Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22f;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <520032ce-f5db-497b-87bb-c151a5496902@googlegroups.com>
References: <CAO7bV+g+7Tpfr1pFA1eTmbuH-z=Wjihd7y-VNU4iMFaK9N9F_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+4hugsxBLxNMQrCL7XtSrXjDRRnxJAbs44o_XWfqad832seFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7bV+gWRRxkxFqC1LBK2qkpvZET2Ss=OR=0utcmAgn=QAkYhg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+4hugtXZe=gwgsTHTqQVXiH8sD-LoQ7hJx-iUgA9-JUWibhbw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+4hugvffhZFeUfgdfLN_MEquWpavojFUvK6Sqjw6qAbwFH6ww@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7bV+gvhUzJRrT06bdc8un+CMErzb_v16q36ZE6drUahXVsLw@mail.gmail.com>
	<6c574e80-490a-49fc-9993-b063ae4430c7@googlegroups.com>
	<CAO7bV+jDZLMU2W1nrPxVrHcx73snwuWGvcS9R5pQ7Gh6gy9iQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<520032ce-f5db-497b-87bb-c151a5496902@googlegroups.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 04:31:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMKwHj3Tja=7_otk+k4q2DL8zj_-9oRyBNdBt6hgmjsPby=g3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: gismu algorithm (was: [lojban] "salty")
From: Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bea31a6df6a8704ee1ddae5
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

--047d7bea31a6df6a8704ee1ddae5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 3:57 AM, iesk <pa.fae@gmx.de> wrote:

> The developers of the algorithm apparently think that 'meaningless'
> grammatical affixes would merely ruin the results. I think they have a
> point, but, whatever. The importance of the gismu algorithm shouldn't be
> overstated.
>

It has importance? When did that happen? I always figured it was created to
save effort on creating 1400+ words. Or to put it another way, it was
created for reasons of (understandable) laziness.

Personally, I don't think it's necessary for determining the form of one or
two *experimental* gismu. On a case by case basis, I'm certain a human
would be much better at it.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--047d7bea31a6df6a8704ee1ddae5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On S=
un, Dec 22, 2013 at 3:57 AM, iesk <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:p=
a.fae@gmx.de" target=3D"_blank">pa.fae@gmx.de</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><span style>The developers of the algorithm apparentl=
y think that &#39;meaningless&#39; grammatical affixes would merely ruin th=
e results. I think they have a point, but, whatever. The importance of the =
gismu algorithm shouldn&#39;t be overstated.</span><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">It has =
importance? When did that happen? I always figured it was created to save e=
ffort on creating 1400+ words. Or to put it another way, it was created for=
 reasons of (understandable) laziness.<br>
<br>Personally, I don&#39;t think it&#39;s necessary for determining the fo=
rm of one or two *experimental* gismu. On a case by case basis, I&#39;m cer=
tain a human would be much better at it.<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra=
">
<br>.i.e&#39;ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo&=
#39;o<br>(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )<br>
</div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out=
">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br />

--047d7bea31a6df6a8704ee1ddae5--