given gismu can have anywhere from 1 to 5 places of varying types, some= of them a sign of gismu bloat, and there are even a few extremely obvious = gismu with clear counterparts are excluded. My proposals: first, make all g= ismu be exactly 3 places long, with the first an agent, the second a patien= t, and the third a beneficiary - loosely. For gismu like {blanu}, we might = have "x1 is blue of shade x2 to observer x3", or something like that; {zdan= i} might be "x1 is a house for x2 owned by x3".=20 >=20 > Additionally, we would have a few 1-place gismu to collect all the gismu = bloat - things like "x1 is a standard for x2 (ka?) used by x3", "x1 is an e= pistemology for truths about x2 (du'u) used by x3", or "x1 is a condition/m= itigating factor/modifier on event x2 (nu?) affecting x3". >=20 > As for blatantly missing gismu: why is there no word for salty, but words= for sweet, bitter, sour, and spicy? (bonus points for whoever decided to m= ake a lujvo for spicy meaning pain-flavored) Why don't we have gismu for ar= rive, old, discard, follow (because I assume that jersi does not have this = sense), or appear? Why not for otter, or carrot, or dolphin, or any passeri= ne bird?=20 >=20 > If I am overly inexperienced to talk about this, or there are good reason= s for not making one of the few irregular and irritating points of a beauti= ful language reflect the rest of it, please tell me so. >=20 > re'isai mi'e lorxus > --=20 > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an= email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >=20 > --=20 > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an= email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --Apple-Mail-60DF8732-1848-4E5B-BA9B-345C52C0AAA9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
The fundamental problem w= ith semantic prime languages was dealt with already by Aristotle (the syste= m is either incomplete or circular), though not explicitly about language. =  The various choices to take once the first problem is overcome (eithe= r way) can be justified in various way;in the case {vrusi 1}, both practica= lity and philosophy favor the prototype approach, but it does lack precisio= n. (blood tastes salty because it contains salt, after all).

Sent fr= om my iPad

On Dec 19, 2013, at 5:37, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>= wrote:




On T= hu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:44 PM, lorxus <coronacoreanici@gmail.com= > wrote:
I didn't know that loCCan w= as a thing that was actually going to occur; I had assumed it was entirely = theoretical.

so once they created "xorban". So .. where= is the grammar?

And in terms of semantic regulari= sation such language is impossible to create. This issue is more than 300 years old.
In that case, I'd prefer c= onservation of the current language with maybe a few changes to some partic= ularly bad gismu, and definitely a few new gismu, such as the ones I named = before, (By the way, other things produce a salty taste than table salt. Ho= w would you say "The blood is salty" in Lojban? My best guess is {lei ciblu= cu vu'ismimlu loi silna}.)

I don't know why vrusi1 is a property. I'd= prefer a taste prototype there.
But i think it should be 

{lo ciblu cu se vrusi lo silna}

Personally I am unhappy (ita'osai ku'i mi'e la gleki) with the {= vrusi} itself.
The issue with sensory gismu is discussed here.
The issue of property/object difference is discussed here.

Thus I put {kukte} and {si= lna} in the same semantic class.

and then to= bring these lessons more completely into loCCan. (which will hopefully be = the fantastic perfect logical language and everyone will be impressed and h= appy forever zo'ocu'i)


On Tuesday, December 17, 2013 4:22:51 AM UTC-5, l= orxus wrote:
coi ro= do

It seems like for a language that prides itself on regularity, ease of = learning and use, and logic, Lojban sure has weird and incomplete gismu.
A given gismu can have anywhere from 1 to 5 places of varying types, = some of them a sign of gismu bloat, and there are even a few extremely obvi= ous gismu with clear counterparts are excluded. My proposals: first, make a= ll gismu be exactly 3 places long, with the first an agent, the second a pa= tient, and the third a beneficiary - loosely. For gismu like {blanu}, we mi= ght have "x1 is blue of shade x2 to observer x3", or something like that; {= zdani} might be "x1 is a house for x2 owned by x3".

Additionally, we would have a few 1-place gismu to collect all the gism= u bloat - things like "x1 is a standard for x2 (ka?) used by x3", "x1 is an= epistemology for truths about x2 (du'u) used by x3", or "x1 is a condition= /mitigating factor/modifier on event x2 (nu?) affecting x3".

As for blatantly missing gismu: why is there no word for salty, but wor= ds for sweet, bitter, sour, and spicy? (bonus points for whoever decided to= make a lujvo for spicy meaning pain-flavored) Why don't we have gismu for = arrive, old, discard, follow (because I assume that jersi does not have thi= s sense), or appear? Why not for otter, or carrot, or dolphin, or any passe= rine bird?

If I am overly inexperienced to talk about this, or there are good reas= ons for not making one of the few irregular and irritating points of a beau= tiful language reflect the rest of it, please tell me so.

re'isai mi= 'e lorxus

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--Apple-Mail-60DF8732-1848-4E5B-BA9B-345C52C0AAA9--