Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 69.168.97.50 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=69.168.97.50;
X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=U9arU4bu c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=Z2Pgg/vgYxdHLJ9+hxtZow==:117 a=Z2Pgg/vgYxdHLJ9+hxtZow==:17 a=K-v-2zaBAAAA:8 a=_WQhAotw1e0A:10 a=Yr05hP5UdKEA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=JNFw9bs7AAAA:8 a=4RBUngkUAAAA:8 a=mC2NRXsm5tAA:10 a=oPIAUB-sXfvB9r7A77kA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10
X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.hughes.cmh.synacor.com: 67.44.192.11 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of bezitopo.org)
Received: from [67.44.192.11] ([67.44.192.11:4071] helo=leopard.ixazon.lan)
	by smtp.hughes.net (envelope-from <phma@bezitopo.org>)
	(ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-SHA) 
	id B6/3B-03321-194C0C25; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 19:55:46 -0500
Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by leopard.ixazon.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49D219A8
	for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 19:55:36 -0500 (EST)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] lo fraso gimste
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 19:55:35 -0500
Message-ID: <37528986.4iYli7cqRz@caracal>
User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-57-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAO7bV+j98aOK178LGwnMCF1=tzzQLYi9YvrG_Pjc99VdOzp3dg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO7bV+j98aOK178LGwnMCF1=tzzQLYi9YvrG_Pjc99VdOzp3dg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=neutral
 (google.com: 69.168.97.50 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess
 record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) smtp.mail=phma@bezitopo.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  I'm not sure "considérable" is the right gloss word for "banli".
    I'm thinking "formidable", but that might be understood as the slang word
    "cool" (I'm not that up on slang). Is "magne" still in use, or does French
    use "grand" for both "banli" and "barda" with the distinction left to context?
    (I left a note in the spreadsheet.) [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: googlegroups.com]
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid

I'm not sure "consid=E9rable" is the right gloss word for "banli". I'm thin=
king=20
"formidable", but that might be understood as the slang word "cool" (I'm no=
t=20
that up on slang). Is "magne" still in use, or does French use "grand" for=
=20
both "banli" and "barda" with the distinction left to context? (I left a no=
te=20
in the spreadsheet.)

I know one sentence with "magne" in it, but it's contrived. Gal, amant de l=
a=20
Reine, alla, tour magnanime, galamment de l'ar=E8ne =E0 la Tour Magne =E0 N=
=EEmes.

Pierre
--=20
li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.