Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 69.168.97.50 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@leaf.dragonflybsd.org) client-ip=69.168.97.50;
X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=CtqGLBID c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=SZ+3KfWyp3FZfyu+tOqqUg==:117 a=SZ+3KfWyp3FZfyu+tOqqUg==:17 a=K-v-2zaBAAAA:8 a=_WQhAotw1e0A:10 a=AclY03ZhZMQA:10 a=8FkShg9EJMIA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=8ggJXkvBAAAA:8 a=4RBUngkUAAAA:8 a=31wZdKs86qcA:10 a=QdQwyFrqhp5YeyPd-UAA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10
X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Received-SPF: neutral (smtp02.hughes.cmh.synacor.com: 67.44.192.3 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of leaf.dragonflybsd.org)
Received: from [67.44.192.3] ([67.44.192.3:37636] helo=leopard.ixazon.lan)
	by smtp.hughes.net (envelope-from <phma@leaf.dragonflybsd.org>)
	(ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-SHA) 
	id 90/E7-09045-D70EDC25; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 18:34:24 -0500
Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by leopard.ixazon.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C474F9D
	for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Wed,  8 Jan 2014 18:34:11 -0500 (EST)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@leaf.dragonflybsd.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] [oz] {dizlo tonga}
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 18:34:08 -0500
Message-ID: <1629546.cMRg7GgG0A@caracal>
User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-57-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <52CDC23B.5070607@gmx.de>
References: <CALMa68q3v8nUqQxK-Ugj0V0-=Sny1eO-+4cqtdTAA_fc-WqfBw@mail.gmail.com> <2110398.3dttylR5Gv@caracal> <52CDC23B.5070607@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: phma@leaf.dragonflybsd.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=neutral
 (google.com: 69.168.97.50 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess
 record for domain of phma@leaf.dragonflybsd.org) smtp.mail=phma@leaf.dragonflybsd.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On Wednesday, January 08, 2014 22:25:15 selpa'i wrote:
> la .pier. cu cusku di'e
> 
> > We say "snosli tonga".
> 
> (Who is this "we"?)

I forget who else, but I've seen "mlisnosli" and "tcesnosli" for "tenor" and 
"bass".

> Back on topic, while the idea is good, I'd say the lujvo should be
> {slisno}, not {snosli}. Then again, the place structure of {slilu},
> specifically its x2, makes it a bit meaningless to use {masno} on it.
> There doesn't seem to be a difference between "oscillating quickly at
> 1Hz" and "oscillating slowly at 1Hz"; neither is faster or slower than
> the other. Because of that x2, I think the better lujvo would be
> {cmasli} (and {brasli}).

I think "cmasli" better fits an oscillation with a small amplitude.

Pierre
-- 
loi mintu se ckaji danlu cu jmaji

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.