Received: from mail-ie0-f190.google.com ([209.85.223.190]:55368) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1W9p0U-0004Kx-6U for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 20:50:21 -0800 Received: by mail-ie0-f190.google.com with SMTP id at1sf1758889iec.17 for ; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 20:50:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=CIC6LkIxaKkoTtrRpPHvarDplEwRf2KY4OANsDcbhiw=; b=y7rNZhpdytVP96BhCrHBbEtB1hR6POAgKY7quuM2fvF6oJVp68Tc6rORuzU+Y072Qy iYzjcifQ0GJrE6W+qE3pg3ztVGy4YN2lsyOVLoy2cnJjoFsI2VvTWE4zO8pYs2XrxDI9 kBlJ6pOE9eX0ke8idKCaCZiW061al66p8rbaltoo9FA+d0A3rHYYGtRTFuKI+sCF0F7f PTy2Lt5BezKiI7guCkuD7n12UnqL44m5pNCpnQaatypXaS3Y6x5fWYPEUe1pIjqgETuv l/8r9RcVNwdSuDQEcshHSb5Y4PxlfZJ+ZoW9TpmXn6iF04c8st0OjXeBA5MKVkGhPd7F QK5A== X-Received: by 10.50.230.34 with SMTP id sv2mr85168igc.9.1391316603892; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 20:50:03 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.25.234 with SMTP id f10ls1211516igg.10.canary; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 20:50:03 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.6.1 with SMTP id w1mr10928239paw.6.1391316603314; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 20:50:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com. [75.180.132.120]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id fp7si3736275vdc.1.2014.02.01.20.50.02 for ; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 20:50:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.120 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=75.180.132.120; X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=dq5Z+ic4 c=1 sm=0 a=GbbTObCcR0DEgiyvVRM9bQ==:17 a=1TgBNrMDQccA:10 a=TMWcxx2GWuUA:10 a=Yr05hP5UdKEA:10 a=LlzFzjEJNC0A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=JNFw9bs7AAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=nvihIkmAhy0A:10 a=rZy5OtlLv90rW2VvglEA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=HDMjJrb_xYoA:10 a=GbbTObCcR0DEgiyvVRM9bQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 98.122.190.249 Received: from [98.122.190.249] ([98.122.190.249:44929] helo=leopard.ixazon.lan) by cdptpa-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id FF/31-21884-A7ECDE25; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 04:50:02 +0000 Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leopard.ixazon.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305E04CAB for ; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 23:50:01 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Introduction to Lojban. How to quickly create sentences Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 23:49:58 -0500 Message-ID: <2591144.W3QC0Ir5tr@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-58-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <20140131225049.76d93fef@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 75.180.132.120 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) smtp.mail=phma@bezitopo.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Saturday, February 01, 2014 Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > Please explain what are verbs and nouns in general. And whether those terms > are logical at all. My belief is that they are not. > And if you start teaching newbies such terms as "sumti", "tanru" and > "sumtcita" instead of intuitive "verbs", "compound verbs" and > "prepositions" ... you'll get the current community of geeks. Most people > are just frightened of those lojbanic terms. Here's an attempt at defining these words: A verb is a word that takes arguments (sumti) and belongs to a class of words of which all take arguments (there may be some that take zero arguments) and a significant portion denote actions. A noun is a word other than a pronoun which does not take arguments and can serve, maybe with an article or maybe without, as an argument to a verb. A significant portion of the class of nouns denote persons, places, or things. "bajra" is definitely a verb. "djan" is definitely a noun. "la .djan. bajra" is a sentence consisting of a noun (with the article) and a verb. "mlatu" in "le mlatu cu bajra" is not a noun. Even though it is, with its article, an argument of "bajra", it still can take arguments, as in "le mlatu be la .sfinks. cu bajra". "bercribe" can arguably be both a verb and a noun. As a verb, it means "is a polar bear of some subspecies". As a noun, it means "Ursa Minor" (subject to the proviso that cmene in Lojban can be polysemic). Suppose you were teaching Tok Pisin, which distinguishes not only "we not including you" from "we including you" but also "we two not including you" from "we more than two not including you". Would you make up a word that means "we" without such distinctions? If you made up and used such a word, would the Tok Pisin speakers understand it? On Saturday, February 01, 2014 09:54:47 Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > #36: There's no infinitive in Lojban, as verbs are not inflected. "lo ka > > broda" > > is an abstraction phrase. It can be translated as an infinitive, but that > > doesn't make it one. > > If you say "There is no such thing in Lojban" one can conclude Lojban is a > underdeveloped language. > Isn't {broda lo ka [ce'u] brode} = y(x, f(x)) ? I always thought this is > exactly what an infinitive is. Is modern Russian an underdeveloped language because it doesn't have an aorist tense? Is Arabic an underdeveloped language because it doesn't have an infinitive? > English "we" means "I and at least one another person". A clear and useful > word without any polysemy. Lojban is less logical than English, right ? In most languages that have an infinitive, the infinitive does not conjugate according to its subject and is used most often without a subject; if it has a subject, it's shown in a different way than in finite verbs. The "lo nu broda" construct can take a subject in the same way that "broda" can; the construct is simply preceding a clause with "lo nu" and following it with elidable "kei ku". -- ve ka'a ro klaji la .romas. se jmaji -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.