Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.17.22 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.17.22;
Message-ID: <52CB35E6.9000601@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:01:58 +0100
From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] [oz] Abstractors
References: <CALMa68oWfMcDbOOS+i=d5MLRZh_FzJC5H90sH092JZzWwHG6Eg@mail.gmail.com>	<52CB2C21.5080902@gmx.de> <CAO7tK2ey3MMH6ZyNj9iTxRR+hcgEdZve1ykLbrx0OrgQ5w+Fkw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO7tK2ey3MMH6ZyNj9iTxRR+hcgEdZve1ykLbrx0OrgQ5w+Fkw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

la .xorxes. cu cusku di'e
> Wouldn't "zukte ro lo se kakne be se va'u do" work?

Yes, it would.

The difference is just between doing and bringing about. The one I went 
with ({gasnu ro lo jai se kakne}, which means {gasnu ro lo jai se kakne 
be se va'u do bei fai lo ka gasnu}), says that he'll bring about all the 
things he can bring about, possibly including things he can't do 
himself, so I think I prefer gasnu in this case. That is not to say that 
{zukte} wouldn't work, of course.

mi'e la selpa'i mu'o

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.