Received: from mail-pb0-f64.google.com ([209.85.160.64]:37210) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Vu17f-0000mm-BH for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:32:22 -0800 Received: by mail-pb0-f64.google.com with SMTP id rp16sf438020pbb.9 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:32:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x_cmae_category:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=63meu1OR7cUrcScWuXpNr/1sCGEDnQG8H9YOR3xS6zM=; b=p0C5e+LFcy6C6uTC9IhYclKIhKAoXeY2Z+2aWbuP5ofm1EDFmeIoEz2jot98clc/iz 8VVHExvoUnwKdn/W+pY5WlEVKpByCO5z3/8LI6GJGHAX9ThebuLgTS0AFZRP8gXdV+rv Mue3phhi2W631DuUhpDsKOIPqjYduLVnz1s/LSlmgn046887aecTYt7MBDINjVIXQTSZ J7u1P3Gp0eI+Szv8wEBbxQlbns8Cp5xBiRnEjCzqa3mW++TllEoW6GziNwBrdb0W81uV DAb9LnXcU9CwYfVZuOnd3jxk3fNaKMJEWvZgoCGg5PiTQwPXFPvz83JExwaFfOcDWK+r j5YA== X-Received: by 10.182.181.42 with SMTP id dt10mr16054obc.16.1387549929094; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:32:09 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.229.104 with SMTP id sp8ls466853obc.33.gmail; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:32:08 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.182.153.68 with SMTP id ve4mr3453412obb.39.1387549928859; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:32:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.hughes.net (smtp-fo.hughes.cmh.synacor.com. [69.168.97.50]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id m5si491665igk.2.2013.12.20.06.32.08 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:32:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 69.168.97.50 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=69.168.97.50; X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Btukn+n5 c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=y6Pm+X1iJNCgZrzUuX1tgw==:117 a=y6Pm+X1iJNCgZrzUuX1tgw==:17 a=K-v-2zaBAAAA:8 a=zVhCMP2oAawA:10 a=T6DwixzWmosA:10 a=Yr05hP5UdKEA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=JNFw9bs7AAAA:8 a=4RBUngkUAAAA:8 a=5ASeqf3qlbEA:10 a=VwOKkY9c_ERIMbJkD3QA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Received-SPF: neutral (smtp02.hughes.cmh.synacor.com: 67.44.192.45 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of bezitopo.org) Received: from [67.44.192.45] ([67.44.192.45:41506] helo=leopard.ixazon.lan) by smtp.hughes.net (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-SHA) id 7B/96-21114-7E454B25; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:32:08 -0500 Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by leopard.ixazon.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59EA1815 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:31:57 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Problems with gismu Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:31:55 -0500 Message-ID: <1631893.tefe0xbQy3@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-56-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <3f955e44-a4ca-4c9c-ba07-ed82f6dcd1d8@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 69.168.97.50 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) smtp.mail=phma@bezitopo.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Thursday, December 19, 2013 23:40:16 lorxus wrote: > .iepei .uisai > > Not quite, though. We use KCl for salt, too, sometimes. But more or less! I > also have somewhat of a problem with the inconsistency of forced to'e use: > we have zunle/pritu, nenri/bartu, stali/cliva, tordu/clani, hell, even > blanu/narju and glare/lenku. But we're forced to use to'e constructions for > words like arrive, discard, and old. (And for that matter, how do you even > mark deixis (go/come distinction) in Lojban, anyway?) With the deixis words ti, ta, or tu in x2 or x3. The go/come distinction is not universal; Hebrew instead contrasts enter/exit (ba'/tse'). "Disappear" is the opposite of "appear" (which is opposite to how Lojban does it - canci/tolcanci) but "discard" is not the opposite of "card". And in Spanish "desnudo" (lunbe) is not the opposite of "nudo" (jgena); Latin "nudus" and "nodus" fell together, and they added a prefix to distinguish them. As to "silna", I think it should be a general term for all sorts of chemical salts, table salt, or sea salt, and we should make lujvo for when we want to distinguish them. But there's only one "composition" place, and a salt is composed of positive ions and negative ions, which can be varied independently. Pierre -- loi mintu se ckaji danlu cu jmaji -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.