Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.17.20 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.17.20;
Message-ID: <52CADCB8.5090907@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:41:28 +0100
From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] [oz] {laldo} vs. {tolci'o}
References: <CALMa68qFSGKBC6YJ4LYVuw7d-59VAw1x2dE+VVZ4wPzjJJD7jQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALMa68qFSGKBC6YJ4LYVuw7d-59VAw1x2dE+VVZ4wPzjJJD7jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

la .asiz. cu cusku di'e
> coi selpa'i

(to ta'o .e'o mi'e ba'e *la* selpa'i toi)

> In your translation, both {laldo} and {tolci'o} occur. In
> http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/laldo
> the notes include "(= tolci'o)".
>
> Do you really use them interchangeably?

They mean exactly the same to me. I'm not too happy about needing {to'e} 
to get the opposites of so many gismu (I would prefer them to be 
separate gismu), but I know that {laldo} is not official. I think where 
I used it in the text, I was just too lazy to write {tolci'o}.

mi'e la selpa'i mu'o

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.