Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 20:33:13 -0200
Message-ID: <CALMa68oP8FoibAp=MY4s5C8KmXfcPz4ChkQYGBrMnpv74xT4Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [lojban] [oz] {ve vimcu} vs. {te zilvi'u} vs. {se sumji}
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Felipe_Gon=E7alves_Assis?= <felipeg.assis@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133d92e67e4b004ef54d8e6
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

--001a1133d92e67e4b004ef54d8e6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

coi selpa'i

I noticed you used {ve vimcu}, and sometimes {te zilvi'u}, to translate the
idea of "remainder", as in
(1) {mi'a s=E8pli pi ro lo ve v=ECmcu be fi lo m=F9nje}
(2) {lo te zilv=EC'u be lo pr=E8nu cu m=E0rji lo bl=E0nu t=E0xfu}

I felt like I had to ask:
 1. How do you feel about using {se sumji} instead?
 2. Why exactly did you sometimes used {vimcu}, and sometimes {zilvi'u}? I
am equally unable to identify a possible vimcu1, in both examples above.

I personally like {lo se sumji be ko'a [bei zo'e]} a lot, as using {zo'e}
to refer to something recently mentioned is very natural, as in
 {ja'o la'e di'u kr=ECnu}.

mu'o
mi'e .asiz.

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--001a1133d92e67e4b004ef54d8e6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>coi selpa&#39;i<br><br>I noticed you used {ve vimcu},=
 and sometimes {te zilvi&#39;u}, to translate the idea of &quot;remainder&q=
uot;, as in<br>(1) {mi&#39;a s=E8pli pi ro lo ve v=ECmcu be fi lo m=F9nje}<=
br>(2) {lo te zilv=EC&#39;u be lo pr=E8nu cu m=E0rji lo bl=E0nu t=E0xfu}<br=
>


<br>I felt like I had to ask:<br>=A01. How do you feel about using {se sumj=
i} instead?<br>=A02. Why exactly did you sometimes used {vimcu}, and someti=
mes {zilvi&#39;u}? I am equally unable to identify a possible vimcu1, in bo=
th examples above.<br>


<br>I personally like {lo se sumji be ko&#39;a [bei zo&#39;e]} a lot, as us=
ing {zo&#39;e} to refer to something recently mentioned is very natural, as=
 in<br>=A0{ja&#39;o la&#39;e di&#39;u kr=ECnu}.<br><br></div>mu&#39;o<br>
mi&#39;e .asiz.<br><div><br></div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out=
">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br />

--001a1133d92e67e4b004ef54d8e6--