Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.17.21 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.17.21;
Message-ID: <52CDC23B.5070607@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 22:25:15 +0100
From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] [oz] {dizlo tonga}
References: <CALMa68q3v8nUqQxK-Ugj0V0-=Sny1eO-+4cqtdTAA_fc-WqfBw@mail.gmail.com> <2110398.3dttylR5Gv@caracal>
In-Reply-To: <2110398.3dttylR5Gv@caracal>
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  la .pier. cu cusku di'e > We say "snosli tonga". (Who is this
    "we"?) I think "slowly oscillating" is a good approach. It also makes me
   think that children would then be more likely to "just know" that a higher
    pitch means a faster oscillation and a lower pitch means a slower oscillation.
    It kind of takes away the mystery. On the other hand, Lojbanic children will
    then inevitably become succesful scientists. [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (seladwa[at]gmx.de)
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid

la .pier. cu cusku di'e
> We say "snosli tonga".

(Who is this "we"?)

I think "slowly oscillating" is a good approach. It also makes me think 
that children would then be more likely to "just know" that a higher 
pitch means a faster oscillation and a lower pitch means a slower 
oscillation. It kind of takes away the mystery. On the other hand, 
Lojbanic children will then inevitably become succesful scientists.

Back on topic, while the idea is good, I'd say the lujvo should be 
{slisno}, not {snosli}. Then again, the place structure of {slilu}, 
specifically its x2, makes it a bit meaningless to use {masno} on it. 
There doesn't seem to be a difference between "oscillating quickly at 
1Hz" and "oscillating slowly at 1Hz"; neither is faster or slower than 
the other. Because of that x2, I think the better lujvo would be 
{cmasli} (and {brasli}).

cmasli : x1 slilu lo cmalu x2
         "x1 oscillates at a small frequency through stages x2"

Unless someone has objections, I will add {cmasli} and {brasli} to 
jbovlaste tomorrow or so, as well as replace {dizlo tonga} with {cmasli 
tonga} in the Oz text.

mi'e la selpa'i mu'o


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.