Received: from mail-pb0-f59.google.com ([209.85.160.59]:33555) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Vtsps-0006Qi-Og for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:41:41 -0800 Received: by mail-pb0-f59.google.com with SMTP id un15sf341224pbc.4 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:41:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x_cmae_category:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=VQqw00CjyoXDtWPSij952fuq+vkRgTiYfMGbmaw1bdo=; b=RFPEqLXCpZG95uSFc1/thHkEmr7KAN/ASXabopqbPXkGmZV6m8YuZjZNao0EEHxoXE UgHfRHRe1tZa14W8b4eAs7e8xWKYV6nl7lQaI/a6DG9kor/I7hUAKCFrg79YXxQttjOj Mm+wQI9jbuyHfln6MDkMa7avli0MdAafkiZhBw6Uig4XdRViRpLCpVKcJLRt4VsDgnyz SucTw/LsrnUAXc6chtvEjwb7ct3qS9yWTzozg9fucuvrU1GMbYmHIx/6+/jJyT62/t7c ui/KCKmUwQs+aG2Xgx25+FxqdtyHTaVnhXsY8oMLBjvXm6itGma1i/foCGchSdjFDQdW 3O+Q== X-Received: by 10.50.73.99 with SMTP id k3mr166888igv.9.1387518069171; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:41:09 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.47.105 with SMTP id c9ls1217165ign.0.gmail; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:41:08 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.47.18 with SMTP id z18mr3365182igm.1.1387518068142; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:41:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.hughes.net (smtp-fo.hughes.cmh.synacor.com. [69.168.97.50]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id iq5si831374igb.1.2013.12.19.21.41.07 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:41:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 69.168.97.50 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=69.168.97.50; X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Btukn+n5 c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=y6Pm+X1iJNCgZrzUuX1tgw==:117 a=y6Pm+X1iJNCgZrzUuX1tgw==:17 a=K-v-2zaBAAAA:8 a=zVhCMP2oAawA:10 a=Yr05hP5UdKEA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=JNFw9bs7AAAA:8 a=4RBUngkUAAAA:8 a=JTGC3Ng4Q3AA:10 a=b1EyDGYn6zzi0Evk8skA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Received-SPF: neutral (smtp02.hughes.cmh.synacor.com: 67.44.192.45 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of bezitopo.org) Received: from [67.44.192.45] ([67.44.192.45:18700] helo=leopard.ixazon.lan) by smtp.hughes.net (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-SHA) id FC/93-21114-278D3B25; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:41:07 -0500 Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by leopard.ixazon.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A91422D for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:40:56 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] mi puba'o fanva Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:40:54 -0500 Message-ID: <2016633.RUblp2nazY@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-56-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1554030.Kqy3VzX5Yp@caracal> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 69.168.97.50 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) smtp.mail=phma@bezitopo.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Thursday, December 19, 2013 21:03:18 lorxus wrote: > My guess is that it is meant to be surreal and barely sensible, but that > it should be taken loosely to mean that after the tractors have tract-ed > along the spiral paths, (which originated in a special spot) then at points > equidistant along the arms of the spiral, salt blocks are placed. As for > the lujvo, forgot I need to glue vowel-ending rafsi together. Why is > {jvajvo} valid, though? "jvajvo" cannot be split into two cmavo; "du'ida'o" can. > Not sure if this works, on reflection. Source text talks about the machine > *weighing* 17.3 tons, and thus the tons cannot be metric. What would be a > good gismu to use here? "Weigh" is often used as a verb when talking about mass. There isn't a gismu for "ton". I'd keep "megygra". Pierre -- loi mintu se ckaji danlu cu jmaji -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.