Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:03:40 -0800 (PST)
From: menkei <dankaivel@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <88819e42-968e-4494-acfe-edbb6e3f9358@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALMa68qsmeza+Gm8GxTvgbJ02J66dsVrMWF1+ciJj8P2CUf=7g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0f438513-25ad-4873-993a-ea57be6607de@googlegroups.com>
 <CAOQ8VDUK8zYm1VLRXZsT=dN8wB9Km=SRhNKf8Dc2JQns0cRAsA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOQ8VDU9J7GiWFGtnqD-wzN6DVDt-=zNmAEPm9_pDit=+PC2Qw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALMa68qsmeza+Gm8GxTvgbJ02J66dsVrMWF1+ciJj8P2CUf=7g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Scientific Method
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_111_11437499.1389978220861"
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

------=_Part_111_11437499.1389978220861
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

iecai mi nelci lo se cusku be la asiz .i mi tugni .i ui


El jueves, 16 de enero de 2014 18:26:57 UTC-6, .asiz. escribi=C3=B3:
>
>
> On 16 January 2014 19:36, Jacob Errington <nict...@gmail.com <javascript:=
>
> > wrote:
>
>> Ah whoops, {lanli} already includes {tadji} in its x3. I amend my=20
>> proposed word thus:
>>
>> sketerlanli =3D x1 is the scientific method used in science x2.
>> .i x1 me lo te lanli be x2 noi saske
>>
>>
> I am pretty sure that the scientific method should be primarily a saske3.
>
> More fundamentally, why would the presence of {lanli} alone be sufficient=
=20
> to put Science apart from other forms of knowledge? The circumscription o=
f=20
> what is Science is open to philosophical debate, and what we call Science=
=20
> depends mostly on a historical tradition and established culture.
>
> My suggestion is to use a fu'ivla based on "scientia" from Latin, which=
=20
> unquestionably has a major role in the written tradition that shaped our=
=20
> modern concept of Science. That way we would be safer from accusations of=
=20
> epistemological bias. What do you think?
>
> mu'o
> mi'e .asiz.=20
>

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

------=_Part_111_11437499.1389978220861
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">iecai mi nelci lo se cusku be la asiz .i mi tugni .i ui<br=
><br><br><br>El jueves, 16 de enero de 2014 18:26:57 UTC-6, .asiz.  escribi=
=C3=B3:<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.=
8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br><d=
iv><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 16 January 2014 19:36, Jacob Errington <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"javascript:" target=3D"_blank" gdf-obfuscated=
-mailto=3D"jY-sP4YSJ7EJ" onmousedown=3D"this.href=3D'javascript:';return tr=
ue;" onclick=3D"this.href=3D'javascript:';return true;">nict...@gmail.com</=
a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-=
left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">Ah whoop=
s, {lanli} already includes {tadji} in its x3. I amend my proposed word thu=
s:<br>
<br>sketerlanli =3D x1 is the scientific method used in science x2.<br>.i x=
1 me lo te lanli be x2 noi saske<br></div><div><div><div>

<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br><div><div>I am pretty sure that=
 the scientific method should be primarily a saske3.<br><br></div>More
 fundamentally, why would the presence of {lanli} alone be sufficient to
 put Science apart from other forms of knowledge? The circumscription of
 what is Science is open to philosophical debate, and what we call=20
Science depends mostly on a historical tradition and established=20
culture.<br><br></div>My suggestion is to use a fu'ivla based on=20
"scientia" from Latin, which unquestionably has a major role in the=20
written tradition that shaped our modern concept of Science. That way we
 would be safer from accusations of epistemological bias. What do you=20
think?<br><br>mu'o<br>mi'e .asiz. <br></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out=
">https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out</a>.<br />

------=_Part_111_11437499.1389978220861--