Received: from mail-vc0-f190.google.com ([209.85.220.190]:34172) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Vus7R-0006dV-I4 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:07:51 -0800 Received: by mail-vc0-f190.google.com with SMTP id lh14sf887724vcb.17 for ; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:07:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=iel4U1n+USXIXgqLxOdOwbweu2rNP/4f+bPFPxoBVU4=; b=C9qTjcTETgu2HiYbJvhLcHTXFaCjS94rlecrOVyOeEnVDQHDHNqHJwHZOr7X/A64Ip D8D+A5wB/L8Pu/Elz/ZvJOsfEBnbPD7Ailz2bMSROztZ/GHPeDuqCuwBN5pL1H+gt3R4 Tf/K4Axtyc15lmQuj9gmA8iACXpjLJsur6Dop0zZfd30nowQ2CWLUuh/LwZW9dbcpcMT jftD7s/8YFc+e4lvQquOF/Fq+LSLSuFYwoxaABhC0eQK9bMBKZb76flia5sbYTl3vJ/3 G+L/A4ibB8uW6YSyOILildlgJMwtMaeMxcUHMiiI5Fxr2rQuAAdkYrl9iQ/ShQ2QRa65 njHQ== X-Received: by 10.49.16.168 with SMTP id h8mr286545qed.2.1387753647285; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:07:27 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.49.120.164 with SMTP id ld4ls1401658qeb.51.gmail; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:07:26 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.49.82.45 with SMTP id f13mr305qey.20.1387753646916; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:07:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:07:26 -0800 (PST) From: iesk To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <60e6003b-c08e-44e6-8eff-c8dd7c30d447@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <6c574e80-490a-49fc-9993-b063ae4430c7@googlegroups.com> <520032ce-f5db-497b-87bb-c151a5496902@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] completely off-topic MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: pa.fae@gmx.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_254_4780668.1387753646114" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_254_4780668.1387753646114 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le dimanche 22 d=E9cembre 2013 22:49:13 UTC+1, aionys a =E9crit : > > > As I said, I'm not talking about pro-sumti. > I think bare letteral {denpa bu} acts as a pro-sumti. That's why I fail to= =20 understand your sentence the way I believe it is meant to be understood. >The Dot Side doesn't refer to using letterals as pro-sumti, as in the=20 {by.} in {la.benjis. gerku .i by. barda}. It refers to >the practice of leading cmevla with a "." so that the *letteral* groups=20 "la", "lai", and "doi" can be used in them. (As for >example {la.doitcland.} or {la.las,andjeles.}). I understand that. But Dot Side doesn't change the way bare letterals are= =20 interpreted as anaphora. The weird thing about {denpa bu} as an anaphora is= =20 that it is unlikely to be used as such, since the words it could possibly= =20 refer to can't start with denpa bu. (Although, technically, they can, since= =20 every 'vowel-initial' word starts with {.V=85}, but the canonical anaphora = is=20 of course {.V bu}, not {denpa bu}. Which makes sense.) I think that {me'o denpa bu} is the way to say 'dot' (in the lerfu sense),= =20 cf. . But I'll be happy to be corrected, I= =20 tend to not get the subtleties. (By the way, {lasandjeles} is not a well-formed word, even under Dot Side;= =20 {ndj} is not a valid cluster.) --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_254_4780668.1387753646114 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Le dimanche 22 d=E9cembre 2013 22:49:13 UTC+1, aionys a = =E9crit :

As I said, I'm not ta= lking about pro-sumti.

I= think bare letteral {denpa bu} acts as a pro-sumti. That's why I fail to u= nderstand your sentence the way I believe it is meant to be understood.
=
>The Dot Side doesn't refer to using letterals as pro-sumti, as in t= he=20 {by.} in {la.benjis. gerku .i by. barda}. It refers to
>the practice = of=20 leading cmevla with a "." so that the letteral groups "la", "lai", a= nd "doi" can be used in them. (As for
>example {la.doitcland.} or {la= .las,andjeles.}).

I understand that. But Dot Side doesn't change the= way bare letterals are interpreted as anaphora. The weird thing about {den= pa bu} as an anaphora is that it is unlikely to be used as such, since the = words it could possibly refer to can't start with denpa bu. (Although, tech= nically, they can, since every 'vowel-initial' word starts with {.V=85}, bu= t the canonical anaphora is of course {.V bu}, not {denpa bu}. Which makes = sense.)

I think that {me'o denpa bu} is the way to say 'dot' (in the= lerfu sense), cf. <http://dag.github.io/cll/17/10/>. But I'll be hap= py to be corrected, I tend to not get the subtleties.

(By the way, {lasandjeles} is not a well-formed word, even under Dot Sid= e; {ndj} is not a valid cluster.)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
------=_Part_254_4780668.1387753646114--