Received: from mail-qa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]:40143) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WB93K-0001P2-20 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:26:42 -0800 Received: by mail-qa0-f61.google.com with SMTP id o15sf222315qap.16 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:26:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=pdqC/2RhW5Zhwf7u1kj2VF8dAL/VfJouJw9ejfLnOSI=; b=k4e81JQ3v7kSpIf107D5AS1Y9co8kpaozcmHM2pRRnH9UcUXyWcFQRMI2N12i8rGMi V+hUouiOF8mlXzhFWp5xSfQAghk0w2ak74JaD4pu8+ruHNExl6ZE84P0pIxOOrk60VuJ nipkOreIOSY7iV8xS1fQ4RNw05giOrJD8DnAAtfURMUNRBKmiZVtJLXMdSV+PFQckAT8 jirEhHnIgXIFgwWGCA5MPXaDz4qSaPKmP+mC/LfS90tWi5CjQAK7WwSx92mOcx9CTDdZ BcCvwI1tb8WQT9CXzaKUu0m01Q4g8FAKe56PCcj0gBxaRmlGGjj234+QU8UdTGrK5Lza sTBw== X-Received: by 10.140.83.212 with SMTP id j78mr88775qgd.3.1391631987781; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:26:27 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.97.196 with SMTP id m62ls324329qge.11.gmail; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:26:27 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.58.189.73 with SMTP id gg9mr1626815vec.34.1391631987536; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:26:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ve0-x22f.google.com (mail-ve0-x22f.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22f]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ys4si2611973vdc.2.2014.02.05.12.26.27 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:26:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22f; Received: by mail-ve0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c14so741143vea.6 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:26:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.133.15 with SMTP id oy15mr2228872veb.19.1391631987422; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:26:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.8.195 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 12:26:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52F224EA.1000108@gmx.de> References: <52F224EA.1000108@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:26:27 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Individuals and xorlo From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6d9f8244bcf204f1ae9291 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --047d7b6d9f8244bcf204f1ae9291 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:47 AM, selpa'i wrote: > >> lo pa xanto = zo'e noi ke'a xanto gi'e zilkancu li pa lo xanto, >> >> If I may, Dan is asking why the unit {lo xanto} cannot be (implicitly) > {lo ci xanto}, in which case three elephants would be counted as one > counting off by threes. Using a property in zilkancu3 would probably be > clearer for that reason. But "lo ka ce'u xanto" is a property of "lo ci xanto" as well as of "lo xanto", so I'm not sure it adds anything in that respect. "ka" does help people who don't like generic references, but I'm not sure it does anything more than "lo xanto" to specify the size of the unit. How would it help to say that you are counting by things that have the property "lo ka ce'u xanto" if among those things there's lo ci xanto as well as lo pa xanto? As it stands, some people seem to think that the zilkancu3 unit contains a > context-dependent inner quantifier, thus counting of by {xo'e mei}. I don't > think that's the intended meaning, so it should be stated clearly that > we're dealing with singletons. An important point of xorlo is that it gets rid of implicit quantifiers, but yes. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. --047d7b6d9f8244bcf204f1ae9291 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:47 AM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> = wrote:

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0lo pa xanto =3D zo'e noi ke'a xanto gi'e zil= kancu li pa lo xanto,

If I may, Dan is asking why the unit {lo xanto} cannot be (implicitly) {lo = ci xanto}, in which case three elephants would be counted as one counting o= ff by threes. Using a property in zilkancu3 would probably be clearer for t= hat reason.

=A0But "lo ka ce'u xanto" is a property o= f "lo ci xanto" as well as of "lo xanto", so I'm no= t sure it adds anything in that respect. "ka" does help people wh= o don't like generic references, but I'm not sure it does anything = more than "lo xanto" to specify the size of the unit. How would i= t help to say that you are counting by things that have the property "= lo ka ce'u xanto" if among those things there's lo ci xanto as= well as lo pa xanto?

As it stands, some people seem to think th= at the zilkancu3 unit contains a context-dependent inner quantifier, thus c= ounting of by {xo'e mei}. I don't think that's the intended mea= ning, so it should be stated clearly that we're dealing with singletons= .
=A0
An important point of xorlo is that it gets rid of impli= cit quantifiers, but yes. =A0

mu'o mi'e xo= rxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--047d7b6d9f8244bcf204f1ae9291--